Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Worst Team Ever Projected?

Forrester: Frank One of the NBA's "Most Creative Strategists"

Lawrence Frank has no wins and no luck, but he has endorsements. Rod Thorn still loves him. Doc Rivers and Eddie Jordan praise him. Now SI's Paul Forrester has his say: "In talking to scouts, it's clear Frank is one of the most creative strategists in the game, capable of fitting his schemes to his players' talents -- no small feat. What's more, his players buy into his schemes and put forth the effort."

Comment 117 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

um….what?

To Frank’s credit, the Nets defense over the last few games has been superb and his decision to start Josh Boone has a lot to do with that. Lets hope that continues when the rest of the guys return.

by Mr Dollar Bills on Nov 12, 2009 7:49 PM EST reply actions  

I agree this article
Frank is a good coach
I still believe him
Cheers….

by Kimssau on Nov 12, 2009 7:51 PM EST reply actions  

Still a Frank fan and hoping to see him back in 2010 with the team he deserves to have.

by PsychoNetsFan34 on Nov 12, 2009 7:52 PM EST reply actions  

wow i hope we r like 10 n 72 so we can get john wallllll

by joet on Nov 12, 2009 7:56 PM EST reply actions  

HIRE BYRON SCOTT!

by MacGyver on Nov 12, 2009 7:57 PM EST reply actions  

Does this guy Mr. Forrester watch the Nets at all??

This is nonsense at its best. His players buy into his schemes? This guy (PREACHES) defense as much as the next guy, but do you see the players putting forth the EFFORT to play Frank’s schemes???? We’ll have 20 loosing seasons , and you blinded people will still have the same excuse for Frank.
And creative stratgey? Does having Alston thrown a pass to the Sixers qualify as a creative stratgey. You’re right; I never seen it! UGLY UGLY EXECUTION, and we call that creative strategy. American journalists certainly have a way with words and twisting reality.

by biggie on Nov 12, 2009 7:57 PM EST reply actions  

He’s quoting scouts. if the Nets fire Frank, he will have a job much quicker than Scott…like immediately.

You should consider the possibility that you’re wrong.

by Net Income on Nov 12, 2009 7:59 PM EST reply actions  

Frank should seriously be considered for coach of the year just for this team being even remotely competitive lately!

Rafer Alston, Terrence Williams, Trenton Hassell, Josh Boone Brook Lopez, Eduardo Najera, Bobby Simmons… That’s a D league team!

by Tom on Nov 12, 2009 8:01 PM EST reply actions  

Finally, some wise words to silence the frank-o-fires. He is an extremely good coach and I am more impressed with what he is doing this year than any other. Imagine having T-Will as your go to guy! Imagine a crunch time line up of hassel, simmons, alston, T-will and lopez. And imagine that the refs swallow their whistles when Lopez is hit. To say he does not support young players is insane given his game on the line play to T-Will. Yes, his schemes are brilliant. We should have been blown out all these games. Look at the Knicks with a much better roster and losing without a punch.

by joe on Nov 12, 2009 8:03 PM EST reply actions  

I love all the Fire Frank groupies out there. I got so many texts today about hiring Byron Scott to come back and fire Frank.

The guy just has not had that much talent the past few seasons. Face it – its a fact. And the fact that the Nets have hung in every last game for the past week or two – with 8 healthly players (of which only 1 is a sure fire starter at this point; TWill will become one in time) says a lot about his coaching acumen.

I still think that this team is going to continue to improve and will start stringing together victories. That said, I don’t see us making the playoffs – which is fine. I want a good prospect in the draft to add to this young core.

by Ryan243 on Nov 12, 2009 8:03 PM EST reply actions  

Oh, trust me, Frank will not get a job other than here.
If he does, that owner will have a lot less patience with a loosing record. You guys can take 20 years of loosing and still consider him a “good coach”. I’ve had friends who’re loyal fans of other NBA teams, and trust me, this kind of tolerance only happens with some of these Nets fans.
You get a job because you make money (or PRODUCE), not because you’re not responsible for loosing money.

by biggie on Nov 12, 2009 8:04 PM EST reply actions  

So turnovers are now part of the coaching scheme? Do you realize how stupid that reads?

Gee, should I believe NBA scouts or some dope in the comments section of a message board who thinks a turnover is part of the gameplan?

And if you think the Nets did not play with maximum effort this week you have either not been watching or don’t have a clue what you are looking at.

by itsaduck on Nov 12, 2009 8:05 PM EST reply actions  

biggie,

this losing record is not on the coach. it is on the rebuilding (they knew they were a 25 win team) and then the injuries. How can you compete with 7 players? D’antoni has a lot more talent and has done nothing. He can’t get his players to compete and play with urgency. All I see from Frank’s team is energy and competing despite being under talented.

by joe on Nov 12, 2009 8:09 PM EST reply actions  

@Biggie Skip said the play was originally ran for Trenton, Alston said himself that he should have ran the set that was planned.

by Raymond B. on Nov 12, 2009 8:09 PM EST reply actions  

What has Frank done that would make other teams want to hire him?

He has no NBA finals, He has never took a underrated team over the top. He has no resume to back him up before taking the Nets. He has not develop any kind of talent besides Harris but everyone knows what Harris can do. Lopez hasn’t turn anything special.

We didn’t make the playoffs with 2 (20 point) players last year and we are 0-7 yet he is so wanted. I’ll take Scott in a heartbeat. Talk about being a company person.

by Seeker on Nov 12, 2009 8:15 PM EST reply actions  

It’s not good enough to get close. Good effort, no doubt! Is it on players or the coach? You gotta choose. If you say bad players’ effort has nothing to do with the coach, then you cannot say it’s to the coach credit when players put up good effort. This kind of double-bind reasoning makes you nothing but a fanboy of coach Frank.

IN addition, why don’t you take a look at the Bucks’ roster and tell me why they didn’t get blown out every single game? Come on, it’s the NBA. Some so-called GOOD teams are not always on their top games. Celtics weren’t! DO not make it seem like we battled with the Celtics in their best form. Yes, we’re lacking in talent, but the criticism on Frank has been here forever. It was here during the JKidd era as well. Enough is enough. I don’t see one of you Frank’s fanboy responding to some of the detailed analysis of Frank’s idiotic strategies that some of our posters have laid out before. Instead, you keep throwing this double-bind statments out there.

by biggie on Nov 12, 2009 8:15 PM EST reply actions  

@Seeker – Lopez hasn’t turned anything special? Aside from the grammar not making sense that is a ridiculous statement.

The kid is 21 and is already a 20-10 guy. What more do you want from a 2nd year center? He is arguably a top 5 center already. If the draft were done over – he goes no lower than 3. Possibly is the top pick.

by Ryan243 on Nov 12, 2009 8:19 PM EST reply actions  

yup, Frank is a great coach and a great strategist. In fact I’m sure that EVERY NBA coach would love to see him hold on to his job with the Nets, so that certainly speaks to his greatness.

Imagine how much WORSE than 0-8 we’d be without OUR GREAT COACH!

by oligarch on Nov 12, 2009 8:20 PM EST reply actions  

Comedy Central at it’s Best……

by NetFan48 on Nov 12, 2009 8:24 PM EST reply actions  

Do not take me as a typical Frank’s hater. I am not blaming him for all the losses. I am equally critical of Lee and Harris and Yi, all three starters who pretty much sucked when they were playing healthy for that few games.

There have been observant posters who pointed out over the years (not just this one) how Frank’s in-game decision had cost us many many bad breaks. Things like not being able to secure an (DEFENSive REBOUND) because he chose to play small ball in the most important part of the game. You know, strategy is not just something that works here and there. A good strategic scheme works throughout the game. I would not disagree that some of Frank’s plays were good design, but there were a lot of bad decisions as well.

by biggie on Nov 12, 2009 8:24 PM EST reply actions  

Someone on here called the Nets an UNDERRATED TEAM!!

When was that??

And, BTW, smirking, flashing rings, standing crossed-armed, playing golf and throwing players under the bus are all traits of a fantastic coach, but I still prefer one that actually works for a living.

by itsaduck on Nov 12, 2009 8:25 PM EST reply actions  

Since high blood pressure runs in my family, I decided against reading the SI article because I can’t fathom the idea of Frank being considered a good coach but one question…

Does the article justify the Bermuda Triangle of Productivity that Opie refers to as “small ball” or “frenzy offense”?

by Jb on Nov 12, 2009 9:00 PM EST reply actions  

The beauty of sports is it’s all out in the open for everyone to see. However, everyone could see the same thing but interpret it differently. Some see Yi with potential, I see a disaster. Some see Harris as a "me first" PG who can’t defend, I see an all-star. The ultimate is Swat who most see as useless and I see as priceless. As far as our coach to really judge him imo you have to know what responsibilities are most important to make him good. To me, recognizing the talent it takes to win and putting players in a position to succeed is what’s most important. While he is a smart guy, a hard worker and a top strategist, it’s not as important as what I mentioned above and he is not good at what’s most important. You could have the best play set up but if you run it with the wrong guy what good is it. His bad style supersedes all of his positives.

by Mr. Big on Nov 12, 2009 9:00 PM EST reply actions  

"Most Creative Strategists"?? Sounds like a great asst. coach if ya as me.

by Ely on Nov 12, 2009 9:45 PM EST reply actions  

fire frank bring back scott in a heartbeat come on thorn and kiki u need to save ur jobs

by mikey on Nov 12, 2009 9:49 PM EST reply actions  

To be fair to Frank I look back at every roster we have had and really he hasn’t had that much to work with. He had the big 3 but really Rj was overrated

by ben on Nov 12, 2009 9:50 PM EST reply actions  

and stop this losing streak, how many loses will it take before frank is fired i feel like 0-13 before they think bout it

by mikey on Nov 12, 2009 9:50 PM EST reply actions  

every day I go on here to find a report about the nets firing Frank
and I find this. Somebody shoot me

by Kingching on Nov 12, 2009 10:00 PM EST reply actions  

The guy has a .500 record (maybe lower now) in his time here with seasons that included Kidd, RJ, Kenyon and VC at different points in time. I don’t think he manages the rotation well. He has a dog house that is hard to get out of. I have never seen any semblance of an offensive system from him. He preaches defense for the past couple seasons and no one listens (last couple games excepted). the entire small ball thing just doesn’t work but we keep doing it. I don’t see him having a vision for the players to buy into.

I don’t agree that he would get another job quickly. As an assistant yes, as a head coach no. If he did, it would be just like here, streaky and .500 at best. I don’t hold him as responsible this year based on injuries but a new voice would be refreshing.

by OPutney on Nov 12, 2009 10:09 PM EST reply actions  

Re:
>>and stop this losing streak, how many loses will it take >>before frank is fired i feel like 0-13 before they think >>bout it

Have you LOOKED at the roster ONCE? Seriously, try it.

What do you think Phil Jackson would do with this group?

by Ast on Nov 12, 2009 10:10 PM EST reply actions  

Frank is a good coach. Do you think Red Auerbach would have this team in the playoffs? Realistically, this one of the least talented teams in NBA history. The fact that Frank is keeping them in these games is a testament to how good he is. He just has nothing to work with. I was at the game last night in some good seats and I could see how frustrated TWILL was getting with Frank though. I don’t think the players have alot of respect for him but he’s one of the best X’s and O’s guys in the business.

by daTRUFE on Nov 12, 2009 10:15 PM EST reply actions  

this is an e mail i wrote a couple of years ago when Frank should have been fired, it will give you Frank supporters some perspective

im watching the nets game on my tv i think im going to puke!!! couldnt make it to the game tonight. heres the facts!

nov 2- 37 point loss at home toronto

nov 16- 25 point loss at home orlando

nov 17-loss at home!!! to last place miami now 8 wins 28 losses

nov 27 – loss at home to last place memphis now 10w-28L

dec 5- loss at home to last place new york now 11w-26L

dec 11- loss at home to last place clippers now 11w-23L

dec 15- loss on road to last place knicks

dec 18- loss at home to second to last place sacramento

dec 26- blowout loss to detroit at home

jan 14 26 point blowout loss at home to portland

tonight life or death with last place knicks again

fire isiah, we might be 0 and 3 against the knicks!!

we are 0 and 4 at home against 4 last place teams that have a combined record as of tonight 40 wins and 105 losses and without us 36 wins and 105 losses.

on the road these 4 teams have 15 wins and 55 losses with 4 of the wins against us.

throw in the sacramento home loss in the record is 19 -67 with 5 wins against us and 14 against the rest of the league. ugh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

the little generals time has come as the team just isnt playing for him!!! its time for him to go!!

no other coach in the league with our talent level would keep their job!!!!!! please the season is over.

or lets give up trade kidd and move on!!!

debbie please not this is no reflection of you or your hard work but we all deserve better

thanks for listening and your time,

by muletrain on Nov 12, 2009 10:17 PM EST reply actions  

If Frank is such a great coach, this mess must be placed where it belongs. