Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: This Week In GIFs

Nets Unlikely To Extend Lopez

The next big deadline for the Nets (and every team with a 2008 first rounder on their roster) is January 25, when teams must sign players to contract extensions or let them become restricted free agents come July 1. David Aldridge writes that Brook Lopez is among those who are highly unlikely to get a new deal in the next week.

"The Nets were not likely to give Lopez, who's the major piece in their potential trade package for Dwight Howard, a new deal to begin with," writes Aldridge. "The fact that Lopez is out for a couple of months with a stress fracture in his right foot seals the (non) deal."

Beyond the machinations of the "Dwightmare", Aldridge points out that most teams are tightening their wallets in the face of what will be tougher CBA restrictions come 2013-14. But with Lopez an RFA, the Nets are gambling on another team making a max or near-max offer for Lopez. Should the Nets trade for O.J. Mayo before January 25, they'll have to make a decision on him, too.

Aldridge also hints that the Nets, along with the Celtics and Wizards, could be in the mix for a healthy Jeff Green this summer. Green, coming off heart surgery, will be an unrestricted free agent.

Comment 419 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

the lopez injury this season makes me

appreciate having a good center more. during dwightmare he got no love now the whole team is doo doo except for brooks, and he isn’t going to get an extension offer? absurd

by SlammaJammaBingBong on Jan 17, 2012 7:46 AM EST reply actions   1 recs

Can you name a single RFA that has been extended besides D Rose?

It’s not a slap in the face at all. It would be if he was unrestricted, or maybe even if the Nets didn’t habe cap room, but they do.

And by not extending him, his cap hold will only be for about 7mil, giving the Nets a lot of room under the cap. If they extend, he becomes nearly untradeable as a Base Year Compensation player and will eat up the Net’s cap room, making it impossible to add Brook to a Deron and Dwight team

by Murse Mike on Jan 17, 2012 8:29 AM EST up reply actions  

huh?

"It's as sweet as it ever was, I'll tell you. Now, hopefully, we started something and we can win some more championships, but we're going to enjoy this one right now. Have a little champagne." --Julius Erving, May 12, 1976, ABA champion Nets locker room.

by Net Income on Jan 17, 2012 7:48 AM EST up reply actions  

Haha

I mean the Nets are unlikely to extend Lopez if they end up getting Howard….

by boogeewon on Jan 17, 2012 8:05 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

if Dwight goes to the Nets as a FA

then it’s VERY likely they extend him. His cap hold is for less than 8mil

by Murse Mike on Jan 17, 2012 8:30 AM EST up reply actions  

Has anyone done the actual math on this?

Can we have both Lopez, Deron + Dwight (if D12 comes as a FA instead of during the season)?

Section 18, Row 7 at The Rock!
"Your 2010-2011 New Jersey Nets - It Is What It Is"

by eLonepb on Jan 17, 2012 8:52 AM EST up reply actions  

If the Mavs can have Dirk, Dwight and Deron as the media love to portray

then, yeah, why not?

2011-2012 season prediction: 22-44

And I'm fine with that. One of the original leaders of the "Dwight Howard, not Nono Hilario" movement.

by BigTom on Jan 17, 2012 9:03 AM EST up reply actions  

Well as most of the media is now indicating

The Mavs would basically be able to make an offer to two max players that they might not laugh at… IF they get rid of Haywood and Marion.

Section 18, Row 7 at The Rock!
"Your 2010-2011 New Jersey Nets - It Is What It Is"

by eLonepb on Jan 17, 2012 9:13 AM EST up reply actions  

ive been saying this for months

they can get rid of both. Amnesty Haywood. Trade Marion. Marion would be trade-able.

by orangeeater on Jan 17, 2012 9:16 AM EST up reply actions  

Really?

They’d have to include a couple picks probably to get rid of Marion.

Section 18, Row 7 at The Rock!
"Your 2010-2011 New Jersey Nets - It Is What It Is"

by eLonepb on Jan 17, 2012 9:18 AM EST up reply actions  

who's going to take on Marion salary

without sending back salary? That’s the only way Dallas can make room, trade and not take back any salary

by domininaldo1981 on Jan 17, 2012 10:17 AM EST via Android app up reply actions  

nope

DAL can dump everyone but Dirk and still won’t have room for 2 max deals. Only way to do it is if they amnesty Dirk. Stein acknowledged to me Deron and Dwight would have to take paycuts.

by Andres B on Jan 17, 2012 9:30 AM EST up reply actions  

I didn't say max

But they can make offers to two max-level players that they wouldn’t necessarily run and laugh at.

A couple mil short of max for each player.

Section 18, Row 7 at The Rock!
"Your 2010-2011 New Jersey Nets - It Is What It Is"

by eLonepb on Jan 17, 2012 9:31 AM EST up reply actions  

I have in my fanpost

http://www.netsdaily.com/2012/1/11/2700723/debunking-the-ddd-mavs-myth

There are MANY different ways to do it, but all it would take is to move Morrow+ Nets’2012 pick, which is the easiest way to lose enough salary, and it looks like this

Deron Williams cap hold: 17,779,458

Brook Lopez cap hold: 7,692,458

MarShon Brooks: 1,160,040

Jordan Farmar: 4,000,000

Johan Petro: 3,500,000

Shawne Wiliams: 3,135,000

Jordan Williams: 762,195

Minumum cap hold x5: 2,450,900

Cap room = 17,563,949, and a stretch clause used on She Williams takes us to the max

by Murse Mike on Jan 17, 2012 9:07 AM EST up reply actions  

Whoa wait we're going to move Morrow

AND our 2012 lottery pick??

Section 18, Row 7 at The Rock!
"Your 2010-2011 New Jersey Nets - It Is What It Is"

by eLonepb on Jan 17, 2012 9:12 AM EST up reply actions  

I never said that it has to happen like that

only used that as an example of how it’s very possible to get the max cap room

People might doubt the Nets’ ability to move Farmar, or Petro, or Shw Williams
But there’s no denying that moving Morrow and the pick could EASILY be done.

by Murse Mike on Jan 17, 2012 9:28 AM EST up reply actions  

Farmar did say he's opting out, so if we don't trade him,

we still save on that salary.

hopefullyMemphis see the benefit in that and asks for Farmar instead of Morrow, leaving us with a shooter to send Orlando if this deal still happens.

by bkfire on Jan 17, 2012 11:55 AM EST up reply actions  

Yes we can

2012 – 2013 budget

$4 mil – Farmar
$4 mil – Morrow
$1 mil – Brooks
$3 mil – Petro
3 mil – Shawne Williams
600 k – J Willaims
Say $6 mil – two draft picks (our own high one plus Rockets non-lottery)
$7 mil cap hold for B Lo

That’s roughly $29 million. However, it’s likely Billy will dump at least two of the contracts for the Morrow, Farmar, Petro bunch. If they knocked off all three we would be at $18 million including the cap hold for Lopez. Add about $35 million for Williams and Howard and we are at $53 million, about $5 mil below the cap before resigning Brook.

WE WANT LOPEZ! clap clap clap clap clap

by BrooklynNets on Jan 17, 2012 9:13 AM EST up reply actions  

that's what Kerber has reported

"It's as sweet as it ever was, I'll tell you. Now, hopefully, we started something and we can win some more championships, but we're going to enjoy this one right now. Have a little champagne." --Julius Erving, May 12, 1976, ABA champion Nets locker room.

by Net Income on Jan 17, 2012 7:49 AM EST up reply actions  

so what are we waiting for.....we need guys who can actually play basketball

and he is an expiring deal as well isnt he?
farmar and what type of pick? not the rockets pick?

Section15 Row 12 Seats 1&2

by Angelo Mihalitsianos on Jan 17, 2012 7:51 AM EST up reply actions  

he will be an RFA as well

if his contract is not extended and it won’t be.

No idea what pick or how much cash because the report out of Memphis had the Nets offering Morrow straight up or Farmar, an unspecified pick and cash. Remember, there is a limit on how much cash a team can use over the course of a year, $3 million. How much of that $3 million do you hold in reserve for a Howard deal?

"It's as sweet as it ever was, I'll tell you. Now, hopefully, we started something and we can win some more championships, but we're going to enjoy this one right now. Have a little champagne." --Julius Erving, May 12, 1976, ABA champion Nets locker room.

by Net Income on Jan 17, 2012 7:58 AM EST up reply actions  

if we sen Farmar will our rotation return to

The one where Gaines was PG?

Nets Mets Giants All day Every day.
Beware the Lopez
NY Giants Tribute

by netsareboss on Jan 17, 2012 8:08 AM EST via iPhone app up reply actions  

The Rockets' pick isn't that valuable

The Nets’ 2012 pick is. The Rockets’ pick has a lot of protection. It’s likely not to be moved for a few more seasons

by Murse Mike on Jan 17, 2012 8:32 AM EST up reply actions  

The 25th pick in this draft wasn't that valuable

Until it became MarShon Brooks.

All picks are valuable if you have a good team of scouts and draftnicks.

Section 18, Row 7 at The Rock!
"Your 2010-2011 New Jersey Nets - It Is What It Is"

by eLonepb on Jan 17, 2012 8:53 AM EST up reply actions  

picks are only valuable in a trade if the other team wants them

and if the pick is pushed a few years, most teams don’t consider that very valuable

by Murse Mike on Jan 17, 2012 9:09 AM EST up reply actions  

Still has value long term

Section 18, Row 7 at The Rock!
"Your 2010-2011 New Jersey Nets - It Is What It Is"

by eLonepb on Jan 17, 2012 9:13 AM EST up reply actions  

Morrow is a good fit with Dwight, while Mayo would kind of replicate some of Marshon's skills with Dwight

I’m torn on the trade. I buy both arguments, pro and con. Trading Farmar and the pick is more acceptable to me, but then they’d be very low on ball handlers, and perhaps they want to hold onto as many picks as possible for later.

2011-2012 season prediction: 22-44

And I'm fine with that. One of the original leaders of the "Dwight Howard, not Nono Hilario" movement.

by BigTom on Jan 17, 2012 9:06 AM EST up reply actions  

I am not opposed to having either Marshon or Mayo come off the bench

and be that high score 6th man – always have some kind of offense on the floor.

See Lou Williams with the Sixers

by bkfire on Jan 17, 2012 12:01 PM EST up reply actions  

Why didn't they want to extend Brook before he went down?

Is this strictly because of the DH fiasco or are they really just unhappy with Brook? Letting him walk seems ridiculous. Outside of DWill, he’s our best player.

by JohnFromLongIsland on Jan 17, 2012 7:53 AM EST via mobile reply actions   1 recs

they are all-in on Howard

"It's as sweet as it ever was, I'll tell you. Now, hopefully, we started something and we can win some more championships, but we're going to enjoy this one right now. Have a little champagne." --Julius Erving, May 12, 1976, ABA champion Nets locker room.

by Net Income on Jan 17, 2012 7:59 AM EST up reply actions  

We are all in

Except the Lakers are holding the two aces.

Section 18, Row 7 at The Rock!
"Your 2010-2011 New Jersey Nets - It Is What It Is"

by eLonepb on Jan 17, 2012 8:48 AM EST up reply actions  

Can you name a single RFA that got extended besides Rose???

