They're 0-12, But It's a Good 0-12

As the Nets approach the record for the longest losing streak to start a season in NBA history, many writers around the country choose to look at them in a positive light. With young talent and a billionaire owner likely on the way, the future is bright. And according to one scout, "if you base it on someone getting the most out of his guys, [Lawrence Frank] should be a Coach of the Year candidate."
- Nets' future a ton rosier than their winless present - Shaun Powell - NBA.com
- 3 reasons why the Nets aren't the NBA's worst team - Ian Thomsen - Sports Illustrated
- Gallows humor from Lawrence Frank as Nets again go for 1st W - Chris Sheridan - True Hoop
- How Bad Are the Nets? - Joel Brigham - HoopsWorld
0 recs |
135 comments
|
Comments
I am thinking is Frank black mailing all these people to say good things about him? And Rod Thorn…Frank has to be the worst coach in NBA history!
by Randy Oreens on Nov 20, 2009 11:40 PM EST reply actions
COACH OF THE YEAR WOW BUT I THINK they right what they said in article but not the part about lawrence frank coach of the year
by julian on Nov 20, 2009 11:43 PM EST reply actions
Lawrence Frank is one of the only things a Nets fan has to be proud of.
He’s doing a remarkable job. Not one coach in the league wants to be in his position. Pat Riley resigned when something half this bad happened to him.
by itsaduck on Nov 20, 2009 11:44 PM EST reply actions
julian (and everyone else – not fair to pick on just one person), we’re going to start deleting all comments that don’t come close to using proper grammar, spelling and punctuation. If you can’t form a complete sentence or put a period where it’s needed, your opinion isn’t worth much anyway.
by NetsDaily on Nov 20, 2009 11:46 PM EST reply actions
Thanks, Netsdaily. About time!!!
This is not just about you, julian.
by KJV on Nov 20, 2009 11:51 PM EST reply actions
I can’t be mad at Frank. Atleast we aren’t getting blown out every game. The one thing he does wrong though is not giving Sean more opportunity to play with Brook. I am going to keep on saying this until he consistently does this. Idc if he isn’t part of the future he deserves to play, not boone.
by ben on Nov 20, 2009 11:52 PM EST reply actions
NETS DAILY i guess you write proper grammar when you text
by julian on Nov 20, 2009 11:59 PM EST reply actions
julian, this isn’t texting or twitter. There are no character limits and no excuses for writing complete sentences. Some of the garbage that people write in these comments is just impossible to read, and it’s not fair to those who take the time to write properly that they have to sift through it.
by NetsDaily on Nov 21, 2009 12:02 AM EST up reply actions
Back in HS, the only guy in my class who never got a girlfriend was told by others that he is not the worst guy in the world. This analogy somehow makes great sense when I read this article.
by croc on Nov 21, 2009 12:07 AM EST reply actions
Most things I post here are written on an iPhone since I’m stuck at work with no other way of getting on the internet, and I still manage to type coherently. I could do without the constant headache of having to translate LOLspeak from people with real keyboards.
All this positive publicity coming from losing brings to mind an image of Yormark sitting there all Mr. Burns-esque going, “eeeexcellent”… Not to say they’re purposely trying to lose every game, but he must be loving it… scum bag. And I agree with the scoffs about Frank for coach of the year, that’s just ridiculous. He can’t figure out how to make up a rotation with 8 players, let alone 12.
by jb on Nov 21, 2009 12:09 AM EST reply actions
eople who have been following the team know they are way better than their record indicates. Maybe this is a long term blessing, maybe the team ends up with a #1 pick, yet another asset to add for 2010. How about that John Wall?
The team’s future off the court will be determined over the next 5 weeks definitively, and the Nets are could have assets coming out of their ears by July 1. Compared to what we’ve been dealing with over the past 4 years or so, it’s nice to dream about something that could actually come to fruition for once. I can deal with the team as currently constructed because I can see they’re not packing it in. Frank doesn’t let them, and I love it. The wins will follow hard work. They’ve been unlucky thus far, but that will change, tomorrow in my opinion
by NJMetsHero on Nov 21, 2009 12:10 AM EST reply actions
ben: can you explain your logic?
As you said, Sean’s not going to be a part of the team, while Boone might. Why the hell would he play Sean over him?
By the way, if you check out virtually all +/- stats, Boone plays very well with Lopez.
by Ast on Nov 21, 2009 12:50 AM EST reply actions
This guy has yet to make it out of the 2nd round with Kidd and Carter on the same team and is 0-12 this season and he deserves coach fo the year….maybe the world will end in 2012 lol
by Meer on Nov 21, 2009 1:01 AM EST reply actions
Glad to see L.Frank getting some love. I think he’s handled just a horrid situation with class and dignity (true he is getting paid pretty damn well for it). He’s probably a goner from this joke of a situation, but I bet he comes out better for it in the end. I would bet he gets another NBA or premier college job pretty soon.
by A.M. on Nov 21, 2009 1:22 AM EST reply actions
Look at this roster:
Charlie Bell
D.Gadzuric
C.Delfino
LLyasova
H.Warrick
J.Meeks
are they more talented than the Nets? Sorry, they only have a good rookie, Jennings, and they are not dead 0-10. They are 7-3.
by jarkid on Nov 21, 2009 1:34 AM EST reply actions
some people think we’re just ripping Frank because of this season. No NO NO……..his employment has been a subject of inquiry from the get-go. This season is just a testimony of what’s wrong with sticking with him for this long. CDR was right. The Bucks were not more talented than our roster, not even the lineup without Harris. They just played better as a team, and their ball movement was phenomenal for a new team. Blaming bad talents and stuff is for losers. Winners win as many as they can despite the lack of talent. There’s clearly a lot of systemic mistakes that the Nets made in the l2 losses, with or without Harris and Lee. Players played hard not because of the coach; if Frank’s the reason why players played hard then the old team should’ve been like that as well. The players played hard because they’re a new group with new personalities. TWill, CDR, Hassell, Alston…..these are players who never had a permanent role on the Nets before. These guys got heart!
by croc on Nov 21, 2009 1:43 AM EST reply actions
You’re forgetting Bogut, Mbah a Moute, Ridnour, and Thomas.
