Opinions on drafting Derrick Favors?
After going 12-70 it was made clear to us that we had a good chance at the number 1 pick John Wall. He seemed like the next face of the franchise to go along with Brook. On lottery night we found out that we would be getting the 3rd pick in the draft. With that pick we picked Derrick Favors, who obviously wasn't ready yet at only 19 years old. My problems with selecting Derrick was that after a 12 win season we picked a project. Usually you want the guy that will come in most ready and start to help the team. We passed on Wesley Johnson, Demarcus Cousins, Greg Monroe, E. Udoh and others. Projects like Derrick shouldn't go to high in the draft because those picks are usually the worst teams who need a player. Choosing a project can be a huge sucess or huge failure because you are using that draft pick above proven talent.
Just a few picks that were expected a lot from and became "busts" in terms of selection
Tyrus Thomas and Hasheem Thabeet
What I dont trust in Derrick Favors is his determination, he seems quiet. He hasn't demanded the ball, from his bad play he doesnt seem to care. Doesnt seem to have the drive. He has zero offense, and okay defense. Denver doesnt even want him anymore after a couple of PRE SEASON games that shows you something.
If we had chosen Demarcus Cousins where do you think Favors would have slipped to? I dont think Kings would have drafted him especially with them saying he seemed out of shape. I think he could of easily slipped to 8-10.
I hope we made the right choice, I dont think so.
142 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Kings would have drafted him 100%
Assuming he would be a defensive presence that we sorely needed.
"We're not talking about me and Darko in the same sentence." - Chris Webber vs KAHN!
by caseycheesecake on Oct 14, 2010 4:34 PM EDT reply actions
The T-Wolves wanted him, too, I believe.
by calling all toasters on Oct 14, 2010 10:28 PM EDT up reply actions
Oh.
Then we would have been screwed.
Thanks be to Kahn.
"We're not talking about me and Darko in the same sentence." - Chris Webber vs KAHN!
by caseycheesecake on Oct 14, 2010 11:10 PM EDT up reply actions
I still think our pick should've been Wes Johnson
Although I believe in Favors, when a team is 12-70, they need to draft an NBA ready player. The Nets relied too heavily on free agency. I liked the additions of Murphy and Anthony Morrow, but other then that, we struck out. Even though it is water under the bridge, we could’ve had Wes and Amare this offseason. Nevertheless, we picked him and will have to live with it. By January, I would like to see Favors production go up (but he is a 2-3 year project)
PS: If we drafted Wesley then we wouldn’t have had to pay that ridiculous contract to Travis Outlaw.
That was the case for Johnson
immediate impact but limited upside. So we’ll see in two years if he is near the top in terms of ratings among his class. I would bet he will be middle of the pack, my opinion. But definitely not a bust, my concern with him is he has already had two injuries. He doesn’t seem to have the body type to endure the grind
I don't think NBA readiness should really be a consideration, unless we really thought Bron Bron was coming.
The reality of the situation was that even with Wall, we were unlikely to go from 12 wins to anything better than .500 (best case scenario). The team did the right thing by drafting the guy they thought would be the best player in 3 years. Now we just have to hope that he has the motivation to work in practice and really improve.
by Stephen Schmidt on Oct 15, 2010 8:51 PM EDT up reply actions
I still would draft him
Getting favors is like rolling the dice, he can be from a 1-6. Settling for an “NBA ready” player would equate to say a 3 or 4 but no chance of anything higher. The Nets are not ready to compete right now, there are too many good teams out there. Why not settle for the future and the potential “6” of Favors? Getting an NBA ready player would never help us, we would still be a fringe playoff team with them.
~AC24
My original, and strongest feeling is that IF we got the first pick, it would be Wall(and man am I sad we missed out on him after that season) and IF we didnt get the 1st, even though I like Turner, Favors and Johnson, I didnt think they would be anything good enough to keep. I feel like we should have traded the pick before the draft if they werent going to be an absolute guarantee, like Wall seems to be.
I think/hope we made the right choice
While his quiet demeanor does scare me, his athletic gifts and will to work are very very big plus signs in his favor. THAT is where I think all the KG and Duncan comparisons come out from, both of those guys came into the league and they worked their way, ALL THE WAY into being arguably a couple of the best to ever play their position. Right now i am cringing at his performance and I am noticing the level of play other rookies picked after him has shown, but we picked Favors and im all in to see him develop into a Howard jr type of force for us….I just really hope he starts showing us SOMETHING so i can stop looking around, feeling dumb for supporting him this much.
This is how the top 10 picks in the draft have produced in the preseason so far
Everyone’s played at least three games, nobody has played more than five.
John Wall – 15.8ppg 7.8apg
Evan Turner – 12.5ppg 7.2rpg 3.2 apg
Derrick Favors – 4ppg 3.8rpg 0.8bpg
Wes Johnson – 10ppg 2.3rpg 1.8apg
DeMarcus Cousins – 16.4ppg 9.6rpg 0.8bpg
Ekpe Udoh – hasn’t played yet
Greg Monroe – 9.5ppg 4.5rpg 0.3apg
Al-Farouq Aminu – 8.2ppg 3.3rpg
Gordon Hayward – 7ppg 2rpg 2apg
Paul George – 4.3ppg 3.8rpg 0.8apg
All this tells me is Wall, Cousins, and Griffin (15.7ppg 11.5rpg through four games) are the front-runners for Rookie Of Year. Then again, anyone who pays attention to college basketball should’ve known that already.
