Points of Comparison Between Incomparable Points

September 18th, 2007, 6:30 pm by NetIncome

Comparing Jason Kidd and John Stockton at age 34 is helped by how close their birthdays are. Kidd turned 34 on March 23, 2007. Stockton turned 34 on March 26, 1996. Making the comparisons easier is Stockton’s 1996 Olympic biography, which listed all his successes up to that point. Also helpful, his NBA.com player information page.

To be fair, we’ll make comparisons as of this time of year, after a summer of international play but prior to training camp.

Here are some points of comparison between the points at age 34:

–Jason Kidd has taken the Nets to the NBA Finals twice. John Stockton had yet to get the Jazz to the Finals, making the trip at ages 35 and 36.

–John Stockton had just won his second Olympic Gold Medal. Jason Kidd gets his chance at No. 2 next summer.

–Jason Kidd has been selected to First Team all-NBA five times, second team once. John Stockton had been selected to the first team twice, the second team six times, the third team once by age 34.

–John Stockton had been selected to the NBA All-Star team eight times. Jason Kidd has been selected seven times.

–Jason Kidd has 87 triple doubles. John Stockton had yet to pick up his first, which he did at age 41. He finished with one TD.

–John Stockton had 10,394 assists. Jason Kidd has 8,691. Stockton finished with 15,806, the all-time career record.

–Jason Kidd has made either first or second team All-Defensive team nine times. John Stockton had made third team twice.

–John Stockton had 2,365 steals. Jason Kidd has 1,902. Stockton finished with 3,265, the all time career record.

–Jason Kidd has led the NBA in triple doubles 10 consecutive seasons. John Stockton led the NBA in assists eight consecutive seasons.

–John Stockton had yet to have his microfracture surgery. He underwent the procedure at age 35. Jason Kidd had his at age 31.

34 Responses to “Points of Comparison Between Incomparable Points”

  1. Great comparison between two of the best PG’s, not only of our generation, but of all-time. However, since you did compare individual stats, achievements, awards and accomplishments, how could you forget to mention how much better of a rebounder Kidd is? Well all know that J-Kidd STILL is one, if not the best, rebounding guard in the league. That’s a stat that you should have also mentioned, considering that it also includes defensive and offensive rebounds, which creates 2nd chance points and obviously more offensive opportunities! And well all know, Kidd is/was a better rebounder than Stockton was.

  2. Spikefromlawschool Says:

    I realise you are trying to be fair to the 2 players by listing the above accomplishments BUT and it is a very very big but if Jason Kidd had played in Magic’s era he would not have “been selected to First Team all-NBA five times, second team once” He would be looking at a whole bunch of second or third team selections. Kidd has 83 % as many assists as Stockton and a PG’s job is to distribute. Kidd had 80% as many steals as the slow white guy.

    I love Kidd, second best PG of this generation and the best rebounding PG of all time…. but referring to triple dooubles is kinda like commenting on woman’s looks by saying …she s got a nice personality. A PG’s job is to run the offense. Stockton did that superbly for his team.

  3. Ridiculous. Jason Kidd is amazing, absolutely. But lets not compare Triple Double numbers, okay? The numbers of 1st Teams, 2nd teams, all defensive teams, and all-star teams are also irrelevant. Stockton was always underrated, hence, he wouldnt win popularity votes(which all of those things were.) All of a sudden, he had been leading the leaugue in assists by a huge margin, and finished with the all time mark on steals and assists that I dont think can ever be broken. Im not trying to take anything away from J-Kidd. He certainly has been the best- since Stockton. Stockton played in a day with Isiah Thomas, Magic Johnson, Gary Payton, Kevin Johnson, and a much better time for basketball. He got overshadowed even in his own day. Dont take it away from him because he wasnt the best rebounding point guard ever. He was the greatest pure point guard ever.

  4. JKidd is the ONE.

    Stockton was great. Equating a player’s propensity to achieve triple-double’s to a woman having a “nice personality” says a lot about the poster’s (a) bias towards Stockton, (b) lack of appreciation for a PG’s all-around game and (c) taste in women.