And yes, they are better than the Nets right now. They have a ROY point guard – it doesn’t really matter that he’s a rookie. He’s a star already. Bogut’s turning into a solid big man. They have good shooters and defenders surrounding those 2.
We have no shooters. Half of our players right now are weak defenders, injured or not. All of our good shooters are injured, except Brook.
by pegs on Nov 21, 2009 1:45 AM EST reply actions
@ AST. Alright Boone is not part of the future if anything we can sign a back up Center. Sean has played well the last 3 games and whenever he played with Brook, we played well so thats my logic
by ben on Nov 21, 2009 1:51 AM EST reply actions
Bucks not more talented, please. They just had a rookie drop 55 a few games ago, and that’s in addition to the other young solid players they have developed over the last few seasons. They also dumped Yi on us to make things even worse. Maybe you expect 55 out of Trenton Hassell, but I sure don’t. Also, what was the Bucks record last year, so I suppose they should have tossed Skiles off of that.
Overall, Frank’s had a solid career with the Nets. He’s won more games than any other Nets coach in history, so that’s not a small feat. I honestly feel he took the Kidd teams as far as they could have gone after the Finals trips. I would bet Kidd, Carter, and Jefferson still don’t go all the way after leaving the Nets, even though they are on better teams. I suppose it’s on their current coaches now if they don’t win a title too, so maybe Van Gundy should get packing.
by A.M. on Nov 21, 2009 2:14 AM EST reply actions
@ pegs .
could you please check out the roster of bucks against bobcats tonight?
Without MBah a moute, Bogut. Look at game 1, Devin Harris, Lee, Yi, and CDR all are there.
OK, then I can tell you Brook Lopez is already a top 5 center in the east, the bucks doesn’t have a center now, and they still beat the Bobcats.
Frank now have Lopez, T-Will, and CDR, three young good players, and the bucks only have a player, Jennings, only.
More excuse?
by jarkid on Nov 21, 2009 2:35 AM EST reply actions
And more, Dallas is without Josh Howard, Shawn Marion, they also have lost Brandon Bass. But now, they are the top one in the West.
Yeah, you might say they have Dirk, and Kidd and so on.
But, ASK YOURSELF, do you really believe they can be this good before the SEASON???
Rick Carlisle can prevent them from being bad, but you guys can say the 0-12 stuff is fine, no other coach on the planet can save this team.
What’s wrong with you, you just like the baby face coach personally?
by jarkid on Nov 21, 2009 2:44 AM EST reply actions
MVP with role players can be top 1 in the West.
Solid young players with some vets could only be the dead last in the east?
by jarkid on Nov 21, 2009 2:48 AM EST reply actions
The Nets stink right now. There’s no debating that. Even if they replace Frank, even if they have a full roster, they will stink this year, bottom line, not up for debate. You are what you are. Comparing apples to oranges (i.e. the Nets to the Bucks) will not change that.
by A.M. on Nov 21, 2009 2:50 AM EST reply actions
They haven’t replaced Frank for a long time, now you tell me it would be the same if they change a coach. Are you Jesus?
by jarkid on Nov 21, 2009 2:51 AM EST reply actions
Yes, Jarkid. In basketball, one guy is 20 percent of your guys on the floor and makes that big a difference.
by A.M. on Nov 21, 2009 2:53 AM EST reply actions
The Bucks hit 10 three pointers tonight. They make 8.7 a game. They have better defenders. They have Brandon Jennings, a superior player than anyone on our team, injured or not.
We’re lucky if we can make 5 in a game. Really, we have never hit more than 5 three pointers this season. We make 3.3 a game. Our players are not that good at defense. We don’t have a great player….just young players developing and over-the-hill veterans.
by pegs on Nov 21, 2009 2:54 AM EST reply actions
Then I suggest we should abolish the role of coach in the basketball game.
Coach is not needed, because he doesn’t play a game.
by jarkid on Nov 21, 2009 2:56 AM EST reply actions
Exactly, just because you’re young doesn’t mean you are good. Potential doesn’t usually equal reality.
by A.M. on Nov 21, 2009 2:56 AM EST reply actions
Bill Russell could make an argument for that actually.
by A.M. on Nov 21, 2009 2:57 AM EST reply actions
The knicks are a good three-pointer team, but they lose.
The Philadelphia is not a good three-pointer team, but they are better than the knicks.
Winning a basketball game is not based on how good you can shoot the ball beyond the arc.
by jarkid on Nov 21, 2009 2:59 AM EST reply actions
Re: Dallas – they have a future hall-of-famer who still has some left in Kidd; along with another future hall-of-famer 3 years removed from being MVP in Dirk.
We don’t have either.
They have depth – a 6th man of the year in Terry. Gooden, who started for a finals team – not great, but a serviceable role player.