Haven't seen much of any of these rookies play...
But I would think they are being used as a primary player (Wall, Cousins, Turner) where Favors is playing caddy to Lopez, Harris and T-Will. The Nets will ruin Favors in their quest to keep Lopez “happy” or as constant trade fodder for the likes of Carmelo, CP3 and whoever else pops up and strikes their fancy…
Rookie preseason stats really don't mean much
I really wouldn’t put too much into cumulative numbers wFavors until the deadline anyway, as he’s unlikely to get serious minutes prior to then unless we have an injury.
by Stephen Schmidt on Oct 15, 2010 8:59 PM EDT up reply actions
even if he is a 2 yr project
so what? In 2/ 3 year he’ll be putting up KG numbers. we didnt get wall that sux , but we didnt need turner at all cause Twill is better than turner, Cousins is a Center not a pf, brook is a Center not a PF, we didnt need another Center not when u have an allstar Center. If anything the sixers messed up for not taking Cousins…thats who they should have drafted, as far as SF we can always get those, but we needed a Long term PF who has all the makings of a dynasty PF for the NETS, and thats exactly what we got. We all have to be patient…you mention another rebuilding year…of course it is, you don’t go from 12 wins to playoffs, statistically that does not happen. We have the makings of a great team. fans just need patience
listin guys
favors is going to be good, we’re not contending for more than the 8th seed this year at best, whats the rush?
the sky is falling
so we have to hurry up
"Anthony Randolph has hall of fame skills" - GALLO!
by MrDollarBills on Oct 15, 2010 2:30 PM EDT up reply actions
2012 is coming
The world is going to end
by Stephen Schmidt on Oct 15, 2010 8:54 PM EDT up reply actions
Favors
We can’t judge Favors right now for many reasons.
He is only 19
He went to GT. Its not the same as going to Kentucky trust me
The Nets are a young team that doesn’t know how to play together.
Favors isn’t getting the ball in the post. He has shot mostly jumpers.
Favors is more of a defensive player than a scorer like Cousins
I’m starting to think Cousins would have better fit for the Nets for 1 reason.
The Nets needed a PF right now and Cousins could have started with Brook right now.
Brook has an outside shot and he can drive to the basket.
At worst the Nets could have drafted cousins and used him as trade bait like they are doin with Favors.
Favors will be good but it might not be until game 30
I still think Cousins was the right choice
But, I have hope in Favors. I think he will pan out within 3 years.
Dear Sucker I Mean Met Fan
Thank you for your support if you thought this season was tough to swallow wait til next year. Thanks, The Pons.
-TheKid08
what good does cousins do for the nets, its like drafting to stay exactly where you are and clog your center position
the nets needed a PF to pair brook up with, a rebounding, defending type PF, a front court of Lopez and Cousins wouldnt get the ball enough for each to put up their respectable numbers
The Nets just need talent, regardless of position
Position should be a concern only if two guys are of equal talent, at this point we just aren’t good enough to worry about fit. Good players will get minutes and be worth more via trade when we are actually looking to construct a championship roster.
by Stephen Schmidt on Oct 15, 2010 8:56 PM EDT up reply actions 3 recs
this would be relevant only if we knew Denver would be shopping melo, otherwise brook is the better center and will have the better career, and they wouldn’t play well together as their games are to similar and one would be wasted and never receive enough playing time, and would become a trade chip that isn’t worth full value due to the clogged front court, and what, then you hope that trade yields you a superstar, which with DC work ethic and attitude would be rarer than Favors becoming one himself, so i consider the nets move to be well justified and the best for the future of the organization
Don't Do Me No Favors - I wanted Run DMC
Rod Thorn has not drafted (or traded for) a stud at the Power Forward position since K-Mart was allowed to leave as a free agent. Coincidence?
Given the Nets need for big men, you had to go with Cousins. He was the most NBA-ready and best big man coming out.
Why draft a project when you can pick up someone that can step in and produce right away? Cousins has been described as a “6-11 Charles Barkley.” Who passes on that?
When a franchise-player stares you in the face, you take him! They had ’em both in for a workout together like other teams where Cousins clearly dominated.
Rod’s excuse for not opting for him was that he had too many red flags vis a vis anger management issues (so has all-Pro Rasheed Wallace); That he wasn’t a complement to Brook Lopez because he was also a center (Cousins plays the 4 and Lopez can play the 4 like Duncan when Cousins mans the 5); And that he was “high maintenance.” "Melo isn’t?
The last excuse was Avery Johnson’s as well. He wanted a “low maintenance” player! Fine, How ‘bout a corpse? A player that plays like he’s dead is of no use. Charles Oakley made his presence felt. So does Cousins. Favors resembles Stromile Swift so far.