    He’s basically saying that getting triple-doubles is secondary to running an offense like a woman’s “nice personality” is secondary to…um…good looks? or maybe reproductive fertility?

    Stockton was a specialist. He did what he did well. Ran the offense to perfection. But only made the Finals once playing the second fiddle to Malone.

    JKidd is a great team leader. He’s made the players around him better, year in and year out. He also made the Finals twice being the main man on a lesser team.

    Stockton was a great assist man and teammate but JKidd is the general. The better player and stronger leader.

  5. Lets not forget that Stockton got to play with Malone for all those years. What good point guard wouldn’t rack up a ton of assists with the Mailman?!? Kidd’s had good teammates, but Kenyon Martin and Richard Jefferson can’t compare to Malone.

  6. does no one notice that Jason Kidd can’t shoot worth **** yet john stockton can?
    Forget that put in that all important FG% huh?

    When a play breaks down, the pg is going to need to shoot it. I’d rather have it in stockton’s hand than kidd’s

  7. This article isn’t to diss Stockton. He’s clearly one of the greats of the game. To claim as some have above that he’s the best ever though is something only a really lazy youngster would claim. This is strictly a comparison between Stockton and Kidd. Neither of these guys compare to Magic Johnson, for example.

    Stockton was a very good guard but did have the benefit of running the ol pick and roll as the first and second scoring option for the Jazz with the greatest power forward of the era (and, arguably, of all time) in Malone. Do you honestly think if Kidd were playing in Stockton’s place that he wouldn’t be able to do *at least* as well? C’mon.

    Stockton was a great thief, but a poor rebounder and his amazing assist numbers were in large part due to the greatness of his primary playing partner. Huge assist numbers like his means you have someone night after night who can *finish.* And Malone was a beast, an ironman who delivered year in, year out, rain or shine.

    Unlike Steve Nash who can make players better and literally thinks on his feet, freewheeling a play each and every possession, Stockton more or less did the same thing each game, all game long: pick an roll with Malone. It’s not easy to imagine that Stockton could generate the same numbers if he had to run Kidd’s bunch of gimpy whippets year after year.

    Kidd does more with less (in terms of consistent talent) not only because he *has to* but because he *can.*

  8. take a look at stockton’s true shooting percentage -absolutely sick! These guys played different games, but they were both awesome two way players. Anybody on this board that thinks either of these two are the greatest ever is out of their minds. One might make #4 all time.

  9. If we put J-Kidd in John Stockton’s era, one of the comments says that J-Kidd wouldn’t have made as many first teams. That I do not dispute. It was a great era (The best in my opinion). But in today’s era where the athleticism of today’s stars is a lot greater than those of the past, would Stockton be able to guard the young PGs of today?

    Oh yeah, remember the year that J-Kidd got traded for Steph and J-Kidd ended up taking the Nets to the Finals, do you think that if Steph were traded for Stock (a Stock in his prime even, with Stock going to the Nets) would the Nets have made the Finals? I dare you to say YES with a straight face.

    There’s a reason why Triple-Doubles are important. It displays one’s overall contribution to their team. If I needed a clutch shot or assist maybe I’d take Stock over Kidd, but Clutch Rebounds, Steals, and Defensive Stops overall have a greater effect on the overall 48 minutes of the game in which I’d take Kidd in a heartbeat.

    I guess it boils down to your personal preference. If you highly value one’s ability to individually dominate at certain aspects of the game, then you’ll say that Michael Jordan is the greatest player ever to play the game and that John Stockton is the greatest pure point guard. But if you highly value one’s ability to truly elevate your teammates’ play by playing a more well-rounded game then you’ll say that either Larry Bird, Magic Johnson are the greatest players ever to play the game and Kidd the greatest point guard.

  10. slam online reader Says:

    Charles, I understand you’re trying to just compare two guys, but your support at the bottom isn’t really very good. Your reasoning is to take away from Stockton because he played with Malone, yet you say Magic was probably the best, when he played with entire team full of stars. For consistencies stake, that would imply Kidd does more too than Magic did. Also, if Stockton racked up so many assists because his finisher was so good, Kidd also boards great because his big men are so bad at rebounding.