Ross, Humphries, Beaubois – good-to-great defenders. Have you seen these guys play?
by pegs on Nov 21, 2009 3:00 AM EST reply actions
CDR could score 30 points, Lopez can get 25 and 15. T-Will can score 20, grab 10 rebounds, and make good pass. They are not counted.
Jennings scored 55, then he is the next LeBron James.
by jarkid on Nov 21, 2009 3:00 AM EST reply actions
They only games the Knicks ever win is because of their hot shooting in a given night. They stink in all other aspects of the game, especially defense.
by A.M. on Nov 21, 2009 3:01 AM EST reply actions
Great job at missing the point, jarkid. 3 point shooting, defense, leadership are things the Bucks excel at that we do not. There are more things, I’m sure, but those are obvious things off the top of my head. You go ahead and look up the real reasons why the Bucks are better than the Nets.
Just a year ago, they were just as bad as us – I didn’t see you comparing the Nets to the Bucks then.
by pegs on Nov 21, 2009 3:02 AM EST reply actions
I’m not saying the Bucks are that great yet. Season’s still very young.
by A.M. on Nov 21, 2009 3:03 AM EST reply actions
@pegs,
in common sense, Kidd is not even better than 50% of what he was.
When you are talking of a player about future hall-of-famer, it means he is old enough, and can’t be better than what he is.
Yeah, Jason Kidd was on this team in the last few years, but it was still a mess, they are still not a competitor in the east.
by jarkid on Nov 21, 2009 3:03 AM EST reply actions
now why can scott skile could make their team a good defensive team, but Frank can not?
by jarkid on Nov 21, 2009 3:04 AM EST reply actions
Yep, Jennings scored 55 on great percentages. Something no healthy Nets player could do. Not necessarily the next LeBron James (nobody said that), but he’s a star already.
He hit 7/8 three pointers. I guarantee you no Nets player will do that this season.
by pegs on Nov 21, 2009 3:05 AM EST reply actions
Good point. Nets are volume shooters and don’t score easily. Always remember too, somebody has to do the scoring on a bad team too, and even if they put up good numbers in the box score, it doesn’t necessarily mean they are a great player on a good team.
by A.M. on Nov 21, 2009 3:07 AM EST reply actions
Frank had a chance not to be a winless coach this season at game 1, but guess what?
He had full rosters, had 19 points lead, and played against the 2nd worst team in the NBA, but guess what?
by jarkid on Nov 21, 2009 3:08 AM EST reply actions
The Nets players gave up that lead because of poor defense by Devin, absolutely no perimeter shooting, no help for Brook, and just awful turnovers. Cool.
by pegs on Nov 21, 2009 3:10 AM EST reply actions
WOW, if you’d like not to be winless, you have to own a player that could score 55.
by jarkid on Nov 21, 2009 3:10 AM EST reply actions
Should have won that game, I agree, but still even full strength Nets are not good, it was on the road, and many of the guys in that game were injured in the preseason and had not played in game conditions coming into the year. Still, if full strength, the Nets should have about 3 to 4 wins right now.
by A.M. on Nov 21, 2009 3:11 AM EST reply actions
Anyway, who do you guys like in the game today. To be honest, I think the Knicks will probably win bc of the shooting. They knock down a few threes in a row and Trenton Hassell and company can’t come back. Even if Devin Harris is coming off the bench. By the way, I don’t really like Devin Harris as a player anyway, but that’s another issue.
by A.M. on Nov 21, 2009 3:13 AM EST reply actions
They had 10 points lead within 5 minutes, and lost to a 2nd worst team in the league, what a coach.
You want to blame Devin for a lose for his poor defense, Flynn didn’t score 35, he just scored 18.
A good coach could change that situation, he could put T-Will on Flynn, but he didn’t.
by jarkid on Nov 21, 2009 3:13 AM EST reply actions
They can still lose at home, are you the new fan? they are not the team that plays much better at home, much worse on the road.
by jarkid on Nov 21, 2009 3:15 AM EST reply actions
You cannot point to the good things as an afterthought.
The bottom line is that before the season began, the Bucks didn’t have a “more talented” roster than we do. They’re winning right now not because their roster was objectively better, because they have a system and the preparation to allow the players to play well together and a scorer like Jennings to excel.
Lopez and CDR are ranked top 10 sophomore. Alston was the starting PG for a final team. Harris played two games, and Lee played a few more. TWill had doubles doubles. Simmons was among best 3pt shooter last season. Hassell among best defender. Boone, for some of you guys, is supposed to be an excellent backup in a good team. Yi is soft, but he’s better than many bigs the Bucks have now. We’re not just loosing now with everybody down; we have been loosing.
And this Bucks is as inexperienced and as newly assembled as it gets. Please, no more excuse. You can say that we only have like 50% of what we have or whatsoever, but according to some of you optimists, we were supposed to be light years ahead of the Bucks. A team that was considered as rock bottom before the season shouldn’t be winning as many games as they do now, when a team that you guys think will be winning like 40 games is winless now even with the injuries. Again, we (HAVE BEEN) loosing even with the full roster.
by croc on Nov 21, 2009 3:17 AM EST reply actions
Is Alston really playing like the starting PG for a finals team?
by pegs on Nov 21, 2009 3:19 AM EST reply actions
Not really Croc. What 2 games with the full roster? And even with the full roster, I had the Nets for 20 to 25 wins this year anyway. I had the Bucks as better than them before the year too. I figured they could challenge for one of the last playoff spots. I didn’t believe the Nets could.
by A.M. on Nov 21, 2009 3:19 AM EST reply actions
That’s really overblown anyway, as Nelson came back in the Finals, plus it was Howard and the front line that carried them to the Finals.
by A.M. on Nov 21, 2009 3:21 AM EST reply actions
I’m not saying Alston is an all-star or anything.