If Avery thinks that selecting Favors over Turner was a no-brainer, than what happened to Cousins over Favors? A good thing Avery wasn’t given the GM’s hat as well!
by The Ghost of Dr. J on Oct 14, 2010 8:30 PM EDT reply actions
i really don't see cousins as a long term investment type of player
he’s gonna be one those players who are gonna be playing for multiple teams in his career.
ya except favors is 19 years old while yi is what like 30?
by Sparklespice on Oct 16, 2010 12:17 AM EDT up reply actions
Who here has a time machine to see into the future? No one can say who will be better Favors or Cousins.
But right now, where we all are, in the present not the unseen future…Cousins should have been the pick!
Favors might turn out better than Cousins but NOBODY KNOWS THAT NOW.
We can only go by what is known.
I want to see favors when his body is fully developed… He still needs to grow and put on Lots of muscle. Physically he looks alike hes going to become a great player.
I want to know how they’re developing favors. If I was his trainer I wouldn’t even focus post moves or jumpshots. I always hear the nets talking about hus jump shot… We don’t need him shooting.
1.I would make favors shoot free throws for 4-5 hrs daily.
Once he starts hitting free throws consistantly then he can move to more complicated stuff.
But if favors makes his free throws and plays agressive I can see him score 10ppg. If he improves his offense just imagine…
"I want to win, I want the team to win and I'm in complete control."
-Coach Avery Johnson.
by Andy. on Oct 14, 2010 11:12 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
if he isn't doing that good now what makes u think he is goin 2 do good later on into his career
check the recent year of players from the lottery. its either they start off good or become a bust.
kobe is an exception.
Basically a Noah in PF form.
That’s pretty good.
"We're not talking about me and Darko in the same sentence." - Chris Webber vs KAHN!
by caseycheesecake on Oct 15, 2010 12:54 PM EDT up reply actions
i still think favors is going to do well
he passes well for a big man…hes strong…he is a good finisher….athletic tools to get the job done…defensive mentality….rebounding mentality.
he just needs to work on technique, positioning, confidence…and hes good to go
"I want to win, I want the team to win and I'm in complete control."
-Coach Avery Johnson.
Time to be real...
I’ve been reading what everyone here has to say about Derrick Favors since he’s been drafted- and I have to say that right now you guys are being extremely optimistic. We’ve seen him do nothing so far. Granted,it’s only preseason, but as someone else already pointed out, look at how well some of the other rookies are doing. I attended the open practice. The guy looked okay. All of this “he has tremendous upside” has got to stop, EVERYONE in the NBA had upside at some point. I like the enthusiasm, but the fact that so many people on these forums weren’t willing to part with “upside” for Carmelo Anthony shows that you guys may not know what your talking about.
Don’t take it personal all your Favors lovers, it’s just the truth. He’s not producing. Personally I don’t understand the point of drafting someone that requires a waiting period in order to see production. Once the regular season starts, if Cousins and Wes Johnson still out performing Favors by Xmas, it will be safe to say he was not worthy of the 3rd overall pick.
by CraigyMuscles on Oct 15, 2010 12:04 AM EDT reply actions 2 recs
+1
All of this "he has tremendous upside" has got to stop, EVERYONE in the NBA had upside at some point.
"Sometimes it's the people. Any player can play defense, but not every player will play defense. Sometimes it's a lack of perseverance." - A. Johnson
by kv on Oct 16, 2010 2:18 AM EDT up reply actions
Name one?
Kwame Brown.
"Sometimes it's the people. Any player can play defense, but not every player will play defense. Sometimes it's a lack of perseverance." - A. Johnson
so you go back a year short of a decade, that shows the rareness,and in defense of Brown he was progressing well until he injured his foot, I remember him putting up 30 and 19 on sacramento the divac/webber front court.
Give me a break. The Lakers gave him every chance in the world.
It had nothing to do with his foot. It had to do with what was between the ears. Just like it looks like with Favors.
"Sometimes it's the people. Any player can play defense, but not every player will play defense. Sometimes it's a lack of perseverance." - A. Johnson
haha so from watching preseason you have done a psycho analysis of this kid, ok Dr. KV
sometimes you just sound like your’e trying too hard
And like Brown, Favors ALSO will have some good stat games, but
very likely will not deserve his pick position.
"Sometimes it's the people. Any player can play defense, but not every player will play defense. Sometimes it's a lack of perseverance." - A. Johnson
Name another one?
Emeka Okafur.
Another one?
Tyson Chandler.
"Sometimes it's the people. Any player can play defense, but not every player will play defense. Sometimes it's a lack of perseverance." - A. Johnson
preseason games mean squat
let them play actual games first.
Anyway, Favors was already projected to be a work in progress, Why are everybody so surprised with his showing?
Interesting?