It’s not b/c of Howard. Lopez as a RFA, only has a 7.7mil cap hold. So the Nets could have room for a max FA, Deron, AND Brook if they extend him after they sign their max FA.

Westbrook, Love, Gordon – none of them got extended either

And unless you’re going to offer him the max, it’s better to match any offer he gets anyway.

by Murse Mike on Jan 17, 2012 8:36 AM EST up reply actions  

And Westbrook is interesting

What about a trade of Lopez for Westbrook? Harden makes Westbrook expendable, as crazy as that sounds.

Nets could have a core of Williams, Westbrook, Brooks, + high draft pick (most likely a young big man) to entice Dwight with.

WE WANT LOPEZ! clap clap clap clap clap

by BrooklynNets on Jan 17, 2012 9:18 AM EST up reply actions  

not enough balls to go around with those 3

If I’m trading Brook in means to entice Howard in the off season. I’d do a sign and trade with Atlanta for Josh Smith. He’s one of Dwight’s friends, and the combo of Deron, Smith, Howard, Brooks…wow.

by domininaldo1981 on Jan 17, 2012 11:29 AM EST up reply actions  

If the NBA is run by evil henchmen, hell bent on conspiracies

Things will start magically going the Nets way as soon as we hit Brooklyn. There is no way Stern wants a failed franchise in the #1 media market with the possibility of their only foreign ownership losing interest and abandoning a franchise.

So if you believe in conspiracies, you ought to believe it’s going to go our way soon.

Section 18, Row 7 at The Rock!
"Your 2010-2011 New Jersey Nets - It Is What It Is"

by eLonepb on Jan 17, 2012 8:49 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

if there was a conspiracy

the Nets wouldn’t have gotten screwed earlier when Orlando’s GM had already approved the original deal.

by MrDollarBills on Jan 17, 2012 9:14 AM EST up reply actions  

Yes they would've, that was the CEO's call

League has no say on that.

Section 18, Row 7 at The Rock!
"Your 2010-2011 New Jersey Nets - It Is What It Is"

by eLonepb on Jan 17, 2012 9:17 AM EST up reply actions  

Makes sense

If we extend Brook, his extension counts against the cap. If they don’t, only his cap hold counts against the cap. He’ll get his money but this gives the Nets more flexibility in the summer.

by KnownAsMacho on Jan 17, 2012 8:03 AM EST via mobile reply actions   1 recs

Why don't more people understand this?

So many people consider Nets fans to be more educated and realistic in basketball knowledge, but the number of people who think that this is a bad move have proved that to be wrong

by Murse Mike on Jan 17, 2012 8:37 AM EST up reply actions  

I admit at first I freaked

But after a while I figured it out. Hopefully thts the case with the others who say this is bad as well

Nets Mets Giants All day Every day.
Beware the Lopez
NY Giants Tribute

by netsareboss on Jan 17, 2012 8:41 AM EST via iPhone app up reply actions  

So much for dreams of the most disgusting frontcourt in basketball

I would’ve loved to see Brook and Dwight team up to destroy the league.

by Frigidevil on Jan 17, 2012 8:03 AM EST reply actions  

Same.

11 + 12. It’s a match made in NBA heaven, what can I say. As a basketball fan, I hope Brook stays, or Dwight comes, or both. As a longtime Nets fan, I know there’s a 90% possibility that Dwight signs elsewhere, Brook pulls a Shaq (our own fault), and Deron will be Dallas’ new star. Oh well.

by Brooklyn-Bound on Jan 17, 2012 8:34 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

11 + 12 = 23

We could be on to something…

Nets Mets Giants All day Every day.
Beware the Lopez
NY Giants Tribute

by netsareboss on Jan 17, 2012 8:36 AM EST via iPhone app up reply actions  

There's so much wrong about that post I won't even bother with most of it

but I will correct you in the Brook cannot walk in 2012 if the NEts want to keep him. He’s a RFA!!! And his cap hold is only for 7.7mil, leaving the Nets with room for another max contract if they only choose to extend him AFTER they use their cap room.

And if Brook were to get a better offer, the Nets could match it and keep him

by Murse Mike on Jan 17, 2012 8:42 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

He has to sign the offer for that to happen

He won’t. The Nets can offer the most money and most years.

by Jack Handy Jr on Jan 17, 2012 11:32 AM EST up reply actions  

If Dwight makes it to FA

you can bet that the Nets will have already sold Brook on the possibility of him and Dwight playing side by side.

by domininaldo1981 on Jan 17, 2012 11:34 AM EST up reply actions  

they're gambling too much

Even if Dwight comes let’s say a team offers Brook the max the Nets can’t give 3 max contracts. (?)
Deron & Dwight would have to except cheaper deals to keep big disney.~
Seems to me with this move they’re making Brook expendable for the hope they will sign Dwight.

Risky business.

"I define passion as extreme emotion."

When you have to shoot, shoot don't talk.

by universal on Jan 17, 2012 6:20 PM EST up reply actions  

What are you talking about?

The ONLY way for Dwight and Brook to play together is if Brook DOESN’T extend until after the Nets sign DWight as a FA.

Do you know how the salary cap, restricted free agency, or cap holds work? or what a Base Year Compensation player is? SMH…

by Murse Mike on Jan 17, 2012 8:40 AM EST up reply actions  

I was under the impression the nets might not re-sign lopez at all

Its easy to say we are gonna wait to sign Dwight first, but how long is Lopez going to wait to get paid? I know we can go over the cap to re-sign him but can you really expect him to sit and wait if someone immediately offers him a max deal?

by Frigidevil on Jan 17, 2012 12:33 PM EST via Android app up reply actions  

he's a RFA

it doesn’t matter, Nets can match unless they absolutely are not going to sign him. He can’t just simply sign and walk.

by domininaldo1981 on Jan 17, 2012 12:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Hopefully Lopez is here next season.

I miss seeing this guy put up goofy shots and get the And1 he really could be unstoppable on offense.

by nwkiddnj on Jan 17, 2012 8:04 AM EST reply actions  

make more sense to wait

and if another team offers him the max im 100% that we match the offer….no way in hell do we let him walk

by mikeyexcel201 on Jan 17, 2012 8:04 AM EST reply actions  

why in the world are we not resigning Lopez?

Unless we’re getting Dwight for sure this man should be gettin a max deal or something close. He is our center. He deserves more than he’s being credited. Losing Lopez will be King’s greatest mistake.

Nets Mets Giants All day Every day.
Beware the Lopez
NY Giants Tribute

by netsareboss on Jan 17, 2012 8:05 AM EST via iPhone app reply actions   1 recs

but it says we're unlikely to resign him

Or would we give him a new contract all-together?

Nets Mets Giants All day Every day.
Beware the Lopez
NY Giants Tribute

by netsareboss on Jan 17, 2012 8:18 AM EST via iPhone app up reply actions  

Says unlikely to get a new deal

I see it does give off that nuance but probably means “not this year”. We can either match what he gets in his RFA or extend him next year should he just accept the qualifying offer. That is of course if the Dwight trade doesn’t work out.

by mvmt84 on Jan 17, 2012 8:28 AM EST up reply actions  

Exactly,

The ones complaining don’t understand the situation

by nwkiddnj on Jan 17, 2012 8:11 AM EST up reply actions  

As someone said up above…….by not extending in January it gives the Nets maximum flexibility. And as a restricted free agent, the Nets can force the rest of the NBA to set Brook’s value and simply match that contract. I suspect that we will see more of this type of front office maneuvering in the years to come.

by Ryan243 on Jan 17, 2012 8:09 AM EST reply actions  

OT: but in the last thread guys were making a big deal out of the word "super star"

IMO if losing Brook Lopez is THE reason Deron is Playing badly we can’t call him “Elite” as we thought he was when he first got here. He is not a top 5 player if he rely’s on others to be effective. NOW, AGAIN, before you goblins get all upset and try to attack me, IMO he’s just in a mental slump and it’s not because Lopez is out, but if the problem is Lopez absence then he’s not an Elite player.

by nwkiddnj on Jan 17, 2012 8:09 AM EST reply actions  

Sorry I totally missed the part that he was a PG.

Regardless if he’s a PG,C,PF it doesn’t matter. We can make the argument that it hurts his ability to score not having Lopez but it doesn’t make him turn the ball over or shoot this horrible percentage. He is also getting tons of assist from Okur and Morrow on the 3 point line. He also has been playing bad defense, he also can’t seem to finish at the rim or hit a floater. Yes Lopez makes things easier but an Elite player doesn’t look BAD because he’s on a bad team. I’ve seen rookie PG look good on bad teams why can Deron? Again I hope and think he’s just in a mental slump but if his play is because he’s on a bad team (PG or not) than he isn’t Elite, just a very good player

by nwkiddnj on Jan 17, 2012 8:26 AM EST up reply actions  

it could be a mental slump

He’s never been used to losing like this on a common basis

Nets Mets Giants All day Every day.
Beware the Lopez
NY Giants Tribute

by netsareboss on Jan 17, 2012 8:28 AM EST via iPhone app up reply actions  

Let's hope so

I was extremely excited to get DWill. I love PG play more than any other position on the sport. But he has to pick it up

by nwkiddnj on Jan 17, 2012 8:41 AM EST up reply actions  

I agree with both Ryan243 & nwkiddnj

You both make good points, He should be playing better because he is just too good of a player (top 8) At least.
On the other hand he cares about winning so much that he is pressing and it has effected his production ,he’s trying to teach the offence while trying to run the team.
You see some players have good numbers on bad teams because they don’t care about the team or winning at that stage of their careers in a lot of cases. Just think back to when we had Stef. Marberry and Stev. Jackson?

The Hardest thing for some men to do is .... Believe what they see!

by Benz Zito on Jan 17, 2012 8:57 AM EST up reply actions  

EXCUSES

D-Will does not make ANYONE around him better, he’s a terrible leader, he cannot shoot to save his life, and his turns the ball over at an alarming rate

he’s not top 10. Not even close

He doesn’t have to score a million points. But if his overall level of play was better from start to finish the Nets would have more wins than they have now

by MrDollarBills on Jan 17, 2012 9:17 AM EST up reply actions   2 recs

And his game is predicated on the pick and roll with dominant post players

I know he looks terrible, but he also consistently shows flashes of his elite athleticism, decision making, and ball handling. If he stays after the terrible season we are going to have, then he is the best franchise player anyone could hope for.