But this roster is definitely not less talented than the Bucks, viewing from the preseason perspective.
CDR, Lopez and Alston are not less talented than Jennings, Bogut and Bell. And the Bucks’ role players are not any more proven or experienced than Hassell, Boone, Simmons…
and then there’s TWill who’s probably a better defender than any of the Bucks. The Bucks are just put together A HELL Lot better…..the evidence is written all over the whole game. Even I was shocked with how well they move the ball, even the likes of Defino and the guy whose name starts with LL whatever. So observable!
by croc on Nov 21, 2009 3:33 AM EST reply actions
Lopez, Yi, CDR, Lee, and Harris (AKA Full starting roster) started the Wolves and Orlando game, didn’t they? If the excuse was “oh, new team needs time to jell” then how come a lot of newly assembled teams (like the Bucks) are winning right away?
Again, no excuse!
by croc on Nov 21, 2009 3:35 AM EST reply actions
The Bucks don’t have 8 players available. They aren’t good enough to win with that many players out.
In fact, they played 10 players against Charlotte – which is a horrid team that had to trade for Steven Jackson because they couldn’t score.
Watch how the Bucks do against good teams without Bogut. It won’t be good even if Mbah a Moute, Kurt Thomas, Elson and Gaduric are all healthy. And that group is a heck of a lot better than the Boone/SWat combination the Nets have had to work with. Do you seriously not see a difference between the Nets’ backup bigs and that group? And I’m not even including Warrick or Ilyasova. How can anyone compare that with Bobby Simmons, Najera and Trent Hassell?
And even if you can’t see a difference so far (??!!) ask yourself if the Nets’ guard rotation of Alston and Terrence Williams has the firepower and depth of Jennings/Delfino/Bell/Meeks/Ridnour. All of them are better shooters than any guard the Nets have available. Want to say CDR is a guard until he regains his starting SF spot? Fine. The rotation still doesn’t compare and the outside shooting certainly is no different. None of those three are capable of unclogging the paint, that’s for sure.
Saying this skeleton crew the Nets have put on the court is as good as the Bucks is just atrocious. What is going on in here? Good lord.
by itsaduck on Nov 21, 2009 3:50 AM EST reply actions
Yeah, I meant they played just 2 games with the starting roster, coming off preseason injuries mind you. That’s not enough to judge in my view, and again, even with that roster, I don’t see this team as a good one.
Wasn’t Bogut the number one overall pick? So he should be a superstar pretty much.
Jennings has been awesome so far too, plus the other Bucks have had time together as a unit the last couple of years, where they were pretty much terrible by the way.
Right now, I do think the Bucks are much more talented quite frankly. CDR looks like a nice player, but he almost went undrafted mind you. Lopez is a keeper, but still raw on most nights. Bogut is more polished. Alston is a journeyman. And this is the core mind you.
by A.M. on Nov 21, 2009 3:51 AM EST reply actions
@ itsaduck
I know bobcats are not a good offensive team, but you have to consider who held the Nets within 70 points and beat the Nets even they are not a good offensive team.
by jarkid on Nov 21, 2009 4:02 AM EST reply actions
Jennings and Ridnour are fine.
please check out the stats of the following 3 guys.
Meeks : 5.9 ppg with 31% field goal, and 31% 3pt.
Bell: 6.3 ppg with 39% field goal, and 40% 3pt.
Delfino: 8.9 ppg with 36% field goal, and 35.5% 3pt.
They are not Artest, Redd, or what. They are just team role players at best. Don’t want to make an argument as how great they really are.
The bucks are winning, because they are playing like a team, not because they really have more talents or firepower than the Nets.
by jarkid on Nov 21, 2009 4:12 AM EST reply actions
I am so sorry to see the invasion of the “we are Nets fans but they’re a terrible team” posters from the Message Board section of this website. Their endless analyses of why each team member of the Nets are inferior to most other teams are boring and consistently so negative that I’ll probably not visit this website as much. Thanks for the return of the “Recent Comments” section. I’ll surely use it as a filter for the doomsdayers.
by Jeff on Nov 21, 2009 4:15 AM EST reply actions
The scout who said
“This sounds crazy, but if you base it on someone getting the most out of his guys, I think he should be a Coach of the Year candidate.”
is also the scout who said
“He’s having to post up Trenton Hassell because that’s his best option.”
There went his credibility.
For those who say don’t play Swat cuz he won’t be here next year, either will Opie if he don’t win. It’s his decisions like playing small ball and not starting Swat whith Lopez that make him a bad coach. I do agree he is good at getting the most out of his players, it’s choosing the players he tries to get it out of that he’s not good at. He can’t recognize the talent it takes to win.
by Mr. Big on Nov 21, 2009 5:20 AM EST reply actions
jarkid,
Devin Harris looked like he was bullfighting Johnny Flynn in the 4th qtr of the Minnesota game. I dare say that our on the ball defense has been better since Harris hasn’t been in the line up, I look forward to see if he will play defense like the rest of the Nets.