More like typical.
by calling all toasters on Oct 15, 2010 11:20 AM EDT up reply actions
exactly
I’ll refrain because I’ve been warned already today, but it doesn’t take a mind reader to figure out what my thoughts are about this fanpost
"Anthony Randolph has hall of fame skills" - GALLO!
by MrDollarBills on Oct 15, 2010 2:02 PM EDT up reply actions
ooo what terrible thoughts
you have been warned
Still a good pick
But there are a looot of things he has to work on. And his ceiling doesn’t seem to look as high as it once did. If he turns out to be a good role player, that’s a success already for me
he is the youngest player in the league
lets see how he plays during the regular season, he “could” be the perfect compliment to Brook and the Nets would have one of the strongest and most talented front courts in the league. Plus Favors needs to grow into his body and put on a lot more muscle. Physically he will be a beast by year 3.
by Yi Of Little Faith on Oct 15, 2010 5:43 AM EDT reply actions
How come no one thinks about the money involved with a project pick.
By 3 years Lopez will be earning a max contract at the same time Favors will be getting an extension up to 12 million or more a year. How will the nets pay for this? The great thing about NBA ready rookies is that they’re cheap for their production. You can spend your money to fill other spots.
I really don't see the age excuse
What, so when he’s 20, what’s the excuse then? If John Wall or DeMarcus Cousins screw up, do they get the excuse that “they’re only 20?” No, they don’t get that luxury. but is there a large age or experience gap between them or Favors? They both have 1 year of college experience, they all played high school basketball and AAU basketball. It’s not like we’re talking a 10 year age gap here, it’s an age gap of often just a few months
by muwu on Oct 15, 2010 6:08 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Well, he's not 20.
In a year if he’s still terrible, then its fair to label him a bust. Right now, he’s a kid, one of the youngest players in the league. He gets a little slack as he tries to learn and develop his game on top of learning how to deal with the pressure.
Cousins Cousins Cousins Cousins Cousins
Cousins Cousins Cousins Cousins Cousins Cousins Cousins Cousins Cousins Cousins Cousins Cousins Cousins Cousins Cousins Cousins Cousins Cousins Cousins Cousins.
Do I have your argument right?
Because Cousins, as a freshman, was the most productive player in the NCAA last year, Favors must be held to a standard by which Shawn Kemp, Kevin Garnett, Marcus Camby, Karl Malone, Gerald Wallace, Jermaine O’Neal, and many others would be judged as miserable failures. Not to mention all the other bigs who weren’t even playing pro ball until they were 21 or 22.
by calling all toasters on Oct 15, 2010 11:34 AM EDT up reply actions
No
Why is being 19 an excuse, when other guys who are only months older don’t get that excuse? Does he have significantly less experience than other guys? Is it a large age gap?
Because even great bigs can take a long time to develop. Sometimes even longer than their first preseason! It’s not an “excuse”— it’s a fact. I’m sorry that your hero Cousins “doesn’t get that excuse” (although, of course, he WILL get it when he has a weak series of games, but no matter). Cousins’s offensive game developed remarkably early, which has NOTHING to do with whether Favors will be a star or not. Don’t be bitter. Go root for Cousins and enjoy. All this hating on Favors is going to wear you out, since he may well be here for ten years.
by calling all toasters on Oct 15, 2010 12:11 PM EDT up reply actions
yeah
Kings board is over yonder. I’ll root for and support Derrick Favors in his development and career as a Nets Power Forward
"Anthony Randolph has hall of fame skills" - GALLO!
by MrDollarBills on Oct 15, 2010 2:28 PM EDT up reply actions
Getting a little tired of...
that attitude that if you don’t question the team, you shouldn’t be a fan of it.
I’ve read a handful of your posts, and keep seeing this retort. You come into posts you don’t like, and then tell people to stop being Nets fans for it. How about instead of telling people to be Kings fans or Philly fans or walk if they aren’t as fan-friendly as you, why don’t you ignore what you don’t like and not take it so personally.
There’s some more reasonable advice then your doling out.
We are all Nets fans here. Most are hoping that the Nets become winners with Favors, the Rod Thorn lateral move to Philly though was really strange, and how if Favors was to be trade bait for a superstar, why didn’t we get a ready-now Cousins? It makes sense, whether you like it or not.
I’d have rather traded Cousins and 2 picks then Favors, Harris, (an expiring contract, and 2 picks (which is what we were offering towards the desperate end).
hey
why don’t you ignore what you don’t like and not take it so personally.
take your own advice son.
And I never told anyone to stop being a Nets fan, but these silly assed, “OMG!! HE’S A BUST!” reactions to Favors, who everyone knew was going to take some time to develop, are flat out over the top and ridiculous, and I’ll call people on it because I think that it’s absolutely stupid and uncalled for.
We are all Nets fans here. Most are hoping that the Nets become winners with Favors, the Rod Thorn lateral move to Philly though was really strange, and how if Favors was to be trade bait for a superstar, why didn’t we get a ready-now Cousins? It makes sense, whether you like it or not.
I have no problem with questioning this, I have already said that the Nets front office has handled this situation VERY poorly.
I can list several reasons as to why the Nets didn’t want to draft Cousins, position duplication and maturity/conditioning/defensive issues are the main things. I just think that it reflects very poorly on this fanbase if we’re ready to quit on Favors before the season even starts.
At least give him a chance to prove himself before folks start crying about not drafting Cousins, who needs a damned babysitter at the age of 20 years old.