WE WANT LOPEZ! clap clap clap clap clap

by BrooklynNets on Jan 17, 2012 9:25 AM EST up reply actions  

And as for the Mayo trade…….you do realize he is a SG right? So assuming the Nets are able to trade Farmar for Mayo (as a RFA I suspect it’s not a first rounder but a second rounder the Nets are offering) does create a bit of a log jam in the back court. Morrow would remain as the shooter off the bench, but this either forces the Nets to play Brooks out of position at the SF with Mayo at the SG or to reduce Brook’s minutes. The only other thing I can think of is that it gives the Nets flexibility in a Howard trade by guaranteeing that we will still have a quality starter at the 2…..and I don’t see Orlando wanting Morrow so he would remain as shooter off bench.

by Ryan243 on Jan 17, 2012 8:14 AM EST reply actions  

He's def more comfortable as SG

but he’s a combo guard. Even as a PG, would perform much better than any of our PGs not named Williams. Come to think about it, it is surprising we don’t have any other Williams in guards position lol

by mvmt84 on Jan 17, 2012 8:31 AM EST up reply actions  

That's exactly what that move is for. Plus right now, though he is out of position,

MArshon has to play SF, we’ve got noone. Sure it’ll be difficult for him guarding, but it ‘ll be the same for the oppositon. We’ve got noone else, unfortunately.

by bkfire on Jan 17, 2012 1:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Wow....this has all the makings...

…of a disaster for the Nets.

- Nets don’t extend Lopez

- D12 traded to Lakers

- Lopez offered max deal from another team; Nets decline to match

-Nets miss out on any other potential FAs during offseason

- DWill leaves

- MarShon is ‘just a scorer’

- Lopez develops into a top 3 center in the league and leads new team to multiple playoff appearances

by Versifiervt on Jan 17, 2012 8:15 AM EST reply actions  

The Nets won’t decline to match. Why would they? If Deron leaves and Dwight goes to LA we overpay for someone. It worked for the Knicks. They overpaid Amare and that brought Melo. I’m not too worried now that the Nets are willing to spend.

by KnownAsMacho on Jan 17, 2012 8:17 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Question is...

…will the Nets give Brook a qualifying offer if they’ll have their sites on other big names in Free Agency? I think they’d have to make that decision based on their ‘gut feeling’ of who they might sign. So if they decided not to give him the qualifying offer in the summer…brook goes from restricted to unrestricted(or at least that’s how it was in the old CBA). Do you trust the Nets to make a smart decision here….especially since they’ve been all about going after the big fish and saving money?

by Versifiervt on Jan 17, 2012 8:20 AM EST up reply actions  

the same teams that will have the cap space to offer brook a max contract

will probably be trying to offer Dwight a max contract. So most likely, Brook won’t see offers until after Dwight signs

by domininaldo1981 on Jan 17, 2012 12:40 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes

The Nets will definitely present Brook with the qualifying offer, because that’s how they retain restricted status on his free agency. There’s no risk in that, because his qualifying offer is significantly less than his cap hold anyway. The Nets front office would be leaping for joy if Brook signed the qualifying offer, because that would give us even more 2012 cap room.

by TheNetsFan on Jan 17, 2012 1:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Worrying about Lopez leaving

Is way, way down on my list of concerns. If anything, i’d want him to leave so the team could rebuild properly and not dump 10M+ in a center that averaged 6 rebounds and doesn’t play a lick of defense.

Oh pissing blimey there's jam coming out of the walls!

by TWilliAM on Jan 17, 2012 8:19 AM EST up reply actions  

clearly one season defies a career

Brilliant

Nets Mets Giants All day Every day.
Beware the Lopez
NY Giants Tribute

by netsareboss on Jan 17, 2012 8:22 AM EST via iPhone app up reply actions   1 recs

He wasn't that great before then, either.

His rebounding has been in decline since his rookie year.

Oh pissing blimey there's jam coming out of the walls!

by TWilliAM on Jan 17, 2012 8:23 AM EST up reply actions  

Sorry to me it's not even all THAT bad

He literally grabs 2 more rebounds per game (that Hump doesn’t steal) and suddenly he had an excellent rebounding.

Agree there were games he was putrid on rebounding, but his overall average was 6. Two more silly boards and not a single person is knocking him.

Section 18, Row 7 at The Rock!
"Your 2010-2011 New Jersey Nets - It Is What It Is"

by eLonepb on Jan 17, 2012 9:15 AM EST up reply actions  

exactly

I would kill to have Lopez here RIGHT NOW.

At least Brook would show up to put the ball in the hoop and never checked out of games. I’ve never gained so much appreciation for a player in such a short amt of time

by MrDollarBills on Jan 17, 2012 9:20 AM EST up reply actions  

He's soft and always will be, including mentally

But he’s an offensive machine and pretty efficient at it. I absolutely miss him just as much, but he was a pouter too if you recall.

Section 18, Row 7 at The Rock!
"Your 2010-2011 New Jersey Nets - It Is What It Is"

by eLonepb on Jan 17, 2012 9:22 AM EST up reply actions  

I wonder how many teams would take a center that is 23 yrs old and averages 20+ points

and around 7 rebs?

WE’RE THE FREAKIN NETS, MAN!!!!!! Are you really gonna complain about Brook Lopez? Only 23 and hasn’t hit his celing yet.

I prefer to think that the 8 boards per are what he is capable of as opposed to last year.

I predicted 23 and 9 and sticking to it – and on the points, that may be 2-3points less than what he could get.

by bkfire on Jan 17, 2012 1:20 PM EST up reply actions  

8 rbg is bad as well?

That takes Bynum out of the picture…

Nets Mets Giants All day Every day.
Beware the Lopez
NY Giants Tribute

by netsareboss on Jan 17, 2012 2:33 PM EST up reply actions  

surprising comment

With the team missing Lopez’ 20 points and presence down low you’d think appreciation for him would go up.

"I define passion as extreme emotion."

When you have to shoot, shoot don't talk.

by universal on Jan 17, 2012 6:33 PM EST up reply actions  

It does in Brooks case

Defise, that is.

I probably have the worste grammar and spelling on netsdaily but that post was funny.

by Zartan on Jan 17, 2012 12:25 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

the guy was blocking shots like a boss

Before he broke his foot

I love the Nets...too bad they don't love me...

by BEB on Jan 17, 2012 8:26 AM EST via iPhone app up reply actions  

You do realize that the ball is in the Nets court……they have the right to match any deal made for Lopez. If you extended him now it’s a concrete dollar amount. What if he struggles upon coming back and is no longer capable of playing more than 20 minutes a night? Then the Nets are screwed paying starting center money to a backup. This is/was the prudent move by the Nets. Take a breath. This doesn’t affect the roster next year in a negative way.

by Ryan243 on Jan 17, 2012 8:19 AM EST up reply actions  

They can always do a sign a trade in that case.

They could probably get a few nice assets for him, too.

Oh pissing blimey there's jam coming out of the walls!

by TWilliAM on Jan 17, 2012 8:22 AM EST up reply actions  

whoa...slow down there...

…lots of people have felt that Lopez is better than Hibbert who is now beginning to look like a legit center. Lopez is not the toughest center in the world but he is more than a nice piece for a team. Not worth max but he doesn’t deserve a slap in the face especially since he’s been a good soldier on a bad team since he’s been in the league.

by Versifiervt on Jan 17, 2012 8:22 AM EST up reply actions  

I'm curious to see if the mavs drops Odom contract

if the opportunity is available for us via free agency, i think the players we should go after are Howard, Odom, and CJ Miles

by netsnation on Jan 17, 2012 8:23 AM EST reply actions  

Having a rough year so far

Section 18, Row 7 at The Rock!
"Your 2010-2011 New Jersey Nets - It Is What It Is"

by eLonepb on Jan 17, 2012 8:58 AM EST up reply actions  

Might need a lot of players

If D12 falls through.

Beggars can’t be choosers.

"It's as sweet as it ever was, I'll tell you. Now, hopefully, we started something and we can win some more championships, but we're going to enjoy this one right now. Have a little champagne." --Julius Erving, May 12, 1976, ABA champion Nets locker room.

by Net Income on Jan 17, 2012 9:44 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Don't beg!

Take what you want or move on.

by Zartan on Jan 17, 2012 12:27 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

alright I understand the situation now

I thought they were blowing off Lopez but it’s for flexibility and making sure he can perform after the injury. As long as we don’t let him up in FA I’m fine with this. Smart FO we got. In King I trust.

Nets Mets Giants All day Every day.
Beware the Lopez
NY Giants Tribute

by netsareboss on Jan 17, 2012 8:23 AM EST via iPhone app reply actions  

If the Nets extend Lopez e becomes a Base Year Compensation player

and it makes his outgoing salary for matching salaries the average of the rest hi contract, but actual salary only 3mil, making it REALLY hard to match salaries in a trade.

It will also increase the Net’s salary and lower their cap space, should he get anything more than his cap hold which he will. It makes no sense for the Nets to extend him.

by Murse Mike on Jan 17, 2012 8:24 AM EST reply actions  

Ah, I see now. Thanks.

2011-2012 season prediction: 22-44

And I'm fine with that. One of the original leaders of the "Dwight Howard, not Nono Hilario" movement.

by BigTom on Jan 17, 2012 9:11 AM EST up reply actions  

BYC no longer exists

"It's as sweet as it ever was, I'll tell you. Now, hopefully, we started something and we can win some more championships, but we're going to enjoy this one right now. Have a little champagne." --Julius Erving, May 12, 1976, ABA champion Nets locker room.

by Net Income on Jan 17, 2012 9:44 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Terrible for Memphis

Yeah

Oh pissing blimey there's jam coming out of the walls!

by TWilliAM on Jan 17, 2012 8:26 AM EST up reply actions  

Lopez > Gasol

and younger too
and the fact the Memphis wants to move Mayo makes him much less valuable , so at the very least
Morrow=Mayo

by Murse Mike on Jan 17, 2012 8:45 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Do you have any solid basis for that claim?

Because it really hasn’t even been close the last two years. Efficiency and rebounding both go to Gasol.

And that’s ignoring the fact that Gasol is much better defensively.

Oh pissing blimey there's jam coming out of the walls!

by TWilliAM on Jan 17, 2012 8:49 AM EST up reply actions  

Tons

Gasol if efficient only b/c he plays off of Z-Bo and Gay. It’s easy to be efficient as your team’s 3rd or 4rth option.

Now since Z-Bo is injured, and he’s now the team’s goto post guy, his efficiency has dropped significantly with more touches, just like his defense

by Murse Mike on Jan 17, 2012 8:53 AM EST up reply actions  

Spurious claims aside...

My point stands.

BTW, based on this year’s performance, Gasol would be the Nets best player by a wide margin…. but apparently, he can’t play without Z-Bo (or Gay, who is just awful).

Oh pissing blimey there's jam coming out of the walls!

by TWilliAM on Jan 17, 2012 9:06 AM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, nevermind the years of chemistry and the loads of talent around him

That has nothing to do with his good play…
All sarcasm aside, Lopez has proven himself to be VERY reliable even without any talent at all around him, and he’s several years younger.

I’d be willing to concede that they’re just about equal in talent (even though I don’t think they are), but even if they are, Lopez being years younger and with most potential to grow makes him much more valuable

by Murse Mike on Jan 17, 2012 9:12 AM EST up reply actions  

Lopez has been a good player....

He’s just not good when he’s grabbing 6.1 rebounds per 36 minutes.

Nobody in the NBA would take Lopez over Gasol. That’s just a fact.

Oh pissing blimey there's jam coming out of the walls!

by TWilliAM on Jan 17, 2012 9:16 AM EST up reply actions  

no
Nobody in the NBA would take Lopez over Gasol. That’s just a fact.

That’s an opinion. Lopez’ 6.1 r/36 was the exception to his career, not the norm

by Murse Mike on Jan 17, 2012 9:42 AM EST up reply actions  

Well, nobody competent at least.

Lopez was a below-average rebounder the year before, too. Not as awful as last year, but certainly not “good”.

http://www.thenbageek.com/players/compare?utf8=%E2%9C%93&season=2010&player_ids%5B%5D=196

Oh pissing blimey there's jam coming out of the walls!

by TWilliAM on Jan 17, 2012 9:46 AM EST up reply actions  

I would

M. Gasol is a very overrated player, who has the same limitations that Brook does. Except Brook is a more proven scorer and has a bigger offensive repertoire.

by DarkXaero on Jan 17, 2012 1:06 PM EST up reply actions  

NI posted during the summer a comment made about Lopez in terms of him stating that he'll have no problem playing next to Dwight Howard, since he played the 4 at Stanford

I wonder how aware is Lopez of the situation, and eventhough we presented the opportunity of a Howard/Lopez duo frontcourt, is Lopez and Howard aware of that potential scernario? does that make Howard want to ride the season out, like DWill currently doing?

by netsnation on Jan 17, 2012 8:28 AM EST reply actions  

Doubt it will happen

If Nets get Howard, they will have little room for Lopez who will get a max offer in summer maybe from Disney World

"It's as sweet as it ever was, I'll tell you. Now, hopefully, we started something and we can win some more championships, but we're going to enjoy this one right now. Have a little champagne." --Julius Erving, May 12, 1976, ABA champion Nets locker room.

by Net Income on Jan 17, 2012 9:47 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

stop whining

The only way Lopez isn’t on this team next year is if Howard is he. This isn’t as big of a deal as most of you are making it out to be.

I love the Nets...too bad they don't love me...

by BEB on Jan 17, 2012 8:30 AM EST via iPhone app reply actions  

I’ve been one of the more optimistic fans but the talk about Howard adding teams to his list of preferred destinations has put me on the fence in regards to the Nets future…

by njnets2010 on Jan 17, 2012 8:32 AM EST reply actions  

Yeah , DWILL probably told him that it sucks here now......

Hey Dwight, Do you believe that these fans are getting on me now for not playing hard or trying…..

by NetFan48 on Jan 17, 2012 8:33 AM EST up reply actions  

My hope is that Howard comes to the Nets via free agency.

That way we’ll actually have a cromulent team around him and DWill. You figure the Nets will take a PF/SF prospect in the draft.

They could be really good really fast in that scenario.

Oh pissing blimey there's jam coming out of the walls!

by TWilliAM on Jan 17, 2012 8:32 AM EST reply actions  

I’m kinda hoping that DWill and DH12 take pay cuts just so they can add some decent players.. go at it the Miami Heat Model instead of the New York Knicks Model…

by njnets2010 on Jan 17, 2012 8:39 AM EST up reply actions  

At least 3 yrs?

At most

Plan A all the way: Brook, Brooks, Deron, Dwight and a top draft pick SF

by John at the Jersey Shore on Jan 18, 2012 9:01 AM EST via iPhone app up reply actions  

the plan

Dwill and Dwight opt out
Nets sign Dwight and AK47
Nets can then sign Dwill Lopez and Hump and go over the cap

by DJ HeavyDuty on Jan 17, 2012 8:41 AM EST reply actions  

stevenson?

ITS A VVVVVVCCCCCCCCCCC THREEEEEEEEEEEEE

by Keysta101 on Jan 17, 2012 8:45 AM EST up reply actions  

no way that works

The Nets will have to renounce Hump and Okur, their 2012 pick, AND remove either Morrow or Farmar
And still the Nets would be a few 100k short of offering Dwight a max deal

by Murse Mike on Jan 17, 2012 8:48 AM EST up reply actions  

they have won 3 straight

Keep it up!

I love the Nets...too bad they don't love me...

by BEB on Jan 17, 2012 8:47 AM EST via iPhone app up reply actions  

Doubt they make the playoffs

I think Golden State and the TWolves are more likely to rally into a playoff spot if one becomes available

by muwu on Jan 17, 2012 8:49 AM EST up reply actions  

Lopez is the most important player on this team because we have no one else to play in the post. Nets would have a better record right now if Dwill were injured instead of Lopez.

"Beware the Ides of March."

by Andy. on Jan 17, 2012 8:47 AM EST reply actions  

never thought of that

but I would have to agree. Famar can produce as a starter much better than any of Lopez’ replacements have

by Murse Mike on Jan 17, 2012 8:50 AM EST up reply actions  

Don't be too sure we'd have a better record if

Lopez was healthy and it was DWill who was injured.

The Nets record with Lopez right before the DWill trade was 17-40, or .293, which translates to a 4-10 record instead of 3-11 now. But remember that was with Harris and Favors, not with Gaines and Shelden. The opposing defense would collapse on Lopez as they do now with DWill. Not sure Farmar-Gaines could get him the ball as well.

DWill needs Lopez (or Howard). And Lopez would also need DWill.

by stenpoint on Jan 17, 2012 9:16 AM EST up reply actions  

I'm not too sure

it’s a hypothetical, but it makes sense to me

by Murse Mike on Jan 17, 2012 9:44 AM EST up reply actions  

The Nets record with Lopez right before the DWill trade was 17-40, or .293, which translates to a 4-10 record instead of 3-11 now. But remember that was with Harris and Favors, not with Gaines and Shelden.

What about Brooks, did he get hurt in this hypothetical scenario? Of course we would be better of if DWill was hurt instead of Lopez.

He has a 7-1 wingspan and averaged 7.1 rebounds in the Big East. He will be one of the top players when we look back on this draft 3 years from now. DWILL-of-the-GODZ June 3, 2011

by DWILL-of-the-GODZ on Jan 17, 2012 10:34 AM EST up reply actions  

You mean our record before D-Will came here last year.

That was pretty good. This team sucks man; neither B-Lo nor D-Will can do jack with this kind of talent around.

This is not a B-Lo vs D-Will thing. The team sucks, and for a reason at this point. At least we are lead to believe so.

We shall see what our team will look in Brooklyn sometime end of October.

by d2d on Jan 17, 2012 8:52 AM EST up reply actions  

I think our team would be pretty darn good if Lopez were healthy.

Dwill would be playing better also.

"Beware the Ides of March."

by Andy. on Jan 17, 2012 8:54 AM EST up reply actions  

I agree it would be better!!!

We saw flashes last year, with D-Will playing in one hand.

But still this is nothing what is expected entering Brooklyn.

I think that we are in good state, and I strongly believe that D-Will is not leaving, D12 or not.

Hopefully we’ll have D12 on board, but even if he does not come compare the options for D-Will.

- You got one of the better young centers in B-Lo.
- Pretty damn good rookie in SWAG.
- Plenty of cap (which in Newark means nothing, but in Brooklyn means gold)
- Loads of picks that can be turned into a good player, or used in draft.

Better days are coming, IMO.

by d2d on Jan 17, 2012 9:26 AM EST up reply actions  

That's just sad, but true.

DWill has been a tick above replacement this year. :(

Oh pissing blimey there's jam coming out of the walls!

by TWilliAM on Jan 17, 2012 8:52 AM EST up reply actions  

disagree

Nets Mets Giants All day Every day.
Beware the Lopez
NY Giants Tribute

by netsareboss on Jan 17, 2012 12:43 PM EST via iPhone app up reply actions  

I think more importantly

Isn’t one of the benefits of Lopez in a trade is that the Magic can then decide what to do with him? Unlike a Bynum who can walk after next season.

Magic will have the opportunity to feel the market out and match whatever other teams offer. Or decline it if they so choose.

Worst case for them, they get a huge salary dump out of this deal + lottery pick + MarShon Brooks + (rights to offer OJ Mayo best deal?).

Of course they get the same with Bynum + Gasol if they both leave Orlando, but no lottery pick or MarShon.

Section 18, Row 7 at The Rock!
"Your 2010-2011 New Jersey Nets - It Is What It Is"

by eLonepb on Jan 17, 2012 8:51 AM EST reply actions  

Mayo wouldn't go to Orlando

he would’ve had to be on the Nets’ roster already in order to be available to be traded by Mar15, 60 days needed

by Murse Mike on Jan 17, 2012 8:56 AM EST up reply actions  

Yes he can

In a straight up deal. Just not in one that has multiplayers.

Section 18, Row 7 at The Rock!
"Your 2010-2011 New Jersey Nets - It Is What It Is"

by eLonepb on Jan 17, 2012 8:59 AM EST up reply actions  

This is an absolute disaster.

What ever happened to taking care of your own? I get – and hate – this whole Dwight or Bust attitude, but what I don’t get is why it’s being reported that Brook wasn’t going to get a new deal to begin with, even without Dwight. WHY? He’s been our best player and is one of the most serviceable centers in the league. The most disturbing thing to me is this: “with Lopez an RFA, the Nets are gambling on another team making a max or near-max offer for Lopez,” which sadly I think is going to happen. If Dwight decides to bolt Orlando and go to a different team, how painfully ironic would it be for Brook to end up in Orlando as a signed free agent? I can’t say it’s impossible, nor can I say I will blame Brook. If I were Brook, I wouldn’t feel wanted right now. The Nets are slowly destroying themselves.

by KFM FITNESS on Jan 17, 2012 8:53 AM EST reply actions  

it's a business decision

The nets will match any offer on brook unless they sign Howard. Relax, dude.

I love the Nets...too bad they don't love me...

by BEB on Jan 17, 2012 8:57 AM EST via iPhone app up reply actions  

I hope you're right...

Sadly, I don’t know the meaning of the word “relax.” I just hope you’re right…everything I’ve been reading is not promising…

by KFM FITNESS on Jan 17, 2012 8:58 AM EST up reply actions  

Unless we get Dwight

I’m sure Nets will match whatever Brook gets.

by mvmt84 on Jan 17, 2012 8:59 AM EST up reply actions  

If Dwight isn't traded for Lopez

then the Nets could get Deron, Dwight, AND Brook together. But the only way to do that is to not extend Lopez until after they sign their other FAs, namely Dwight

by Murse Mike on Jan 17, 2012 9:00 AM EST up reply actions  

Certainly agree that Dwight coming via FA is certainly the best case scenario

Now I also see how having to deal with extending Lopez at the same time can be tricky… If Dwight were to come as FA I really hope things go swiftly and have both signed within first few days…

Basically you are saying we should sign all the FAs we are going to sign first because Lopez’s extension will put us over the cap, right? If not over, drastically reduce.

by mvmt84 on Jan 17, 2012 9:06 AM EST up reply actions  

Even if we miss out on Howard…I still can’t picture Dwill leaving.

The draft is stacked with bigs.

We would have:

Dwill
MarShon
Someone from Freeagency
An Athletic PFr with the top 3 pick
Brook Lopez

Plus that fifth year…$$$$

"Beware the Ides of March."

by Andy. on Jan 17, 2012 9:01 AM EST reply actions  

Do you see the look on his face?

the way he has played? what leads you to believe this?

by MrDollarBills on Jan 17, 2012 9:09 AM EST up reply actions  

Yeah I think he's gone gone

If we don’t get Dwight.