    The shooting is a tremendous hole in Kidd’s game, and it’s one thing that you don’t become a great rebounder at 6′1 and lack of hops, but at 34 you still don’t have a good jumper when that was the only weakness you had since your rookie year!? A rebounding machine Kidd is, but Stockton was a great pure shooter too. They really do excel at different areas, and it’s hard to say one is better, but you MUST include shooting if you’re going to talk about triple doubles.

    2 last thoughts. 1) Tim Duncan is the best PF of all time. 2) Complete and utter excellence and dominance is when everyone knows exactly what you’ll do, but nobody can stop it. The fact that the pick and roll was run to the most perfect motion has to be commended because every single team, player, and coach knew exactly what was going to be run, but were helpless to do anything about it.

  11. i’d take stockton.

  12. Notably absent from the list is shooting percentage (which matters a lot more then triple doubles, which is kind of a b.s. stat).

    So the critical question, it seems to me, is whether Kidd’s superior rebounding and defense make up for his inferior offensive game.

  13. In a way, the criticisms balance out.

    On the assists front: Yes, Stockton probably got more than half his assists on P&R with Malone, but Kidd probably got half of his assists on Alley-oops to guys like Martin, Jefferson and Carter. So those go-to plays are roughly the same.

    Stockton was clearly the better shooter, while Kidd is clearly the better rebounder.

    Stockton was always feared as a shooter, even when he had guys like Russell and Hornacek on the team, so he wasn’t depended on as a shooter.

    Likewise, Kidd has always been a great rebounder, even when he had Martin so didn’t need to focus on rebounding so strongly.

    Overall, Stockton was a great PG and Kidd is a great PG. Stockton seems to be on a higher level than Kidd, even if Kidd now serves Stockton’s old role of veteran PG star in the NBA.

    Spam protection: Sum of 4 + 7 ?
    D’oh!

  14. i think they’re both great PGs as they are able to do what is required of them, and that is to run the play. i also think that despite Kidd’s lacking a more consistent go-to-guy, he was able to create opportunities for his team on offense largely in part to the wingmen’s athleticism. Stockton was great because he mastered, no, perfected the pick and roll. and if that’s what he has to do to secure the win, then that’s what matters. If Kidd has to do all the rebounding to make sure there are enough opportunities to score or create plays, and to contribute, then by all means he should. this is just comparison of their stats, but that it should end at that coz these two PGs have different games, different teammates, play at different times, and have different approaches but that they were able to contribute to their team, and dominate the field during their prime. to say that Kidd is a poor shooter doesn’t really translate to being a poor PG, as there had been times the offensive load sat squarely on his back, but that he was able to carry the team as it’s leader and at the same time still run the play.

    all in all, the TDs of Kidd is just an indicator of how hard he plays, and how much he’s willing to contribute.

  15. Who cares who’s better? They are/were both two of the greatest PGs of all time and do/did what was needed to lead their respective teams.

  16. Stockton in a heartbeat.

    The best PG bar none.

    Facilitate offense, that’s what a point guard is for me, and that’s what Stockton did superbly.

    Also, his personality is one of a kind. Very classy fellow, unlike the whinny players of today’s age.

  17. –Jason Kidd has made either first or second team All-Defensive team nine times. John Stockton had made third team twice.

    –John Stockton had 2,365 steals. Jason Kidd has 1,902. Stockton finished with 3,265, the all time career record.

    I found this hilarious. Stockton had 400 more steals, but because of the players of his generation, he didn’t get as much recognition as Kidd has. We all know Stockton is one of the best defensive PGs of all time, yet he only makes the All-Defensive THIRD team TWICE? Messed up.

    I also got a bring up a semi-off topic point. Am I the only one who thinks it’s messed up that Steve Nash has 2 MVPs and almost a third, yet John Stockton has none at all, and the one his team who did win an MVP never would have without him? This dude is the best PG of all time, with WAY better numbers then Nash, yet 20 years from now people might be thinking Nash is better than Stock because of the 2 MVPs. That just annoys me a little.