"Anthony Randolph has hall of fame skills" - GALLO!
by MrDollarBills on Oct 15, 2010 5:04 PM EDT up reply actions
Fans are like this everywhere, in every sport
You and I both know the quickest way for fans to pipe down about Favors….Favors playing his way into their hearts and minds.
You have to become a good player or a star yourself. No one becomes one simply by being anointed.
Can fans be short termed and negative? For sure! Winning and consistency can ease that. Bandwagons are unavoidable.
And I agree that Favors was the better pick if the plan was to keep him long term. The strange thing was we were told that one of the reasons to pick Favors was “trade bait potential because of his immense potential,” but I think having an NBA ready 20 year old center from Kentucky would have been far better trade bait.
And, with hindsight, now knowing that we got the taskmaster Avery Johnson, Cousins could have been trained hard and fit to boot.
Here’s a twin tower team for the ages:
Duncan and Robinson: The Twin Towers (1997–2003)
They won two Championships in the 1998-1999 season and the 2002-2003 season.
thought it was PGs who take a long time to develop
PFs a like baking cookies by comparison
hmmm
Well, Billups certainly was a late-blooming #3 pick. Other top PGs that took until their mid-20s? None come to mind for me. And there’s been a run of very good young ones lately (Rose, Evans, Collison, etc.). So… maybe. Since excessively large people are more prone to motor slowness and awkwardness, my general take is that they are more likely to be instantly overwhelmed by the speed of the pro game. Smaller players may get overpowered but they don’t look lost, so they aren’t seen as “busts.”
Another factor might be that a number of “late-bloomers” are outstanding defenders. Perhaps (contrary to conventional wisdom that defense is all about motivation) offense is easier to develop at the pro level than defense. But that’s just my speculation.
by calling all toasters on Oct 15, 2010 4:22 PM EDT up reply actions
Steve Nash...
…spent several years caddying for Kevin Johnson and Jason Kidd at Phoenix, and was actually horrible in his first couple of seasons as a Mav.
muwu
what did you expect when it was known even before we drafted him that it would take time for him to develop?
"Anthony Randolph has hall of fame skills" - GALLO!
by MrDollarBills on Oct 15, 2010 2:27 PM EDT up reply actions
Everyone expected him to be raw
But we at least expected him to be ahead of other rookies on defense. I mean, his team defense at least was good in GTech, and yes, he needs an adjustment period to the NBA, but he should at least be somewhat competent at it because that was what he was supposed to be good at
I think the case has been made but even with the polish
that Cousins already had. It accelerated his growth to have John Wall and Calipari. Putting Favors in that spot would have been interesting. Favors did not have any play-makers, was not the number one option, and had another more polished low post 4 already on the team in Lawal. People mention the age but it was situational moreso.
Why is being 19 an excuse, when other guys who are only months older don’t get that excuse?
He only gets that excuse as long as he is a Net. The minute he isn’t a Net he is a walking bust.
He’ll also get the “he’s only 20” excuse, and the “he’s only 21” excuse, and maybe even the “he’s only 22” excuse.
"Sometimes it's the people. Any player can play defense, but not every player will play defense. Sometimes it's a lack of perseverance." - A. Johnson
by kv on Oct 16, 2010 2:21 AM EDT up reply actions
he's more of a shawn kemp then a KG
i think his skill set will transform him into a Kemp type player more then a KG type.
kemp only averaged 6.5ppg & 4rpg in 14mins per game…. in his first year playing in 81 games
IMO their games are very similar.
Kemp can dribble behind the back to avoid a guard trying to steal the ball and go the length of the court to dunk on someone...
I bet Favors can’t do that after 7 years…
by jirohkanzaki on Oct 15, 2010 11:23 AM EDT up reply actions
later in his career he could
Kemp wasn’t that skilled early in his career. he could jump out of the gym & run the floor thats about it. he learn the other things. youtube some videos.
Kemp also knew how to play in pro basketball games..
….while high off of cocaine. Derrick will probably never learn that skill as well.
"Anthony Randolph has hall of fame skills" - GALLO!
by MrDollarBills on Oct 15, 2010 4:44 PM EDT up reply actions
The crazy thing is even if you are exaggerating some people who reply to you believe that you aren't...
What does that tell us about how Favors suck right now? LOL
by jirohkanzaki on Oct 18, 2010 7:20 PM EDT up reply actions
Are we going to over-scrutinize every thing this kid does from now on?
Just let me know now so I can avoid fanshots.
might as well avoid the blog's comments section in general
we’ve been infected with a severe case of the kneejerk virus.
"Anthony Randolph has hall of fame skills" - GALLO!
by MrDollarBills on Oct 15, 2010 2:29 PM EDT up reply actions
Memphis Fan Here....
I’ve been following this page for awhile to see what you guys are saying about Favors. One thing that I will definitely say is that Derrick Favors should not be in the same sentence as Hasheem Thabeet. Thabeet is truly terrible and we took him 2nd overall. But, I think that one thing that most people on here need to remember is that big men have the toughest time to adjust to the NBA. Very few NBA big men are NBA ready. Typically the players that are have spent more than 1 year in college. It seems to me that he’s having a tough time adjusting. But, some of you guys and I will are a shame. It’s one thing to be dissapointed with him but, if anything you guys should still be supporting him instead of saying that he won’t be good at all. I know that most of you guys on here are at least giving him the benefit of the doubt.
by SonofMemphis on Oct 15, 2010 11:28 AM EDT reply actions 4 recs
i'm rec'ing this post. thank you sonofmemphis
But, I think that one thing that most people on here need to remember is that big men have the toughest time to adjust to the NBA. Very few NBA big men are NBA ready. Typically the players that are have spent more than 1 year in college. It seems to me that he’s having a tough time adjusting. But, some of you guys and I will are a shame. It’s one thing to be dissapointed with him but, if anything you guys should still be supporting him instead of saying that he won’t be good at all. I know that most of you guys on here are at least giving him the benefit of the doubt.
It’s an absolute embarassment that a Memphis Grizzlies fan had to come on here to say this. And then folks wonder why Keyon Dooling blasted this franchise and the fans in public as soon as he got the hell out of here.
5 preseason games. FIVE. I’ve never been this disgusted with the comments on NetsDaily until this week.
Now I see why players would rather play for the Knicks than the Nets.
"Anthony Randolph has hall of fame skills" - GALLO!
by MrDollarBills on Oct 15, 2010 2:18 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
This is exactly backwards
No one expects a lot of victories from us right away and we have no hope of contending for at the very least 2 years. Now is the perfect time to let the young players play and develop.
by calling all toasters on Oct 15, 2010 4:25 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
okay, tell us...
….how you’d have this team contending right away.
smh
"Anthony Randolph has hall of fame skills" - GALLO!
by MrDollarBills on Oct 15, 2010 4:47 PM EDT up reply actions
dude
YOU ARE ALREADY ASSUMING THAT FAVORS WILL BE A BUST. BASED OFF OF 5 PRESEASON GAMES.
That does NOT compute. Sorry.
"Anthony Randolph has hall of fame skills" - GALLO!
by MrDollarBills on Oct 15, 2010 4:48 PM EDT up reply actions
Favors was drafted because the Nets had thought that they would get someone big in free agency
Why get someone thats ready that wont get playing time. They wanted Bosh, Lebron, Boozer ex but got none. Favors wasnt the pick the nets wanted had they known they wouldnt receieve any all stars in free agency. The worst team in the league walked away with the least in free agency. We picked Favors under THORN, we had the worst season ever under THORN, we traded vc and rj for people that arent even here anymore under THORN. Thorn lost his touch he doesnt know what hes doing anymore. Cousins or Johnson should have been the pick. Nothing changes my mind, give me a PF that has come in with the worst stats of the top 10 free agents in pre season that became a star.
You are making that up
If anything, getting a free agent would make you want to get the more finished player in the draft so you can contend immediately.
by calling all toasters on Oct 15, 2010 5:28 PM EDT up reply actions
It's not entirely a matter of perspective
If we got LeBron (which was the primary goal) they would need a big, and Cousins was more NBA ready. If they got Boozer or Bosh, Wes Johnson could have stepped in as a 2 or 3. So either Johnson or Cousins would have been better prep for a free agent.
by calling all toasters on Oct 15, 2010 5:58 PM EDT up reply actions
Way Too Early
Comments suggesting Favors is already a bust are ridiculous. He was drafted with an understanding that he had to develop and it would take 2 to 3 years to reach his potential. What is known is that he has freakish athletic ability, good (not NBA yet) post skills already and he has the right attitude in that he wants to get better. He was drafted because he has the opportunity to be Dwight Howard with a face up game. He already has taken NBA vets off the dribble and will finish in short order. And the talk about his desire? Look at Howard, always having fun, never too serious. Who wouldnt take him on thier team because he doesnt seem to take BB serious? And while Cousins is a skilled big man, the post is not big enough for him and Lopez. It is idiotic to say that a player with Brooks skills in the post should become a jump shooter away from the paint. Cousins is a 5 who can OCCASIONALLY play 4. He would get embarassed away from the basket. How would he gaurd Garnett or Dirk 18 feet away. Favors will be better in November than he is in Oct, better in Dec than in Nov, better in Jan that Dec. This is not a title contender yet. We still have time.
by oldirtyjersey on Oct 15, 2010 1:10 PM EDT reply actions 2 recs
kudos
glad to see that other Net fans are on the same page.
"Anthony Randolph has hall of fame skills" - GALLO!
by MrDollarBills on Oct 15, 2010 2:23 PM EDT up reply actions
definately. People can be silly sometimes.
by Sparklespice on Oct 16, 2010 12:42 AM EDT up reply actions
- If Cousins was closer to a pure 4 , he’d be my man easily.
- If we didn’t already have Lopez , Cousins would have been my man easily.
- If I thought Wes Johnson was going to be an elite wing , he’d be my man.I like him and think he’ll be good …. don’t know about great.
The Nets were just stuck with what they could do given the circumstances.