The Nets have been competitive in almost every game this season, even despite an 0-12 record this is the hardest that I’ve seen a Nets team play in about 3 years. With that said there is no way the Nets team we have seen so far are anywhere near the Bucks right now. We have to see this team at full strength to even begin to make comparisons.
by Mr. Dollar Bills on Nov 21, 2009 6:25 AM EST reply actions
The Bucks are also a well coached team. the Nets, not so much.
by Mr. Dollar Bills on Nov 21, 2009 6:26 AM EST reply actions
This is getting absolutely ridiculous. I mean, come on! Frank is as lame of a duck as you can find. He doesn’t deserve all this love at all. It’s been SEVEN (I do repeat, SEVEN) years and he’s done nothing to not to fire him after a dismal 0-12 start and keeping up his stubborn coaching. Enough with the excuses already, Frank needs to go.
by Andrés on Nov 21, 2009 7:06 AM EST reply actions
exactly, the Nets are NOT well coached team. period.
by JohnY on Nov 21, 2009 7:18 AM EST reply actions
0-12 is still 0-12. AND our best hope for a win anytime soon is today versus the almost as bad Knicks. Also, I predict that Devin plays ten minutes, re-injures himself, and is out till the All Star break. Something tells me we will be “OH” FOR NOVEMBER!
by Paul Erstein on Nov 21, 2009 7:21 AM EST reply actions
I would support frank, but its unexcusable not to have the proper player combinations on the floor. I say the players who preform the best should play period…swat and twill did well against the bucks in the first half and frank refused to start them in the second half…things like that just pisses me off. for that, fire frank!
by Andy on Nov 21, 2009 7:33 AM EST reply actions
When was the last game the Nets had more than 10 players available?
Not 12 or 13, but 10.
Three weeks ago.
by Net Income on Nov 21, 2009 7:35 AM EST reply actions
i forgot about clee…is he returning today as well?
by Andy on Nov 21, 2009 7:38 AM EST reply actions
@Andy
He’s not playing 2nite… hopefully he will be back for the road trip
by Andrés on Nov 21, 2009 7:40 AM EST reply actions
Frank needs to go. We have a team with so much talent that is just playing bad and sloppy basketball. That only falls on the coach. He is too stubborn with his ways and is not getting the most from his players. I hope he gets let go and we get someone who can maximize on the talent on this team and get us to actually win some games
by Joe on Nov 21, 2009 7:51 AM EST reply actions
Funny that the Bucks are considered well coached and Skiles was just fired by the Bulls 2 years ago. Coaching is important but talent is more important. There’s a reason Phil Jackson would never coach a team like the Nets unless they had a player like Kobe or Lebron. I’d say coaching is about 40% and the players 60% of why teams win and lose. Mike D’antoni looked a lot smarter coaching in Phoenix than he does in NY. The talent level made him look a lot smarter with better players..
by supreme on Nov 21, 2009 7:56 AM EST reply actions
@Joe
This team has so much talent? Please. No one thought they’d be any good even before half the team went down.
Celtics fans wanted Rivers fired two years ago. Then, he won an NBA championship. How’d that happen? It’s about the horses. The Celtics didn’t have many then and the Nets don’t have many now.
The franchise is a MESS, an unadulterated MESS. No one has gone to games in YEARS, even when they were good. Carter joked last night that the only time the Nets had a sellout was against the Knicks…because Knick fans filled the arena. The ownership is in a muddle. No one knows where they will play next year or the year after that.
Blaming Frank for this mess is silly.
by Net Income on Nov 21, 2009 8:25 AM EST reply actions
Frank is a very good coach to NETS. Believe or not NETS should give Frank award and bonus. He had tried his utmost to play the games for lost, in this way NETS can get the best draft position for next year.
You guys should not put too much pressure on Frank now. You know, in this season, how many times, NETS lead in the first half or three quarters, then Frank purposely lost the games in the final quarter. Hopefully now you know what Frank has been doing for NETS.
by fplcmip on Nov 21, 2009 8:33 AM EST reply actions
I agree with Supreme 40-60 sounds about right maybe 30-70 is closer but it’s more than just talent. It’s a certain talent that you need. RJ, VC & Kidd were as talented as you can get but the talent to win a title wasn’t there so we had to start all over. Talent also could make a coach look better than he is. Rivers wasn’t bad when the Celtics stunk and isn’t as good now although I like him. Jackson didn’t win without Jordan or with the Lakers with Kobe when he didn’t have a good big man. Sometimes the talent is so obvious anyone could win with it, it’s when it’s raw or underdeveloped LIKE SWAT that you see the value of the coach. If you want to see good coaching, look at Izzo (Mich St) and Self (KS). They consistently win with big men. Also we posters talk about how were in most games we really haven’t played many good teams. Wait till this next road trip. We’re going to take disaster to a new level. I do hope we win today
@ Net Income
Just remember we lost all preseason with our healthy team playing against scrubs and rookies and to Minn. the first game. If you think smalls or weak bigs are going to make a difference on this team, please get real.
by Mr. Big on Nov 21, 2009 8:35 AM EST reply actions
So suddenly Frank is a great coach because he has been hit with injuries? Are you kidding?
WE HAVEN’T WON A SINGLE GAME YET!!
Frank is absolutely one of the worst in the league at getting the most out of the least. His substitution patterns and player combinations are baffling.