Section 18, Row 7 at The Rock!
"Your 2010-2011 New Jersey Nets - It Is What It Is"

by eLonepb on Jan 17, 2012 9:16 AM EST up reply actions  

The Nets would still have a good chance of keeping him

They will have MarShon, a high pick, Lopez, morrow, and cap room to sign a max FA. And with a rich owner with the ability to offer a front loaded max offer with HUGE signing bonus, it’s not out of the question to steal another team’s star RFA

The Jazz had to take out a loan to match the offer to Milsap, and his contract wasn’t anywhere close to max

by Murse Mike on Jan 17, 2012 9:25 AM EST up reply actions  

"sign a max FA"

Who?

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?page=FreeAgents-11-12

Section 18, Row 7 at The Rock!
"Your 2010-2011 New Jersey Nets - It Is What It Is"

by eLonepb on Jan 17, 2012 9:27 AM EST up reply actions  

exactly what I was thinking

who are they going to sign??

The Nets have ZERO chance of keeping him if they don’t get Howard. ZERO.

Deron’s foot is out of the door. You guys are in denial and I hate to see this because there will be a lot of broken hearts either come March of this summer

by MrDollarBills on Jan 17, 2012 9:38 AM EST up reply actions  

I'm not saying zero

But I do believe, and always have, that he’ll go to Dallas if we don’t get Dwight.

Section 18, Row 7 at The Rock!
"Your 2010-2011 New Jersey Nets - It Is What It Is"

by eLonepb on Jan 17, 2012 9:49 AM EST up reply actions  

Yeah I take it back.

We would still be VERY unproven….Wouldnt be appealing to Deron who wants to win now.

"Beware the Ides of March."

by Andy. on Jan 17, 2012 9:30 AM EST up reply actions  

With what bench though?

I’m not saying the bench will be dramatically better right away but another advantage of having D-Will and Dwight together is that it will lure decent vets smelling the ring, who would be willing to take a pay cut.

by mvmt84 on Jan 17, 2012 9:10 AM EST up reply actions  

Deron isnt happy. Life isnt about money. He doesnt want to rebuild. He doesnt want to lead

If we don’t get Dwight, he will and should leave .Wrong situation for him.

by orangeeater on Jan 17, 2012 9:12 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Agreed

Section 18, Row 7 at The Rock!
"Your 2010-2011 New Jersey Nets - It Is What It Is"

by eLonepb on Jan 17, 2012 9:17 AM EST up reply actions  

I'm screen-capturing this.

This is a first for me. I respect you as a poster.. so this made my day! (not sarcastic)

by orangeeater on Jan 17, 2012 9:18 AM EST up reply actions  

Haha

Section 18, Row 7 at The Rock!
"Your 2010-2011 New Jersey Nets - It Is What It Is"

by eLonepb on Jan 17, 2012 9:23 AM EST up reply actions  

I just think that the Nets wouldn't sacrifice Brook Lopez

if they didn’t have very strong assurances that Dwight is going to come here. This is another positive sign for the Nets, if Aldridge’s report is true.

2011-2012 season prediction: 22-44

And I'm fine with that. One of the original leaders of the "Dwight Howard, not Nono Hilario" movement.

by BigTom on Jan 17, 2012 9:07 AM EST reply actions  

The Nets have based their immediate future

on the HOPE that Howard comes here.

I wouldn’t be confident about anything, this could just be another blunder

by MrDollarBills on Jan 17, 2012 9:10 AM EST up reply actions  

im sure BK and ownership knows what they are going up against

if dwight fails they will have other scenarios to play out just like with dwill and carmelo

ITS A VVVVVVCCCCCCCCCCC THREEEEEEEEEEEEE

by Keysta101 on Jan 17, 2012 9:11 AM EST up reply actions  

I completely agree

You’re speaking my language, Mr. Dollar Bills. This is exactly what I have been saying all along.

by KFM FITNESS on Jan 17, 2012 9:13 AM EST up reply actions  

this could just be another blunder

What was the first blunder?

Not giving Nene a max contract offer? I’m glad they didn’t do that.

Or was the first blunder trading for Deron in the first place? I’m willing to accept the argument that we should have kept Favors and the pick that resulted in Kanter and built organically. But I recall you saying trading for Deron was a no-brainer because there was very little risk involved.

2011-2012 season prediction: 22-44

And I'm fine with that. One of the original leaders of the "Dwight Howard, not Nono Hilario" movement.

by BigTom on Jan 17, 2012 9:18 AM EST up reply actions  

the first blunder? we can start with Rod Thorn’s idiocy during his last two seasons as GM, and then work our way from there

by MrDollarBills on Jan 17, 2012 9:25 AM EST up reply actions  

but Tom

all I’m saying…there are too MANY factors swirling around here to be confident. Way too many

by MrDollarBills on Jan 17, 2012 9:28 AM EST up reply actions  

maybe

Dwill
Mayo
W chandler
Hump
Lopez

Bench
Brooks
D james
Drafts

by brickznujerz on Jan 17, 2012 9:14 AM EST via mobile reply actions  

I sincerely hope

Whoever we draft is better than Wilson Chandler, whom I’m not sure how we get. Is he FA this year?

by mvmt84 on Jan 17, 2012 9:16 AM EST up reply actions  

Chandler

Signing someone like Chandler would be a good move, but it would require emptying our pockets a little bit. I’m not too sure that BK would go for that since LeBron becomes a free agent in a few years and I’m pretty sure King has assurance that LBJ is on his way. Might as well wait it out and preserve cap.

by KFM FITNESS on Jan 17, 2012 9:17 AM EST up reply actions  

To us it is not necessary to Mayo. We need to develop talent of MarShon. Mayo is more expensive, they are comparable in attack,in it the potential of the good defender . Mayo can’t essentially strengthen us. This trade can occur only because MarShon will be a part of trade Howard.

I don't speak English

by RussianNets on Jan 17, 2012 9:14 AM EST reply actions  

Mayo would help us now and in the offseason

Mayo can start at SG and Brooks at SF.

Also, Mayo is an expiring who’d clear salary for next season (whether it be Morrow or Farmar) — which could be important in that super ideal scenario of getting Dwight in the offseason while also re-signing Lopez. And if Brooks (hopefully not) is traded with Lopez, at least we’d still have a starting SG.

by stenpoint on Jan 17, 2012 9:20 AM EST up reply actions  

I agree with RN

I like Mayo but he’ll probably hurt MarShon’s development

another mercenary player that will freeze the rookie out because he needs to make sure his stats are popping for this summer’s free agency

we need a small forward

by MrDollarBills on Jan 17, 2012 9:24 AM EST up reply actions  

We need ballers period

This team has zero ballers outside of Deron and Marshon, and Deron is playing like crap. Replacing Ammo or Farmar with Mayo will do nothing but help. It’s up to the coach to make it work( not really saying much). Not saying the Mayo is the cure, but just playing good basketball is more beneficial to Brooks’ development, than him averaging 19 points in 20 point blowouts. Marshon has convined me that he is going to get his regardless. I feel it’s more important for the team to play good basketball, with actual nba talent in close games. At worst it just means we get a gaurd than can actually dribble, pass and shoot. sigh*

OUTLAW > BROOK'S SHOE

by JKotrane on Jan 17, 2012 3:00 PM EST up reply actions  

Its a losing team and NJ means jack to him

I doubt he’s coming to a single game when bigger things are at stake in Russia.

by Proballxx on Jan 17, 2012 9:18 AM EST up reply actions  

I think he is a horrible owner

He has money and that helps. But I think he is a disaster. Not as bad as Ratner.. but the all about Brooklyn makes me think this really is all about the real estate deal. Build the team’s value (with stars) and them dump team to a new ownership group. Flip the asset and stroke his ego.

by orangeeater on Jan 17, 2012 9:21 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Major props

Finally somebody who doesn’t like the star chasing strategy goes after the guy who put that strategy in place. Thank you, orangeeater.

2011-2012 season prediction: 22-44

And I'm fine with that. One of the original leaders of the "Dwight Howard, not Nono Hilario" movement.

by BigTom on Jan 17, 2012 9:26 AM EST up reply actions  

The outrageous shedding salary to sign Lebron strategy...

…was instituted before Proky became the owner, pal. Remember 12-70?

by Proballxx on Jan 17, 2012 9:30 AM EST up reply actions  

We shedded salary to sell the team to a new owner

Ratner was losing money and decided to cut his costs by shedding salary.

2011-2012 season prediction: 22-44

And I'm fine with that. One of the original leaders of the "Dwight Howard, not Nono Hilario" movement.

by BigTom on Jan 17, 2012 9:32 AM EST up reply actions  

Give it a rest man

Dwight has ASKED TO BE TRADED TO THE NETS.

It’s not a pipe dream being sold by the franchise. They didn’t just make that up.

Section 18, Row 7 at The Rock!
"Your 2010-2011 New Jersey Nets - It Is What It Is"

by eLonepb on Jan 17, 2012 9:51 AM EST up reply actions  

i don't get it Mr.DB????

why are you so bitter and pessimistic??

by NJQuestCat on Jan 17, 2012 10:16 AM EST up reply actions  

We were trading long-term contracts (and most of our talent) for contracts that expired in 2010 regardless of consequence. The payroll didn’t go down much but it was obvious what the goal was.

This process started before Proky was even on the radar.

by Proballxx on Jan 17, 2012 9:37 AM EST up reply actions  

He's willing to spend...

…unlike all our other owners before, except maybe when we were owned by YankeeNets (which coincidentally was when we went to the Finals), so that automatically makes him one of our best owners.

I agree that his obsession with landing multiple superstars has landed us in this mess though, but fact is that there is an enormous need for us to field a competitive and exciting team for the first year in Brooklyn because that is our one chance to get out of the Knicks’ shadow.

Its just a tough situation for the team, especially since the strategy started before he became our owner.

by Proballxx on Jan 17, 2012 9:26 AM EST up reply actions  

In vain you so think. For it game it not business. He put up many years money in CSKA, this command was very strongly unprofitable. He loves this game. You awake him to see constant on matches when we awake with a competitive team

I don't speak English

by RussianNets on Jan 17, 2012 9:35 AM EST up reply actions  

this is all part of the plan c (sign Dwight in off season plan)

If this comes to fruition, and I believe it does because I don’t see Orlando trading Howard this season, the nets would automatically have a super team. Maybe even better because of our depth and draft ability.

by Benl1 on Jan 17, 2012 9:22 AM EST reply actions  

Sad state of affairs

when it becomes obvious that D-Will needs Brook more than Brook needs him!!

Lopez performed consistently with garbage around him

Deron plays like crap and checks out

Get well soon Big Disney when this plan blows up in the Nets faces you’ll get your money!!

by MrDollarBills on Jan 17, 2012 9:22 AM EST reply actions  

Don't be too sure

(same issue, so just copy-pasting this from reply above)

Don’t be too sure we’d have a better record if Lopez was healthy and it was DWill who was injured.