    Stock is my favorite player of all time from my favorite college, so there is a little bias :P

  18. Fair point to Slam Online reader. A few points of clarification. Magic did not play with an “entire team full of stars.” James Worthy was the only real all-star from those years, and Kareem by that point was well on the decline with a serviceable sky hook but not a whole lot else. The rest of the Showtime crew was stocked with quality role players. The best starters of the Stockton-Malone era Jazz imho were about on par with the Showtime starters. The difference was Magic and the Lakers’ ridiculously deep bench.

    Magic made it all work at optimum levels, raising everyone’s game all while not being the primary option for scoring (he was the quinticential pass-first point who at one time had be harrassed by Riley into taking more shots). Stockton on the other hand ran that pick and roll all night and it was the Jazz’ primary (and secondary) scoring tactic. It worked so well not because Stockton was some “genius” at passing the rock to Malone (hello? have you played basketball? the PnR is one of the easiest concepts to master), but because Malone was well-nigh unstoppable. Again, unlike Kidd, Stockton played for years with an all-star workhorse who hardly ever missed a game.

    I think we’re all agreed that if JKidd was a better shooter this comparison is a no-brainer not worth arguing about. However, since JKidd is the lesser in an admittedly important area, there’s some room for debate. That said, I still give the clear edge to Kidd because he can do more, overall, if you include intangibles like playmaking ability and making the other guys better.

    “Yes, Stockton probably got more than half his assists on P&R with Malone, but Kidd probably got half of his assists on Alley-oops to guys like Martin, Jefferson and Carter. So those go-to plays are roughly the same.”

    That’s nuts.

    “Very classy fellow, unlike the whinny players of today’s age.”

    Selective memory “mj.” Stockton in his day was as reviled as a dirty player as much as Bruce Bowen is now. Is he “classy” cuz he’s never been arrested? Big deal. Lotsa players never get arrested.

    p.s. MVP just means you’re considered the most important player on one of the top teams in the league. It’s notable but these awards don’t necessarily mean a whole lot all by themselves, it’s part of the total picture. Nash will nevernevernevernever ever make an All-Defensive squad of any kind.

    p.p.s. Tim Duncan has been my favourite player since his senior year in college. I do believe he is the GOAT PF, but his greatest competition for that title is none other than Karl Malone (and it’s not like it’d be a cakewalk comparo either).
    Does anyone know for sure if these All-Whatever teams are voted on by coaches/players or by fans. AFAIK, it’s NBA coaches. I think they’re less susceptible to falling into the name-recognition trap that waylays most fans. They know the deal, they see these players up close and have to plan against them over the course of a season.

  19. Whoops, I should state i know that the players for the All-Star game is voted on mainly by fans. I just mean stuff like the All-defensive team and First Team, Second Team selections an that.

  20. Okay, let me make this easier for you guys. You can attribute a large number of Stockton’s assists to Malone, yes. But that does not mean that he didnt help make Malone one of the top two PF’s of all time. Stockton got him the ball, and did it to perfection. To say that we can all run the P+R and comparing it to pickup games is completely asinine. I did watch the Jazz religously growing up and am biased toward Stockton, but if the other team knows its coming and still cant stop it that means they were better than everybody else. They continuously were among the best teams in the league, and made it to the Finals twice, by the way. Stockton’s ability to take over the game and score when it matters most is a huger difference between the two. Not just his ability to shoot the Jumper, but he would drive and score and pick-up fouls much like Nash does now. He only did it when they really needed it though. He hit an ubelievable amount of big shots to win games.

    Dont give me that Kidd was a better defender crap. Stockton is the alltime steals leader too. I will backup a comment somebody made about stockton being one of the most reviled players in the league during his time. He was, because he played as hard as possible, setting hard picks- fighting through picks, diving for loose balls, making the steals, and playing good solid defense. Did he get lit up by GP a few times, sure. A few. If he played today I would pit him against any PG in the league and they would fear the matchup. They would get owned by Stockton.

    His team was much much better because of him. I cant say anything about Stockton leading the Nets, or any other team to the finals. He did lead the Jazz to the finals twice. He made Greg Ostertag, Antoine Carr(?), David Benoit, and Jeff Hornacek all really good players. And just like everybodies argument that Malone made Stockton, Stockton helped make Malone. Stockton also rarely missed games, I believe he was out about two months when he had a procedure that is now known as microfracture surgery- thats pretty tough.