The Nets are 0 – 12. How anyone could call the coach of that team good is beyond me.
by eLone on Nov 21, 2009 8:36 AM EST reply actions
Agree Frank is doing a good job with team he has. Have always been a Frank fan. Also counts that front office explicitly sorts for character in its personnel decisions.
by mt57 on Nov 21, 2009 8:59 AM EST reply actions
A.M. Don’t bring up that junk about Frank being the winning-est coach in Nets’ history. He has also lost more than anyone else also. He’s the longest tenured nets’ coach in history, that is simply why he has won more games. If you want to talk about winning, talk about the coach with the best winning percentage. Please!!!
by KJV on Nov 21, 2009 9:34 AM EST reply actions
As painful as it is to watch this team, it has a huge silver lining. This team went into rebuilding mode the minute they traded RJ and Kidd. And the fastest way to rebuild is to get a stud either through the draft or free agency. This team has all the arrows pointed in the right direction. We’ll finally get a top 3 pick with free agents like Amare, Bosh, Joe Johnson on the market and a billionaire owner. You add in Brook, Devin, CDR, Twill and even Yi and Courtney lee and you have the makings of a perfect storm that could take this team from worse to first overnight.
As hard as it is to take this medicine, it’s what’s needed. this team would otherwise be mediocre forever. With the pieces they have in place now it can become a very good team for years to come. And if it’s not with Frank so be it. We’re not going anywhere this year anyway so let’s get the number 1 pick.
by supreme on Nov 21, 2009 9:35 AM EST reply actions
whats good about 0-12 ?!?!?!?!?
sigh, still we cant blame frank so hard, i mean he is playing 8 guys, 1 starter only, 1 rookie and 6 vets with nothing decent to show on-court.
so our only hope is that Harris comes back, same for Lee. its our only chance to beat Knicks.
If we loose this get ready to be ´´worst start in NBA history´´ i hooe we at least reach 15-67
by Emilio on Nov 21, 2009 9:39 AM EST reply actions
FYI… Lots of Nets talk on WFAN today.
http://twitter.com/JoeandEvan/status/5919359839
“Arrived at an empty Izod Center for our big show today…Coach Frank at 10:15…Keyon Dooling 11:15, Kiki 12:15…”
For those not in the NY area, you can listen at http://www.wfan.com/
by NetsDaily on Nov 21, 2009 9:55 AM EST reply actions
Thanks Nets Daily, I will tune in for my ride in.
by Ispartan on Nov 21, 2009 10:10 AM EST reply actions
Frank as coach of the year. That’s rich.
And what trades – Lee (out – couldn’t shoot when he was in), Battie (out), and Alston (can’t shoot) for Anderson and Carter. Yi (out – again) and Simmons (sucks) for Jefferson. Its laughable.
It seems to me the trades really starting getting lousy when Vanderweghe showed up. And don’t they consult with Frank before making these trades? Is Frank completely blameless in all this?
Anyway, the only thing the Nets have done well is draft. They’ve got a number of good young players. Trading Anderson was a crime. And starting Simmons over S Williams is beyond stupid.
Enough excuses – Frank needs to go.
by halwas on Nov 21, 2009 10:18 AM EST reply actions
Hallucination.
A hallucination is the brain’s reception of a false sensory input.
IMO it is nothing more than a hallucination to say that the future is bright and losing is good. The only thing we actually have is that there is a possibility of change and that possibility brings hope. Hope in this case requires a lot of patience.
And what is it with all these writers making the exact same points about the Nets future? Are they getting talking points from the Nets PR dept? I think yes.
by Ispartan on Nov 21, 2009 10:21 AM EST reply actions
C’mon, Battie, Bobby Simmons and Jarvis Hayes for T-Mac!
Harris/Alston
CDR/Lee
T-Mac/T-Will
Yi/S. Williams
Lopez/Boone
by Dirt on Nov 21, 2009 10:22 AM EST reply actions
You trash Frank, then give reasons why Thorn and Kiki should be fired. Are you confused?
To answer your question, Frnak has no control over personnel. You think he went to Thorn and said “I like all these star players, but could you trade them for some unproven youngsters and journeymen? I’d really prefer that.”
Think about what you are saying.
by itsaduck on Nov 21, 2009 10:30 AM EST reply actions
AT DIRT -BATTIE, SIMMONS, HASSEL OR NAJERA or just sign IVERSON
by julian on Nov 21, 2009 10:33 AM EST reply actions
Sean Williams is terrible.
Name one player who didn’t develop under Frank who went somewhere else and did better.
He’s been here seven years. Name one.
by itsaduck on Nov 21, 2009 10:35 AM EST reply actions
Iverson is 1000% useless to the Nets – which is fine since there is a 0% chance they will sign him.
by itsaduck on Nov 21, 2009 10:37 AM EST reply actions
Excellent analysis by S. Powell. Maybe it’s because it’s what I’ve been preaching all along :-)
We have so much to look forward to for next season that for the first time since I became a fan, I’m willing to let them pack in one season, especially if it gets them a high lottery pick. ROD THORON IS AN ABSOLUTE GENIUS! He’s the reason we’ll jump from chumps to championship contenders in one season. I remember thinking the same thing when I first heard we got Kidd for Marbury. And we have even more to work with now than back then. Things are looking mighty good, Netfans (if we’re willing to stay patient).
by MrT on Nov 21, 2009 11:08 AM EST reply actions
There is no such thing as a Frank Fan and a Net Fan. They are either his parents or his kids.
by Seeker on Nov 21, 2009 11:20 AM EST reply actions
I don’t want Iverson on this team either. I think T-Mac is in a different place in his career and is looking for infinitesimally different things than Iverson. Plus, he could play the 3.
by Dirt on Nov 21, 2009 11:28 AM EST reply actions
Don’t forget! The Bucks lost their best player, Michael Redd, the equivalent of Harris to the NEts. And my friends, the Bucks are not just 1 or 2 games ahead of us. THey’re a heck lot better than us. Their record indicates a superior group of talent, but clearly they do not have that. Pleaes face it!
by croc on Nov 21, 2009 11:51 AM EST reply actions
So Frank is never consulted during the trade process to get his input on a trade? To see if he thinks it will work?