Monroe is an interesting guy though. He can shoot , handle , pass , and has a good basketball IQ and would have complimeted Brook pretty well. He seems like he will be a solid pro. They went with a more athletic and raw guy …… only time will tell years down the line if the decision was the right way to go. Hard to say either way.
.
I can't believe my eyes
Look, everyone knew that Favors needed 2-3 years to develop. EVERYONE! “Well how come Cousins doesn’t need all that time blah blah blah”.. that is completely inconsequential!!! With that statement, you are basically complaining about whether it was wiser to take a finished product in the draft or a project. You want to have that discussion, FINE, go right ahead… Just do us all a favor and don’t label Favors a bust or any worse than Cousins/Johnson until you give him the 2-3 years that we all KNEW HE NEEDED!
5 preseason games is hardly that..
Come 2013, if Cousins is the better player (and still in the league).. you can say all you want.
Correct me if I'm wrong...
But most superstars that were once labelled as projects or at the least “not-NBA ready” -in the sense they were straight out of HS for example – at least put up very productive numbers as a rookie. There is no indication through (i get it, only 5 games) preseason play and the entire summer league that Favors has the skill to be simply productive for the foreseaable future. I don’t think anyone in their right mind expected Favors to come out the gate with 19 pts, 11 rebs and 2.5 blks a game – but I think a lottt of fans expected around 9 or 10 points, 6+ rebounds and a measley block a game while providing quality energy packed minutes (easy dunks, hustle plays, the occasional ferocious block, offensive put-backs etc) and understanding his role. At this point he looks beyond raw, utterly lost, and not capable of providing a punch of enthusiastic play that most lottery picks with a future (even if very raw) display .
For example, the following numbers for the most part are not overwhelming but I think this set the bar for where a developing rookie who is/was touted to be an absolute lock as a future frontcourt stud would look like… I understand Favors will presumably not average as many minutes (I assume 20-22 versus appx 30-31 these guys received), but if has the equivalent ceiling to these guys, it would be nice to at least be matching these numbers in a per minute ratio:
Following Stats are for Rookie seasons:
K Garnett: 28 minutes – 10.4 points, 6.3 rebs, 1.6 blks, 1.1 stls
D Howard: 32.5 minutes – 12 points, 10 rebs 1.7 blks .9 stls
A Stoudemire: 31 minutes – 13.5 points, 8.8 rebs, 1.1 blks, .8 stls
C Bosh: 33 minutes – 11.5 points, 7.4 rebs, 1.4 blks, .8 stls
by BrooklynBridge on Oct 15, 2010 7:37 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Production is not about personality
Duncan has already proven that. The guys that do come in and are demanding generally eat humble pie before they reach their potential. This team Terrence Williams. For Boston, Rondo is a good example with Doc Rivers. Al Jefferson is a very quiet guy and he is poised for a big year. He was an example of a quiet guy that could not be a leader on a team. But we don’t need that from Favors. He is the secondary post option to Lopez and he won’t see the ball much. Cousins would have had to adjust to defer, which may or may not of worked.
I agree with you there..
Those numbers DO set the bar, and it is 100% fair to expect at or around those numbers from Favors. Granted, everyone has a different progression curve, but it does set the bar.
I just want to point out that those numbers are over 82 games.. not 5 preseason games. If by the end of the year Favors is producing 3ppg 4rpg in 24mpg… then everyone has every right to doubt.
But to expect matching stats through 5 preseason games??? Come on now, that is absolutely ridiculous. Not to mention.. 2 of those games had Favors is bad foul trouble and took him out the flow. If you throw those 2 games out, he is actually averaging 8ppg, 8rpg, in 23mpg. Not bad for a 19 year old playing his first few games ever huh?
We all need to start looking at the bigger picture here and not just trying to prove why we should trade for and/or should have drafted our favorite player/s
by KingofDenial on Oct 15, 2010 10:51 PM EDT up reply actions
Because many poor shooting PGs with vision have gone on to have more than sufficient careers, sometimes even becoming good shooters.
Mark Jackson
Magic Johnson
Steve Nash
To name three off the top of my head.
"Sometimes it's the people. Any player can play defense, but not every player will play defense. Sometimes it's a lack of perseverance." - A. Johnson
When your position “job” is to pass the ball, and create plays for others, and that is what you can do at 19, things are looking up – if you can’t at 19 people get a bit worried.
When your position “job” is to rebound the ball and intimidate on defense, and that is what you can’t do at 19, things aren’t so looking up.
"Sometimes it's the people. Any player can play defense, but not every player will play defense. Sometimes it's a lack of perseverance." - A. Johnson
We messed up
If the draft were held today, and I mean today, who would we pick? The answer is Cousins, and at 27 Crawford, who looks to be the best SG of the class. Favors would probably go 4 or 5. We drafted based on need and character, not NBA ready talent, an enormous mistake for a 12-70 team. But the biggest mistake is evident right now in that the Anthony deal would be done if we could substitute Cousins for Favors. That’s why you draft by talent, and not position. I know this sounds crazy, but I don’t think Thorn really cared about the NETS at draft time, and even if he did he’s not a great draft GM as we know. This year could be almost as ugly as last. We could win 15 to 20 and not the 25 to 30 everyone predicts, ouch!