    Comparing him to Magic, who played center and other positions, is unfair. Comparing him to J-Kidd is reasonable- but you cant tell me that J-Kidd is better. J-Kidd is unbelievably good, very talented and a hard worker who does make his team better. I am always impressed when I see him play and he deserves all the recognition he gets. But he gets a lot of it, and Stockton is forgotten. I wont forget you Stockton. J-Kidd, the best rebounding PG ever. Stockton- best PG ever. Stockton wins- hands down!!!

  21. Stockton got the all-time numbers in steals mainly due to his amazing durability. It’s a valuable trait, no doubt (ask JKidd if he’d like to be as durable, or have Kmart, Jefferson etc be so blessed). But in terms of steals/game, Kidd’s no slouch in that dept either (Stockton 2.2/gm, Kidd 2.0/gm), so that’s more or less a wash there. It’s a matter of games played and Stockton’s simply played longer.

    “Stockton got him the ball, and did it to perfection.”

    Man, it doesn’t take any special talent for an average NBA guard to feed space eating Karl Malone the ball in a half-court set. Honestly. Kidd could handle that much. Isaiah Thomas could handle that much. Mo Cheeks could manage that and you bet Magic Johnson (a point guard, look it up!) could do it too. Making the right decisions in open space, fast-breaks or running the very complex triangle or “flex” offenses effectively that takes some special basketball IQ. Not saying Stockton couldn’t do that, it’d be speculation of course, but we know Mr. Kidd can with ease.

    Ok, I’m out. Someone else can pick up the baton.

  22. Why is it that everyone is criticizing Stockton for running the pick & roll to perfection? If it’s so easy to rack up assists and points with guaranteed finishers like Malone, why hasn’t it been the go-to play for every NBA team with a finisher? Seems to me that it would be more difficult to consistently execute the same offensive strategy when every defense knows it’s coming, every time. Running the pick & roll requires precision and decision-making, and Stockton had both. Note that Stockton’s career assist-to-turnover ratio was over 3.7, versus under 2.9 for Kidd. He didn’t make mistakes. And anyone in Utah will tell you that Malone would never have come close to Michael’s and Wilt’s career scoring numbers without Stockton. For a long time Malone couldn’t get his own shot, he had to get the ball in the right spot to score. He developed a bit of a fadeaway jumper in the mid-90s, but that was pretty far into his career.

    Also, Sloan was responsible for the pick & roll, so don’t take anything away from Stockton for running it. It’s easy to forget because it wasn’t a focus of the offense, but Stockton could run the break pretty well too. He wasn’t flashy, and placed the pass for a layup rather than an alley-oop, but he could play outside his element. He also had his share of no-look passes, and could thread the needle as well as any player in history.

    Stockton was also more of an athlete than he’s getting credit for here. The guy was 6-1, 175 lbs, and played 19 seasons in the league. He was once measured with 2.3 percent body fat. He didn’t dunk the ball, but he didn’t tear up his ankles either. He had over 3200 steals, for crying out loud, he wasn’t slow. Gary Payton, who was insanely quick at the height of his “glove” days, used to talk more trash than anybody. A reporter was asking Stockton about it one time, though, and Stockton just said “he never talks to me.”

  23. It’s hard for me to remember a time when J-kidd had to battle it out with another legendary point guard in the playoffs. Stats don’t matter to me much when selecting a great point guard but they do measure in a way a players athletic ability. So…..J-kidd was fast, just watch him run the break. Stockton was quick. There is a difference. Two very different styles of play. Stockton was like a running back quick, while J-kidd was like Wide receiver quick. J-kidd has break away speed, stockton had that quick first step. J-Kidd could rebound with a stumps for hands, and Stockton had razors for elbows. You cannot compare the two.

    J-kidd had, oh…I don’t know….10 players that were athletic enough for an ally-oop.
    Stockton had 2 players that could handle a similar pass. (maybe three)

    This is were the breakdown matters most:
    Stockton knew how to manage the game clock. More times than not the Jazz would score twice with 35 seconds or less in a quarter. The only player better at doing that was MJ.