The Nets record with Lopez right before the DWill trade was 17-40, or .293, which translates to a 4-10 record instead of 3-11 now. But remember that was with Harris and Favors, not with Gaines and Shelden — would that mean an extra loss or two? The opposing defense would collapse on Lopez as they do now with DWill. Not sure Farmar-Gaines could get him the ball as well.

DWill needs Lopez (or Howard). And Lopez would also need DWill.

by stenpoint on Jan 17, 2012 9:26 AM EST up reply actions  

I never said that

I am talking about individual performance alone

The opposing defenses have collapsed on Brook every season he’s been in the league and his scoring average INCREASED year to year

Brook was productive offensively before D-Will, and he will after the bum leaves

by MrDollarBills on Jan 17, 2012 9:30 AM EST up reply actions  

Productive offensively but can't get enough wins

While DWill obviously needs quality bigs to fluorish, Brook would improve further and help us to wins if he has a PG like DWill, just based on the Nets record the years he’s been here. Brook can go 20ppg again and we’d still be a .300 team. But with DWill, he’d get his numbers or more and get us more wins as well.

by stenpoint on Jan 17, 2012 9:34 AM EST up reply actions  

point is, Lopez is productive with or without Deron, while Williams is GARBAGE with him

by MrDollarBills on Jan 17, 2012 9:35 AM EST up reply actions  

18 and 8 is garbage?

The 35% FG and 4 TOs sucks but going 18 and 8 without Lopez isn’t garbage.

If DWill were out and Lopez went 20 and 8, it still wouldn’t look amazing if we were 3-11.

by stenpoint on Jan 17, 2012 9:42 AM EST up reply actions  

Williams is playing like garbage point blank

you can try to spin it how you want, 18 pts on 35 FG% is garbage

4 TOs a game is GARBAGE

his play is as bad as his attitude

by MrDollarBills on Jan 17, 2012 9:44 AM EST up reply actions  

But let's not give him the ball in the 4th crunchtime

Especially after he just nailed a huge clutch shot to tie the game.

I’m hoping for a few more Farmar isolations and missed 3’s.

Section 18, Row 7 at The Rock!
"Your 2010-2011 New Jersey Nets - It Is What It Is"

by eLonepb on Jan 17, 2012 9:29 AM EST up reply actions  

That was ridiculous

Oh pissing blimey there's jam coming out of the walls!

by TWilliAM on Jan 17, 2012 9:30 AM EST up reply actions  

yeah they are

my neighbor used to raise pits in his basement when I lived in a bad neighborhood during my youth

weights attached to chain collars. good times.

by MrDollarBills on Jan 17, 2012 9:43 AM EST up reply actions  

we can talk about Brooks, and how the team’s veterans decided to freeze him out of the offense yesterday

by MrDollarBills on Jan 17, 2012 9:31 AM EST up reply actions  

Could of easily scored 30 yesterday

Thank you Avery for being so smart Face palm

by nwkiddnj on Jan 17, 2012 9:31 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Avery, Deron, Farmar

all at fault

I would think that Deron, being such a great leader, would say “hmm…this kid…yeah he’s balling…let me get him the ball in spots where he can score”

nah. why bother with that

by MrDollarBills on Jan 17, 2012 9:33 AM EST up reply actions  

I blame Avery more. He is the Head coach

And if we all remember in that game he can yell “get Deron the ball” pretty loud. I didn’t hear that for MarShon

by nwkiddnj on Jan 17, 2012 9:35 AM EST up reply actions  

Avery continued to play Deron off the ball and Farmar at point late in the 4th

Marshon didn’t get the ball. Coincidence? For all Deron’s bad play, he does look for Marshon, has no problem giving him space, and doesn’t freeze him out like Farmar. Just what I saw with my eyes.

by stenpoint on Jan 17, 2012 9:38 AM EST up reply actions  

you know what

you make a great point. No argument here, because he does.

Personally though…if he’s the leader…he should make it known that the hot hand should get the ball

he didn’t care enough, obviously.

by MrDollarBills on Jan 17, 2012 9:42 AM EST up reply actions  

I'm with you and everybody else who think Marshon should've gotten the ball late in the 4th

The kid is amazing and cool as ice. But Avery calls the plays. If DWill called the plays, some people here would be up in arms against Asst GM playing Asst Coach. It was Avery’s call, good or bad.

by stenpoint on Jan 17, 2012 9:47 AM EST up reply actions  

I would prefer that D-Will did assume more responsibility

because Avery’s play calling sucks

his offensive sets involve the wing players standing on the perimeter twiddling their thumbs while there is ZERO post presence on the floor.

These losses aren’t just all because we have little talent

by MrDollarBills on Jan 17, 2012 9:49 AM EST up reply actions  

Bright spots this year?

MarShon Brooks. Billy King and cheap tickets. FTW

by nwkiddnj on Jan 17, 2012 9:33 AM EST reply actions   1 recs

cheap tickets is an understatement

My coffee at Dunkin costs more than Nets tickets right now.

by JimmyLips on Jan 17, 2012 10:59 AM EST via iPhone app up reply actions  

here's a situation

say howard makes it to free agency but is still wavering on a decision and wants to go through all of his options (like lebron did) and his free agency drags out. at the same time, right when free agency starts, some team offers Lopez a huge contract. how long do we get to match or pass? because if this happens we would be in quite a pickle.

by Prash Ramani on Jan 17, 2012 9:38 AM EST via Android app reply actions  

I thought it was shorter now

Like 3 days or something.

Section 18, Row 7 at The Rock!
"Your 2010-2011 New Jersey Nets - It Is What It Is"

by eLonepb on Jan 17, 2012 9:54 AM EST up reply actions  

In order for the Nets to sign DH12 and retain Brook

Howard would have to sign immediately as soon as FA starts

with the way this dude waffles back and forth and diddles around, I wouldn’t expect it to go that smoothly.

by MrDollarBills on Jan 17, 2012 9:41 AM EST reply actions  

yeah

don’t take my word for it but I think that Brook can be signed to an offer sheet the moment FA begins

not sure how that impacts the whole cap hold thing

all i know is that if DH12 hits FA, he will take his sweet time, screwing over the Nets in the process

by MrDollarBills on Jan 17, 2012 9:50 AM EST up reply actions  

As soon as Lopez gets an offer

That offer replaces his cap hold, which is why we need to sign D12 ASAP. If he takes his time, and Brook gets an offer higher than his cap hold (likely) we’ll have to renounce Lopez to maintain the cap space to sign D12.

by TheNetsFan on Jan 17, 2012 10:10 AM EST up reply actions  

My next fan post will be ripping Prokhorov.. As Nets management reads the site, i encourage all to rec it

Prokhorov needs to be called out.

I’m sure it is complete coincidence.. and I have no false pretenses.. but shortly after my fanpost (on the rec list) ripped Proky last season… he announced he was coming to the US and walked away from the Carmelo talks

I dion’t claim or think my post mattered..

What does matter is he realizes we need more than an absentee owner

by orangeeater on Jan 17, 2012 9:44 AM EST reply actions  

Deron could just leave

Prokhorov giving him a stern glare will not matter one bit. This dude has been playing the Nets the entire time

non committal(and why should he be, all the Nets do is operate off of hope and empty promises), and his play reeks of a player that does not want to play for the team that he’s on.

Yeah yeah billy…i’ll be assistant GM…its a win win for me either way

by MrDollarBills on Jan 17, 2012 9:47 AM EST up reply actions  

true.. but Proky needs to take responsibility for his mess...

Im with you on Deron leaving.. but we need an owner to get pissed and involved,

Prokhorov does not understand the NBA at all. Nor does he care.

by orangeeater on Jan 17, 2012 9:51 AM EST up reply actions  

The guy stop all to criticise. You do not know Prokhorov. This person very serious. If it took the project under the name of Nets that it will make of it that that promised.

I don't speak English

by RussianNets on Jan 17, 2012 9:55 AM EST up reply actions  

Why Prok

Clearly he has more pressing things he is doing.

People need to stop pointing fingers at Proky.

He has appointed people to take care of the business operations.

Ownership has nothing to do with this.

Operations has nothing to do with this either. BKing has put us in a VERY GOOD spot. Yeah the Dwill trade was a risk but at the time it was WELL WORTH it. Now BKing has put us in a spot to get DWight which is WELL WORTH it. Now BKing could say to ORL forget about the Dwight trade, we are keeping our ASSETS.

Then LOOK over to DWILL – you are either IN OR OUT. IF you are OUT, DO YOU LIKE OKC? You want to win RIGHT. Three team trade DWill for Harden, IBAKA, and picks. Trade Westbrook somewhere else and get a PG back from other team.

BLAME NEEDS TO GO TO
AVERY for his lack of decision making.
DWill for his lack of leadership and shot making

by SIC One on Jan 17, 2012 9:59 AM EST up reply actions  

Go for it, but there will probably be a backlash; so be prepared. Prokhorov is still a sacred cow.

2011-2012 season prediction: 22-44

And I'm fine with that. One of the original leaders of the "Dwight Howard, not Nono Hilario" movement.

by BigTom on Jan 17, 2012 11:29 AM EST up reply actions  

Is Lopez really going to get a max offer if Nene didn’t?

by mytoemytoe on Jan 17, 2012 9:48 AM EST reply actions  

lopez will get marc gasols contract

"Beware the Ides of March."

by Andy. on Jan 17, 2012 9:48 AM EST up reply actions  

It would be great if Lopez got Gasol’s contract (same starting as Nene but 4 years instead of 5)

by stenpoint on Jan 17, 2012 9:55 AM EST up reply actions  

but really it depends on how he returns from injury.

"Beware the Ides of March."

by Andy. on Jan 17, 2012 9:56 AM EST up reply actions  

Lopez is eligible for a smaller max than Nene

starting at $14.5m. Nene could have started at $17.5m I think.

by Jack Handy Jr on Jan 17, 2012 10:47 AM EST up reply actions  

Isn’t Mayo just a way to add to the Howard trade package?

Lopez + Mayo + picks for Dwight

by mytoemytoe on Jan 17, 2012 9:53 AM EST reply actions  

Some feel he is

Some feel he’s a replacement for Brooks when he’s sent to Orlando.

Section 18, Row 7 at The Rock!
"Your 2010-2011 New Jersey Nets - It Is What It Is"

by eLonepb on Jan 17, 2012 9:56 AM EST up reply actions  

yeah me 2…

Brooks is cheaper…Orlando will demand Brooks IMO

"Beware the Ides of March."

by Andy. on Jan 17, 2012 9:57 AM EST up reply actions  

They would be crazy not to

Of course, Woj said that when Orlando starts talking deals for Dwight, “the conversation will be with LA”

Section 18, Row 7 at The Rock!
"Your 2010-2011 New Jersey Nets - It Is What It Is"

by eLonepb on Jan 17, 2012 10:00 AM EST up reply actions  

OJ Mayo’s second season at age 22:

17.5 per game in 38 minutes, .458 from the field, .383 from downtown, .809 from the stripe, 3.8 rebounds, 3 assists, 1 steal, 2 turnovers and 2 fouls.