If that is really the case, then they deserve what they get. You are paying a guy $4 million a year to coach a team and you exclude him entirely from trade decisions? You don’t even ask his opinion? What nonsense.
In the end it doesn’t matter who’s to blame – I suspect there’s plenty to go around, including the current ownership. The result is failure – pure and simple. And for those of us who work in the real world, we know all to well what the cost of failure is.
by halwas on Nov 21, 2009 12:02 PM EST reply actions
“If Lawrence gets fired for being 0-12, it will be a disgrace to our league because of how hard they play,” a rival scout said. “Most teams would have packed it in by now, but he’s getting everything out of them that he can — they play hard, they execute. He’s having to post up Trenton Hassell because that’s his best option. This sounds crazy, but if you base it on someone getting the most out of his guys, I think he should be a Coach of the Year candidate.”
Yeah, he gets the most, but the problem is fans think there is more. If Hassell is your post up guy, then you are in trouble. If Yi is your starter, you are in trouble. If your best shooter is Lopez, then you are in trouble (since who is posting). If T-Will is playing 35 minutes, you are in trouble. And if 4/5ths of your starters and your two best bench players are not playing, you are in trouble. Take away Pierce, KG, Rondo, Allen, House, and Daniels and leave Perkins and the Celtics are in trouble.
by joe on Nov 21, 2009 12:04 PM EST reply actions
Bucks have clearly more talented than our mess right now. Bogut outplayed our best player. Enough said.
by joe on Nov 21, 2009 12:05 PM EST reply actions
Don’t talk about these things after the fact. Bogut “outplayed” our best player, but it’s not something that we would have PREDICTED before the season began. Therefore, it’s not really a matter of talents by any objective measure. Again, the Bucks are not just 1 or 2 games ahead of us; they’re playing as if they have a superior group than we do, which they clearly do not.
by croc on Nov 21, 2009 12:15 PM EST reply actions
wow 100 comments.
havent seem that much since the Boozer trade talk a few months ago!!!
BTW 101 with this one lol
by mr. omG on Nov 21, 2009 12:17 PM EST reply actions
What more can be asked from frank? Its not his fault 4/5 starters are out and 2 key bench players are out as well.
I really think we need to give LF an opportunity to prove himself with a good team that has expectations. Not with this disaster of a team.
by claud on Nov 21, 2009 12:19 PM EST reply actions
wow 100 comments.
havent seem that much since the Boozer trade talk a few months ago!!!
BTW 101 with this one lol
plZ dont sign iverson, we cant be that desesperate, not vets minimus, not min, not rookie min, not any type of salary, NOTHING!!!
if he comes we go 0-82 untill he leaves town. Book it
Knicks will Hammer us :D
by mr. omG on Nov 21, 2009 12:19 PM EST reply actions
Andrew Bogut is in his 5th season, not to mention he was the number 1 pick in his draft. He’s not some scrub. When healthy, he is very much a legit NBA center.
He outplayed Lopez. So? His post game is much more polished than Brook Lopez and he’s had much more time to work on his NBA game. Lopez is bigger and stronger, he just needs more time to develop. Imagine Brook Lopez in 3 years. Scary.
by Dirt on Nov 21, 2009 12:23 PM EST reply actions
I believe that Andrew Bogut is also Jim Spanarkel’s sons favorite player, because they are both named Andrew.
by Dirt on Nov 21, 2009 12:26 PM EST reply actions
The Bucks are not superior to the Nets when the Nets have 8 players.
Whatever you say.
by itsaduck on Nov 21, 2009 12:31 PM EST reply actions
Funny thing is, most of people on this board said we would finish ahead of the Bucks before the season started. They are a GUTTED team that lost several key players in the offseason (RJ, Sessions, Villanueva), and Skiles is making a kid like Jennings (who was absolutely unimpressive in Europe) look like an AS caliber player, and they keep winning games even if they are playing without Redd and now Bogut. Some of the guys who they picked up during the offseason and are now starting for them weren’t in the league last season, they were playing in Europe (Delfino, Ilyasova)… please, stop making excuses. Scott Skiles a far superior coach to Opie.
by Andrés on Nov 21, 2009 12:55 PM EST reply actions
Never talk about 8 players.
Just open your eyes to game 1 when Frank had full rosters, 19 points lead, and played against a team that only gets a win from the Nets.
by jarkid on Nov 21, 2009 12:56 PM EST reply actions
@jarkid
Exactly! And they were playing without Kein Love. Enough with the excuses!
by Andrés on Nov 21, 2009 12:56 PM EST reply actions
@croc,
i think a good way to express it.
(lowest to highest : 0~10 )
Nets talents / Bucks talents
3 / 5
Nets performance / Bucks performance
2 / 7
by jarkid on Nov 21, 2009 1:01 PM EST reply actions
People open your eyes. There’s a reason why were losing a lot of these winable games. We have a cancer…. his name is….. Alston.
by rknine on Nov 21, 2009 1:01 PM EST reply actions
If the Nets lose today Frank is fired. Mark my words.
by Nets in 2010 on Nov 21, 2009 1:15 PM EST reply actions
Funny thing is no one mentioned about Bogut when they argued that the Nets are light years ahead of the Bucks during the offseason.