    To this day, I struggle to find any individuals that can command that type of game control with success.
    I do really think that since the rule changed for Illegal defense that nobody will be able to dominate inidividually statistically the same way. Numbers have deflated. Which speaks volumes for the very dominant players of todays league.

    Edge by being able to play the game better is Stockton. He did play the game better. And please, please please don’t try to say he was slow. Those Jazz team’s ran opponents off the floor.

    For the record, Magic did have an All-Star team when he was drafted into the league. Magic was more physically gifted. He had great court vision. But what would have happened if the Clippers or Warriors drafted him instead? Probably no titles. Remember, it is a team game. MJ had Pippen and other quality players. Tim Duncan has….well who doesn’t he have. Shaq had Kobe. Kidd had amazing ally-oopers. And Stockton had Malone, and Hornecek…./gasp.

  24. Jason Kidd has not led the league in Triple Doubles 10 consecutive times. KG led the league with 6 in his MVP year.

  25. Pardon, KG led the league with 6 in what SHOULD have been his first MVP season, 02-03.

    http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/statistics?stat=nbadd&league=nba&sort=td&order=true&season=2003

  26. The jazz never missed the playoffs with John Stockton. They reached the western finals 5 times in 7 years. Anybody else want to make the point that he isnt a team leader. Has Kidd ever missed the playoffs?

    Okay, Im done arguing over this. Im not saying Kidd was/is a bad defender. But you proved the point yourself, Charles Follymacher, with the Stat- Stockon:2.2 Steals/gm; Kidd: 1.9/gm- true, Kidd is no slouch. But my point is that it isnt Stockton’s record just due to playing for so long, and for rarely missing a game. Its because he was good. I dont care if he never got selected to the 1st NBA Defensive team or not. By the way, the stat at the top is wrong. Stockton was all Defensive Second team 4 times at this point. 5 Times total. As for your other point

    “Man, it doesn’t take any special talent for an average NBA guard to feed space eating Karl Malone the ball in a half-court set. Honestly.”

    Stockton, contrary to popular belief, did more than just feed Karl Malone. In fact, he didnt only use a pick and roll to be able to pass. Heck, he even threw some alley-oops. Maybe only once or twice though. Im serious, I feel like Im arguing with a bunch of 4th graders here. Stockton is in the top 3 on the Point Guard of all time list, at worst. No questions asked. I know Magic is #1 and he is a PG. Seriously, I know. But, he did line up at other positions, starting as a center for one Game 7 as I recall. Him being 6′9″ makes it a lot more Apples and Orange of a debate. Yet, Magic is everywhere-still. My point was that Stockton gets completely disrespected.

    He broke Magics all time Assist record.
    He Tied the playoff record for most assists in a game.
    Most assists in a season.
    He has the All time lead in Steals.
    He has the Highest assists/gm in a season.
    He led the league for 9 straight seasons, a record too.

    Do i even need to go on??? J-Kidd may be able to enter the discussions someday. For right now, you can compare him to Nash, or GP, or whoever else you want to. You can compare his rebounding stats to somebody that isnt 6′1. But you cant compare stats to John Stockton.

  27. Well, I’ve been called out, so I’m back in. I’m not sure what you want, Drew and Stock and Gangstahoopa (ha!). If anyone would care to actually read what I wrote, I never at any point said Stockton wasn’t good. He is one of the greats, one of the NBA’s official list of the Top 50 greatest. I’ve said it before and I’d say it again (well, just that one last time. it’s annoying having to repeat oneself). But this isn’t about whether John Stockton was any good as a baller.

    There seem to be a couple of things that seem to be developing here: 1) Stockton is the greatest PG of all time; 2) Stockton is better than Kidd. I could sorta add a third, that Stockton-is-better-than-Magic stuff, but that kinda rolls into #1.