I’ve never really had the opportunity to watch Mayo do his thing but the stats say they are actually similar players. Can anyone who has watched Mayo SIGNIFICANTLY comment on that?

by mytoemytoe on Jan 17, 2012 10:00 AM EST up reply actions  

Mayo was great early in his career

I remember being at games where he’d almost single handedly kill us. I don’t know why he’s seen his minutes shrink every year.

by TheNetsFan on Jan 17, 2012 10:14 AM EST up reply actions  

I just wonder whether Brooks can avoid that same path. His shot isn’t always going to fall and when it doesn’t he needs to be able to develop his off ball game

by mytoemytoe on Jan 17, 2012 10:18 AM EST up reply actions  

Brooks is bigger than Mayo

I think that helps a lot. Even if he has a bad shooting game, he still deflects passes & rebounds. If he can put some more muscle on, he can be a very good starter.

I do think he could benefit a lot from a coach that emphasizes ball movement. That’s where his game is really lacking. He needs to be able to set other players up, and score when being set up, not just in isolation. If we could bring back a guy like Eddie Jordan to be an assistant coach, I think he could really improve his game.

by TheNetsFan on Jan 17, 2012 10:27 AM EST up reply actions  

The coaching is holding this whole team back. Not to say they are supremely talented but they are incredibly unorganized as a unit.

by mytoemytoe on Jan 17, 2012 10:34 AM EST up reply actions  

With the date for Mayo to be re-tradable by March apparently having passed, that could be. Maybe BK’s just placed a reservation of Morrow for Mayo with Memphis for the trade deadline. Orlando won’t want Morrow because they already have Redick but they could like Mayo. Mayo’s expiring but will be an RFA, unlike Gerald Wallace who’ll be unrestricted.

by stenpoint on Jan 17, 2012 9:59 AM EST up reply actions  

He can be traded 1 for 1

Section 18, Row 7 at The Rock!
"Your 2010-2011 New Jersey Nets - It Is What It Is"

by eLonepb on Jan 17, 2012 10:01 AM EST up reply actions  

What happened?

He’s never been good at defense and he’s never been good at creating his own shot. He’s always been a lights out 3 point shooter when given room, and it appears he still is.

Section 18, Row 7 at The Rock!
"Your 2010-2011 New Jersey Nets - It Is What It Is"

by eLonepb on Jan 17, 2012 10:02 AM EST up reply actions  

Coach Joe, this is nothing new for Anthony Morrow. He is a one dimensional 3 point shooter who takes himself out of the offense many times just by being bad at other areas of the game.

by mytoemytoe on Jan 17, 2012 10:02 AM EST up reply actions  

yeah forgot about the lack of

defense, passing, ball handling, strength, quickness, etc

by stenpoint on Jan 17, 2012 10:05 AM EST up reply actions  

in a dream world....

we could call the knicks and talk about a landry fields anthony morrow trade. Some may scoff now with the way Fields is playing but he’s playing out of position at the 2 and we could use him at the 3. Too bad this scenario would never happen

by SamsHops on Jan 17, 2012 10:08 AM EST up reply actions  

Wow, not bad.

I think Fields for Morrow would be a really good swap for both teams.

by mytoemytoe on Jan 17, 2012 10:10 AM EST up reply actions  

Yes, that would be a good swap. Morrow would also fit with D’Antoni’s defensive philosophy.

by stenpoint on Jan 17, 2012 10:12 AM EST up reply actions  

He has always been a bench player

He also needs to realize – CATCH AND SHOOT. If you miss it, it is ok. Better to miss the 3pt shot then to TO a drive to the basket.

Morrow is only good for Korver, Capono, and House roll.

by SIC One on Jan 17, 2012 10:04 AM EST up reply actions  

He's not even catch and shoot

like other specialist shooters who can do it quickly off the screen, like say Korver or Redick. Morrow needs to be standing still and set when he gets the pass.

by stenpoint on Jan 17, 2012 10:07 AM EST up reply actions  

I agree with you there too

why have Dwill running around like a chicken without a head but Morrow isnt doing that too.

Imagine if both of them are doing that. I dont get it.

SMFH!!!!

by SIC One on Jan 17, 2012 10:22 AM EST up reply actions  

Morrow should have been in that game yesterday down the stretch.

Instead Farmar bricked a corner three that we needed. Morrow has showed he can hit a big shot in crunch time and i feel it was a major mistake by Avery to leave him on the bench.

by Pawley on Jan 17, 2012 10:05 AM EST up reply actions  

BACK TO THE YOUTH MOVEMENT

This looks like 2010 all over again.

I hope BKing is as MISGUIDED as Thorn was.

Mayo for Farmar and future pick get it done. Nightmares of Beasley for Dooling all over again.

DWill you dont want to be here. No problem. OKC for Harden, Ibaka, and Pick

Mayo, Brooks, Barnes, IBAKA, Lopez
Pick PG, Harden, Boj, JWill, Pick SF/PF

BROOKLYN, WE GO YOUNG!!!!!!!

by SIC One on Jan 17, 2012 10:03 AM EST reply actions  

Two things

1) if Dwill can play with Gaines and Farmar at the same time why not Dwill and Westbrook.

2) If that doesnt work, Bking should look for another Team hopefully one that is in the lottery and trade Westbrook to that team for their pick. I dont want Westbrook. he and Dwill are the same players. PGs that want to shoot. I preferred Dwill when he didnt think he was a shooting guard. Avery once again not learning from his mistakes. HARRIS. SMH!!!!!!!

by SIC One on Jan 17, 2012 10:16 AM EST up reply actions  

Sure Dwill can play w/ Gaines

or me for that matter. Neither is good idea. Both of them NEED the ball to be effective.

I don’t think Dwill thinks he’s a SG. I think he really hates being forced to play like one since we lack the fire power.

by mvmt84 on Jan 17, 2012 10:23 AM EST up reply actions  

He used to get

20 – 10 playing PG why does he have to play SG to get 20+ points.

That is what I DONT UNDERSTAND.

Paul plays PG and gets his points. Why does the have to play like a SG.

DRIVE THE BALL and KICK it out when you break the Defense. Let the SGs run around screens. I can see them doing it once and awhile but REALLY.

by SIC One on Jan 17, 2012 10:26 AM EST up reply actions  

The issue

Is that we need guys that we need more ball handlers on the court. Opponents trap DWill & force the ball out of his hands, but when he’s on the court with guys like Hump, Morrow & James, giving them the ball is a turnover waiting to happen.

Brooks has helped some as he can also handle the ball. Stevenson is an ok ball handler. Other than those two & our PGs, nobody can put the ball on the floor. It’s not an issue of wanting to play DWill at SG. It’s that he’s better suited to play SG than Farmar or Gaines.

by TheNetsFan on Jan 17, 2012 10:31 AM EST up reply actions  

Read below

BKing can get third team to get OKC another PF or whatever they need as VET help.

by SIC One on Jan 17, 2012 10:17 AM EST up reply actions  

3 reasons the magic dont trade Howard

1.Magic feel that are not getting good enough compensation
2.Owner wants to see them win a championship, best way would be with Howard this year.
3.CEO hasn’t drunk called him yet

by Benl1 on Jan 17, 2012 10:07 AM EST reply actions  

I saw on the NetsDaily twitter that DeAndre Jordan can’t be traded until 7/1, why is that? Is it because he was a restricted free agent or specifically because they matched an offer sheet?

Fire Brian Schottenheimer.
http://www.facebook.com/pages/1000000-Jets-fans-against-Brian-Schottenheimer/104252133024352

by J-Kay on Jan 17, 2012 10:13 AM EST reply actions  

Probably because he’ll be in the air until then. That man can fly

by mytoemytoe on Jan 17, 2012 10:14 AM EST up reply actions   2 recs

Sounds like David Aldridge is talking out of his butt

Reporting his opinion on the Nets interest in Lopez long-term. If we couldn’t get Dwight, there’s no doubt we’d re-sign Lopez.

by Anthony Perez on Jan 17, 2012 10:20 AM EST reply actions  

How about the Nets trade Avery Johnson for the expiring contract of Mike D’Antoni. If we’re not going to play defense we might as well play a bunch of offense.

by mytoemytoe on Jan 17, 2012 10:22 AM EST reply actions  

Hell NO

How about this

Trade Dwill to OKC with a third team

Fire AVERy

Hire Sloan. Sloan with these young guys would be great.

by SIC One on Jan 17, 2012 10:24 AM EST up reply actions  

Bring in Phil Jackson!

by njnets2010 on Jan 17, 2012 10:27 AM EST up reply actions  

No Thanks too

2010 all over again.

Go after Phil only to lose him to the Knicks.

No THANKS. Sloan or PJ or Elie.

by SIC One on Jan 17, 2012 10:28 AM EST up reply actions  

The Czar is the obvious choice to coach this team.

by mytoemytoe on Jan 17, 2012 10:30 AM EST up reply actions  

After seeing what D-Will has to offer as the main focus of defenses

I wouldn’t be surprised if the clippers emerge as Howard’s top pick because Deron looks like fools gold this far and needs Howard more than Howard needs him…. Oh well at least the nets are still on his list right?

by boogeewon on Jan 17, 2012 10:24 AM EST via mobile reply actions  

Damn really regretting

buying the Dwill Jersey and T-Shirt.

I usually customize my NETS stuff but SMFH!!!!!

by SIC One on Jan 17, 2012 10:27 AM EST reply actions  

I'm not buying any jersey

Until after the trade deadline. If we still have MarShon, I’m getting his jersey in the throwback form we’ll wear this year.

Section 18, Row 7 at The Rock!
"Your 2010-2011 New Jersey Nets - It Is What It Is"

by eLonepb on Jan 17, 2012 10:47 AM EST up reply actions  

Enlighten me

Why again are the Grizzlies willing to move Mayo for what you all perceive as lesser talent?

by NJINME on Jan 17, 2012 10:37 AM EST reply actions  

lol Parsons

Section 18, Row 7 at The Rock!
"Your 2010-2011 New Jersey Nets - It Is What It Is"

by eLonepb on Jan 17, 2012 10:38 AM EST reply actions   2 recs

IMAO!

McGee: UUGGGHHHHHHH Get OOFFFFFF!!!!!

"Beware the Ides of March."

by Andy. on Jan 17, 2012 10:40 AM EST up reply actions  

we shoulda picked him instead or jordan williams….doesnt look like jordan will ever see the floor.

"Beware the Ides of March."

by Andy. on Jan 17, 2012 10:45 AM EST up reply actions  

wow...smh

Niners,Nets,Reds & USC!!!

The Most Interesting Man In The World---->Mikhail Prokhorov!!!

by Kidd2Petrovic on Jan 17, 2012 11:43 AM EST up reply actions  

Per Rotoworld:
The Clippers and Magic have held no “serious discussions” about Dwight Howard since before the lockout.
A report from Chris Sheridan had Howard adding the Clippers to his list of preferred teams, but the Clippers haven’t spoken to the Magic in quite some time. We still don’t expect a resolution much before the March 15 deadline, and this certainly isn’t the last time we’ll hear of a development on the Howard trade front./blockquote>

I love the Nets...too bad they don't love me...

by BEB on Jan 17, 2012 10:39 AM EST reply actions  

The Clippers aren't an option

they aren’t trading Griffin, therefore the talk of him possibly going to LAC stops there.

by NetsKiNG on Jan 17, 2012 11:02 AM EST up reply actions  

I think if the Magic offer Howard for Griffin straight up....