Keep talking after the fact. Swift was a no. 2 pick; Yi was no. 7…..big deal!
by croc on Nov 21, 2009 2:01 PM EST reply actions
A crystal ball is the answer to the loser excuses.
by croc on Nov 21, 2009 2:09 PM EST reply actions
I’m sure the Bucks fans didn’t think CDR was gonna blossom into the scorer he is now. No double standard in the real world!
by croc on Nov 21, 2009 2:11 PM EST reply actions
What does Bucks fans have to do with anything?
Bringing up irrelevant argument is the answer to the loser excuses.
by pegs on Nov 21, 2009 2:12 PM EST reply actions
Because some loser Nets fans used Bogut as an excuse why the Nets wasn’t as good as the Bucks this season.
Want irrelevant argument? Trace back to the arguments you and the fellow Frank’s lovers made throughout this thread.
by croc on Nov 21, 2009 2:17 PM EST reply actions
I’m sure there will be more excuse when everyone is back healthy and we still lose to some teams that everyone deemed the Nets were superior to before the season began.
Losers never fail to find excuses. It’s going to become a culture here.
by croc on Nov 21, 2009 2:19 PM EST reply actions
Maybe you need to go back and re-read. I’m pretty sure that Jennings was listed as the best reason why the Nets are better. Oh, and the shooters. Oh, and the defenders. Oh, and the depth.
I would like to see those irrelevant arguments from “fellow Frank’s lovers”. I can’t seem to find them within these comments.
by pegs on Nov 21, 2009 2:20 PM EST reply actions
That’s part of what being a Frank’s lover means. You can’t see through you own biases.
I’m pretty sure many people have said that Jennings shouldn’t be used as the “reason”. The shooters? Simmons was a better shooter than anyone of them, and supposedly the few games that Lee played. The Depth? The LL guy? The Delfino (are u kidding)?
Keep finding excuse. I’m amused!
by croc on Nov 21, 2009 2:27 PM EST reply actions
If you people have a valid point, please lay out the conditions by which the Nets or Frank would actually be responsible for their losses. It’s not an argument if you do not have the conditions to prove it wrong. Otherwise, you’re just keep throwing out excuses.
by croc on Nov 21, 2009 2:29 PM EST reply actions
At least I’m not a Frank hater, who would rather see Frank leave than for the Nets to win games.
by pegs on Nov 21, 2009 2:46 PM EST reply actions
doh, the Nets are losing to the Knicks right now.
Frank is doing a good job. Without him, this team would have been behind the knicks by 120 points right now.
Knicks are much more talented.
by jarkid on Nov 21, 2009 2:48 PM EST reply actions
I don’t see how this loss would be at the fault of Frank. You’d have to explain that to me.
by pegs on Nov 21, 2009 3:23 PM EST reply actions
Another loss.
1.He put Hassell on Harrington, and Harrington can shoot the 3 like shooting the free throw.
2.Can’t make this team to be a better defensive team.
3.D’Antoni outcoached Frank, after two timeouts, his team scored 11 points to answer the Nets.
4. There is always nothing to do with Frank, this coach is just better than Gatorade.
by jarkid on Nov 21, 2009 3:28 PM EST reply actions
Antoni is a horrible coach, but he seems like a giant against Frankie. Our defense is horrible (I guess that’s nothing to do with Frank), and our offense was a mess (again, through no fault of Frank). we got a great coach, and the players messed up, right?
Oh, and I forgot, Harris is back and he played awesome.
CDR was awesome as well; he’s on his way for a MIP mention. Lopez was great too….
by croc on Nov 21, 2009 3:32 PM EST reply actions
They’re 0-13, but it’s good 0-13.
These are good materials for excuses.
Harris is not Jennings.
Lopez is not Duncan.
CDR is not James.
T-Will is not D-Wade.
S-WIll is not Amare.
by jarkid on Nov 21, 2009 3:35 PM EST reply actions
The “good 0-13” Nets! I’m so proud with the team and I do not have one question about coach Frank. You gotta see through the loosing, right?
Something to be thankful for as the holiday arrives.
by croc on Nov 21, 2009 3:38 PM EST reply actions
Yeah man, Frank should have played better out there. He should have gotten more rebounds and made more open 3’s. Then we definitely would have won. Great job everyone else on the team! They were awesome.
by pegs on Nov 21, 2009 3:49 PM EST reply actions
Told you the Knicks would win. The difference was 3 point shooting as I predicted. Nets played reasonably well again, but the 3 pointer covers for a lot of errors on both ends of the floor, and the Knicks have much better shooters than the Nets, whose best 3 point shooters (Hayes and Dooling) are always wearing suits by the way. Oh well, aggravating, and I still support Frank, but I have better things to do with my weekend right now. Later.
by A.M. on Nov 21, 2009 3:59 PM EST reply actions
I will be very thankfull if they win their next game, but it will be a tough one seeing that it’s against the Nuggets.
by Tal Barzilai on Nov 21, 2009 6:18 PM EST reply actions
Hey Kid’s..What time is it ? It’s Howdy Doody time…It’s Howdy Doody time….LOL…..Want a Good Laugh…Take a trip to Doodyville….For all of you young people here..Type in Howdy Doody on your computer…Check out some of the pictures and the last episode , etc…If this isn’t Lawrence Frank as a puppet we will win the championship this year…
by NetFan48 on Nov 21, 2009 11:10 PM EST reply actions

by 