    #1) Any talk that Stockton is the greatest point guard of all time is just plain silly and not worth my time. It’s truly wishful thinking with blinders on. Geez, even Isaiah Thomas, talk about not getting due respect, was a little better than Stockton. There are simply far too many resources available online that squash that idea. And saying it’s unfair that Magic was too tall is the funniest bit I’ve read in a while. Ok, so we’ll call Stockton the best “short” point guard ever. Oop, there’s Isaiah again.

    #2) Again, my aim is not to diss Stockton really, but to put his stats in context — that is, in comparison to Kidd’s situation. To those who say, “most steals ever!” I say, well that’s because he maintained a .2 steal/game advantage over Kidd for six more years than Kidd. Kidd’s played enough years now, he’s no flash in the pan a la Mike James, so it really is fair to say they’re essentially equal in that department.

    I’ve never said he wasn’t an athlete. Sure, he played below the rim, but so did Malone. Doesn’t mean he wasn’t strong (for a guard) and couldn’t run you ragged. So that’s another bogus argument. Look at what I actually said, please.

    The coach instituted the PnR and the coach is primarily responsible for managing the clock (the point guard executes the plays, yo), tho to suggest Kidd sucks at making good decisions with time running out is ignorance.

    As for feeding Malone, I mention that only because Stockton’s awesome assist numbers were due in large part to him. I didn’t mean to imply Stockton can’t pass the rock in any other situation — just that the PnR staple was the main source of his numbers. Malone was more responsible for the success of that play than Stockton. Kidd hasn’t had the benefit of playing with the same caliber player (consistently) for the same length of time. Doesn’t mean Stockton sucks, just means that compared to Kidd he’s had a much longer time frame and with better personnel (again, compared to Kidd) to produce them numbers. Yet for all that, Kidd is only significantly behind Stockton in shooting percentage, while crushing him in rebounds.

    When you take all that Kidd can give you, on balance, I believe Kidd can do more for more kinds of teams than Stockton. For the last time, this does not mean I think Stockton sucks. I just think Kidd’s now reached the point where I can feel confident in saying i’d be smarter to have Kidd on my team than Stockton if all other positions were going to be filled at random.

    I really get the feeling that a lot of you just plain like for whatever reasons. That’s fine. Hey, I’d pick Paul Millsap for my starting PF even though I know there’s still TD and KG out there. I just like the guy. But this is about recognizing who can do the most for you when all is said and done.

    p.s. Will the original poster of this article make an appearance in the comments or is this squabbling all for your amusement?
    p.s. Kidd has the most triple-doubles (by far) since 1986. Look it up.

  28. Random side note here…. something that will forever bother me about the achievements in Jason Kidd’s career. If Nash won the MVP two years in a row for how he made the Suns a sudden “contender”, how did Jason Kidd not win it for what he did when he came to the Nets? I have been a Nets fan for about 12 years now. Does anyone remember how different they became? If the sign of a great point guard is one that makes his entire team better, how about a point guard that makes an entire franchise better and essentially changes the expectations of its entire fan base? Even in a fairly bad year, the Nets make the playoffs now.

    Did anyone wath the FIBA Tournament of the Americas? Jason Kidd turns every team he’s on into a ball-sharing machine. His focus and mentality are so infectious that he seems to really make players around him play up to (and above in many cases) their seeming potential.

    Admittedly, I am on the J-Kidd side of this debate, but just too be fair, I’ll play devil’s advocate and help the Stockton supporters out here:

    As you can see, I’m not even talking about statistics, since it is fairly a wash in that department given Kidd’s insane rebounding and Stockton’s ridiculous and somehow still underated “J”. Stockton was never traded. Jason Kidd is on his third team and was almost traded to the Spurs a couple seasons back and all but had a Lakers jersey on earlier this year. If you want to talk about the greatest players of all time at any position, for the most part even in their decline, their teams did not truly consider trading them…. although some went to other teams on their own terms. Coaches and GM’s don’t let “GOAT” players leave, because there is always value to keeping them around.

    And, for the Nash fans out there, here’s something in your defense:

    If you look at career stats, Nash is not in the same league, however, it makes it all that more impressive that a player can continuously elevate his level of play over the course of his career to the point that for even one or two seasons, he is one of the greatest.