….they would consider it. Dwight is still a bigger name, and a better player.

by Proballxx on Jan 17, 2012 11:07 AM EST up reply actions  

uh no

they would want Paul, 2 first rd picks, an expiring and take back Turkoglu….

by NJINME on Jan 17, 2012 11:12 AM EST up reply actions  

And Clippers would counter-offer Griffin for Howard, because...

….the Magic ain’t getting anyone better than Griffin back in any of the other trade proposals being floated around.

by Proballxx on Jan 17, 2012 11:13 AM EST up reply actions  

which is why Howard will leave as a FA

by NJINME on Jan 17, 2012 11:15 AM EST up reply actions  

I doubt it.

Face it, our chances at Dwight are getting slimmer and slimmer as Nets/DWill continues to stink and other teams get more attractive.

by Proballxx on Jan 17, 2012 11:17 AM EST up reply actions  

Griffin...

…would fit right into the Magic perfectly and help them compete THIS year, will stay a Magic for the foreseeable future, and still has tremendous upside.

No way they let that one go.

by Proballxx on Jan 17, 2012 11:20 AM EST up reply actions  

I can not see the Clippers consider Griffen for Dwight unless Sterling has completely lost his mind

Griffen is a little younger but more importantly much cheaper.Dwight may be a bigger name or better player now, but Blake isn’t to far behind in his second year

by SovietBrooklyn on Jan 17, 2012 11:45 AM EST up reply actions  

Horford and Noah as precedents

Back to the main thread. I understand why we are not signing Brook to an extension now, but am curious about what his market value will be. Some have said that he would be a max extension. I like Brook a lot, but don’t see anyone offering him that. Under the last and, theoretically at least, more lucrative CBA, Al Horford and Joachim Noah both got five year extensions for $60 million. Who knows what is going on with Noah this season, but Horford is a two-time all-star, albeit injured. I think that Brook’s market value is a lot closer to what these guys got than Rose’s deal.

58-8

by jabez on Jan 17, 2012 11:04 AM EST reply actions  

i think he'll command that

Not sure what the max is for him but he’ll get it or near that.

by 1stnamelastname on Jan 17, 2012 11:07 AM EST up reply actions  

OK, one vote for close to $95 million

Rose got $94.8 million over five years. Not sure why anyone would think Brook deserves that. Brook has never been an all-star much less an MVP, never played on a winning team, has an injury history, and his rebounding reputation around the league is poor. I don’t mean to knock the guy because as I’ve said I like him, but these are facts. I don’t think Brook will get much over $60 milllion over five.

55-11

by jabez on Jan 17, 2012 11:18 AM EST up reply actions  

he is not

eligible to recieve the same contract that rose was given

by watchoutBLo on Jan 17, 2012 11:19 AM EST up reply actions  

Good catch

This is an important point. The “Derrick Rose Rule” in the current CBA enables a player with coming off his rookie contract to sign for 30% of their cap if he appeared in two All-Star Games, was named to an All-NBA Team twice, or was named MVP. So the Nets could offer Brook a maximum of between $70 and $75 million for five years. Other teams could only offer a maximum of four years in the $55 to $60 million range. Please correct me if I am wrong in any of this.

This further supports my contention that Brook will get a deal in line with those signed by Horford and Noah—he is unlikely to turn down more money from the Nets (or Magic) than he could get elsewhere, especially after suffering a foot injury in his contract year.

55-11

by jabez on Jan 17, 2012 11:34 AM EST up reply actions  

SO can anyone tell me how this whole Dwight thing works IF in fact the Magic decide to lose him for nothing? What date can Dwight then go sign with a new team? I dont know if I can wait another whole summer.

"LeBron puts up great numbers, can't close w/o DWade. LeBricked 3 late 3s when shouldve been driving, getting to line. What else new?"

Yet casual basketball fans think he is a God, and would exhaust their entire squads to land him...

by Tim823 on Jan 17, 2012 11:13 AM EST reply actions  

I hope Dwight signs the deal first thing July 1st morning

Gives us better chance w/ other free agents, and some sense of… what’s the word I’m looking for… something we haven’t had for awhile… oh yeh, stability.

by mvmt84 on Jan 17, 2012 11:16 AM EST up reply actions  

I would wait for this, we wouldnt be a contender this year if we traded for Howard.

But with keeping all the assets and making the right moves the Nets could instantly catapult themselves into the elite

by Benl1 on Jan 17, 2012 11:17 AM EST up reply actions  

To be honest...

Diwght and DWill plus ANYONE is a contender.

"LeBron puts up great numbers, can't close w/o DWade. LeBricked 3 late 3s when shouldve been driving, getting to line. What else new?"

Yet casual basketball fans think he is a God, and would exhaust their entire squads to land him...

by Tim823 on Jan 17, 2012 11:21 AM EST up reply actions  

Wouldn't go THAT far

Will make PO but need one more star or bunch of starting caliber players to contend. IMO, we have one starter(borderline star if you would) in Lopez, two sixth men in MarShon and Hump, then few role players, then bunch of garbage.

by mvmt84 on Jan 17, 2012 11:29 AM EST up reply actions  

no it's not

If we had dwight on this team, we’re a 500 team period. Look at knicks, 3 all stars, and garbage around em, and they are struggling. This team needs a overhaul, with or without howard. We’re gushing over Brooks, who else do we have. Add Howard, then add everyone’s stats. We’d still be in the bottom 1/3rd of the league.

by HabPSU on Jan 17, 2012 11:30 AM EST up reply actions  

Respectfully disagree

Take Dwight off of the Magic and they are a turrible team, arguably worse than we are. With him, they are likely going to make the playoffs. We might have more scrubs than the Magic, but our top player is much, much better than anything the Magic has besides Dwight. You can’t just look at the stats, because Dwight takes so much of the defensive focus (e.g., Ryan Anderson doesn’t go for anywhere near 30 yesterday without the Nix collapsing on Dwight).

55-11

by jabez on Jan 17, 2012 11:44 AM EST up reply actions  

The Magic players other then Dwight, are what they are BECAUSE of Dwight. You see how open they all are on the perimeter? I mean thats literally all they do, is sit there until the D collapses!

"LeBron puts up great numbers, can't close w/o DWade. LeBricked 3 late 3s when shouldve been driving, getting to line. What else new?"

Yet casual basketball fans think he is a God, and would exhaust their entire squads to land him...

by Tim823 on Jan 18, 2012 10:19 AM EST up reply actions  

You know what makes me laugh

Why did Patrick Ewing tell Howard about how bad the fans are in NY and how they would turn on you? I unstand that orlando doesn’t want to lose Howard but I feel like Patrick is selling out. All those good years in NY and how the fans loved him and you say this? Also if the fans are so bad why was he so willing to take the Nets head coaching job?

Dre Day all day

by Dre Day41 on Jan 17, 2012 11:52 AM EST via mobile reply actions  

because Ewing

didnt know how to deal with the media. He was always a bad interview and reports used to hate it.

Dwight and Ewing are two different things. Dwight loves the Media and loves the camera. Where Ewing was an introvert.

Ewing is just still pissed that he asked for a trade.

by SIC One on Jan 17, 2012 11:56 AM EST up reply actions  

I understand

The fans in NY where but loyal to him and him to say that, wow. I don’t get it, Ewing can
Coach Lopez down in Orlando.

Dre Day all day

by Dre Day41 on Jan 17, 2012 12:00 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Excuse the errors, the fans in ny were nothing but loyal to Ewing.

Dre Day all day

by Dre Day41 on Jan 17, 2012 12:02 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

I agree

I hate the Knicks but I was a big fan of Ewing. Clearly he hasnt learned from his playing years. Ewing do you really want a coaching job in NY? SMH!!!!!

by SIC One on Jan 17, 2012 12:28 PM EST up reply actions  

The lack of respect for Lopez

Is astounding, Net fans truly dont appreciate how good the kid is. He had 1 bad year of rebounding and the media jumped on it and Nets fans followed. Rookie season he was 18 and 8 a nite.

Lopez Deron and Brooks is a damn good combo. There is no way we wouldnt be a .500 team by now.

The dream is Dwight coming as a FA. Resign Deron, extend Lopez.

Move 1of the picks or make a trade for a SF such as Batum.

Draft a good bench player with the remaining pick.

Pray Marshon stays this good and gets even better.

Win championship in 2014-15 season.

by power_njerz on Jan 17, 2012 12:25 PM EST reply actions  

Do you think POR is going to let Batum go?

We should of drafted him but of course we had Thorn running things then.

SMH!!! I used to support Thorn but what an idiot.

SMH!!! BKing has made a lot of mistakes in PHI but since he has been here he has done VERY GOOD things. I hope he continues this. crossing SIC fingers.

by SIC One on Jan 17, 2012 12:30 PM EST up reply actions  

time to build around marshon and brook!

im over trying to get superstars to come play for the nets

Damn D-Will...CP3 making you look like a joke right now...

by netsfanjerrylouis on Jan 17, 2012 12:52 PM EST reply actions  

I agree, a bunch of contracts comes off next year year.

I would put MarShon at the point if we lose D-Will. Build around Lopez and Brooks and I would keep Okur because I like his outside shot.

Dre Day all day

by Dre Day41 on Jan 17, 2012 2:10 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

i think he'll get a max contract

and he deserves it…brook lopez is a top 5 center imo… not to mention that he’s young and still developing…

Strike the Shepherd and the Sheep will Scatter

by JerseyFinest on Jan 17, 2012 12:54 PM EST reply actions  

DWill WAKE UP!!!

Was Deron worth it? Start playing like you belong! No Olympics for you the way you have been playing AND acting.

Get your ACT together. I am starting to miss Devin Harris.

by Netsfan62 on Jan 17, 2012 10:03 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

NetsDaily brings together up-to-the-minute news, analysis and opinion regarding the Brooklyn Nets in a comprehensive manner. Join the community and take part in the discussion.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Eb1431e0837d11e1abb01231381b65e3_6__1__small
Is Brooklyn and TheBarc Bigger Than Deron (or any one player)? I Think So. A Comprehensive Tour From 5/23/12

Recent FanPosts

Small
3-Team Trade?
Jay-z-beyonce-know9a7efe_small
Nets Season Tix, Lower Level All Access at a Discount
Batmananimated32_small
Western Conference Finals Preview: (1) San Antonio Spurs vs. (2) Oklahoma City Thunder
Small
Seasons End Fun Thread
Images_small
Draft Day Gear
Small
Magic Prepared to Deal Dwight?
2002-05-02-front-nets_small
Panel discussion mentioning Barclays Center
Small
so who else is worried about deron?
Ny_williams_nets_288v_small
What Really Grinds My Gears

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Jay-nets_100_small NetsDaily