What makes more sense for a 12-70 team..
Select an NBA ready player whose ceiling is an 8/10, can reach that ceiling within 3 years, and can push you up to 40 wins the next season and a playoff birth?
Or select a guy whose ceiling is 10/10, but needs 5 years to reach it, and can only push you up to 25 wins?
Option A gets you to the playoffs faster, and within 3 years you have a shot at home court. Option B gets you lottery picks for the next few years (I mean that as a good thing, for those who didn’t catch that), and can make you a title contender within 5.
Thats just basic logic that never mentions character or positional need. A 12 win team isn’t doing much anytime soon. Anyone who thought otherwise was just kidding themselves. Projects are BEST taken at times like this. A 50 win team is the one that needs to draft ready now player.
Now looking back the thing i dont understand is this Owner wants to win and put fans in the seats, become a global team etc etc, Couldnt have Cousins helped us with those things Proky has said?, im starting to look at this way we have Cousins and Lopez and we go into FA next yr and Melo is there wuld he still pick the Knicks or come to the nets and play with 2 dominate players in the frontcourt?, Also wouldnt cousins help bring Top FA’s, im just saying and all this talk that cousins and lopez cant play with each other is crazy look at the team right now there having a hard time scoring the ball with cousins we would be amazing, Its just lke Wade and Lebron they cant play together and thats false because they can and will show everyone they can,
"Avery Johnson: Erase to Replace"
"Proky:Make Playoffs 2010-11 season"
Some fans have never been a fan of Favors. Its not about quick, its about opening your eyes.
"Sometimes it's the people. Any player can play defense, but not every player will play defense. Sometimes it's a lack of perseverance." - A. Johnson
Go to the NETS games live and help fill-up the arena! Sign-up for season tickets and influence your friend to do the same.
NOT only you, but also everyone here who just keeps on yapping, but do not help fill the arena to convince the star players that the NETS have strong fan base!!!
Have you guys read about the supposedly advise of one former NETS player to MELO about empty seats?!
Also read y post below as to why the NETS to make a quick turnaround.
I was wishing for Demarcus Cousins after losing John Wall in the Lottery.
Many people are saying that Demarcus Cousins is a gamble, because inspite of his NBA-ready talent and size, he might be a head-case. Well, Derrick Favors is also a gamble, since all his is right now is “POTENTIAL”.
With the dismal 12-70 season that the NETS had, the NETS will need a quick turnaround to fix their image both in fans and players that they are trying to woo-in.
If the Knicks get there first ….. Prokhorov’s vision or goal of making Knicks fans turn into NETS fans will sink in the Hudson river as they make their way to Brooklyn.
id rather gamble on a position we need, than to gamble on a position we have our only all star at
why not have a team full of centers???….. this quick turnaround one would not have happened with cousins, fans might be happy because he can put up numbers, but does nothing for our team, plus quick turnarounds other than the celtics and miami usually prolong the chances of becoming a championship team
3 years from now.....We'll know!
It will take three years from now to figure out whether Favors was a good choice. AND I disagree with many about who we should have drafted. When you are 12-70, getting immediate help makes no sense, since we needed help in so many areas. We are better off with a project with a great upside because we will be getting another lottery pick this year, since we will finish out of the playoffs by ten or twelve games or more. Three years from now, when we are in Brooklyn, that’s when we want to get to the playoffs, and get through a round. If Favors pans out, he will be a starting quality PF when we get to Brooklyn. If he is still here, and stinks, then you can say that we screwed up.
Paul from Delray Beach
The Funny thing is
Here is how Favors needs to be used.
On Offense, Favors should get touches in
1) Pick and Rolls
2) Penetrations and Dishes
3) Fast Break Points and Alley Oops
On Defense,
1) Boxing out
2) Defensive Rebounds
3) Block Shots
4) Defend best Low Post Threat.
On Offense Favors would be better if he played with a pass first PG. Harris is too focused on getting his points that unless Avery pulls harder on the reigns this is going to be another wasted year. There is a reason why Avery and King are ok with losing Harris. Harris isnt the long term solution for this team.
Listen, we ALL would love Favors to pan out...but we are just discussing Derrick's current performance...
since none of us has a time machine to see that Favors’ will turn into Dwight Howard or Sean Williams…also, in light of the fact that the Nets could have selected Demarcus Cousins at #3…
Agreed.
But before this forum though Favors is the best PF to play the game and he already proven mroe than Carmelo.
I just about disagree with everything you said.
Based on your post I won’t bother saying why. Have a nice day.
Don't pay Billy King a severance package.
Also next time
You make wild statements please get your facts straight. For a start Kahn said he was out of shape. Just one fact you got wrong.
Don't pay Billy King a severance package.
Way too early...
How can anyone pass judgement on whether drafting Favors was a good move or not? The kid hasn’t played a regular season game yet! He is a raw, young talent, we need to give him a year or two (atleast) to mature and work on his game before it will be known whether or not he is the real deal.
"ESPN greenlights 'The Decision' for 22 more episodes."

by 