    Take any two of the best years of any of these guy’s careers, and compare stat lines…I think you’ll find that this devate will never stop, which leads me to concluded that we have been privy to one of the best point guard era’s of all time! Enjoy it for what it’s worth…

    p.s. the Suns actually had Kidd, Nash, and Kevin Johnson on the same team at one time…. I would have paid top dollar to watch an scrimmage at one practice

  29. Okay, lets agree to disagree. Except for one thing-Paul Millsap. We actually agree that if we were starting a team, Paul Millsap would be our guy. Remember when I said I felt like I was arguing with a 4th grader? I take it back. I didnt mean it. Lets be friends. And to think, I was about to compare Kidds rebounding stats to Dennis Rodman’s. I was about to say that would be, essentially, the same thing. Except that Rodmans not a PG. Maybe he should have been. I mean, if he was on a team with as much loaded talent like Utah back in the day he would probably would be the all-time assist king. Heck, he would’ve made Felton Spencer look like the next Shaq, before there was Shaq, ya know- since the PnR is so easy. Well forget it, I dont want to argue anymore. Im not even going to compare Kidd’s and Magic’s rebounding stats to each other, either. That would be too much like comparing Apples and Apples. Man, if only J-Kidd could have had the dynamic duo of Derrick Coleman and Keith Van Horn around during their very rexpectable glory years.

  30. Not to get too far off topic here, Drew, but since you mentioned it (although somewhat jokingly) has anyone reading this blog ever actually seen the stats on True Rebounding Efficiency (it may have been called something else, but close enough). When they account for the number of rebounds available to actually get while you were on the floor along with minutes played, the Rodman numbers are mind boggling. I haven’t been able to find that article from a couple years back ever again, but it was shocking and I already thought he should have been an all-start several times over. Basically, he played on some good teams that didn’t miss too many shots, especially during the Bulls campaign, but when they did, if he was on the court, you were safe to bet your money on Rodman grabbing the board.

    Seeing how badly the Nets could use a defensive minded double digit rebounding big man, it might be time to start a “sign Rodman to the Nets” blog…(joking…sort of)

  31. Forget the stats. When Kidd played Stockton, if Kid had the ball in scoring position the double team had to come help, but if Stockton had the ball in scoring position Karl Malone would come set a pick to try get Stockton some space he couldn’t otherwise get.
    Enough said.

  32. Tip o’ the hat @ Drew. All that rebounding stuff when straight over my head tho (”huh? what?!”). Sorry if something I said implied more diss than intended. I’ll admit I didn’t really like Stockton much personally, but he has to be respected.

  33. I dont know if were still talking about this, but my point with the rebounding thing was what made write in the first place. They compare Kidds rebounding stats to Stocktons. And Triple Double numbers. Admittedly, this is Kidds thing. And he is a great great player. Iver said that from the beginning. But throwing out those statistics isnt comparable- which is the headline of this topic. Anyways, I dont take it as a diss to Stockton- but Ill say what I said before- compare his Assists, steals, Points, Assist to turnover Statistics when the careers are over. Stockton was a winner, albeit not a Championship. Oh and the poster Coach, comparing when they played each other- what are you talking about??? Its not enough said. When they played each other Stockton was probably about ten years younger. Malon setting picks is what they did against everybody! Look at any post on this topic and you would believe they dont know how to do anything else. And are you talking about when they played each other in one certain game, everytime they played, or what? Is it comparable to say that Stockton had help when defending a much younger Kidd when that is a gamneplan decision- to double team a point guard and force turnovers. Again- look at the lifetime statistics or go watch some NBA Classic games. I would suggest the game 6 against the Rockets when Stockton hits the buzzerbeating three pointer to send the Jazz to the 97 Finals.

    Stockton= All time Great

  34. I think they are both great guards. When it comes to running the offense I would be estatic with either one. My question is how is their shooting percentage for all categories. My guess John a better shooter while Jason is a better rebounder. With regard to the Olympics, Team US desparately needs Jason in order to win the gold. In summary, they are are both true point guards that I would pay to watch. To watch them is like listening to great music or watching a movie that has a great script and great actors.

    Magic= All time Great.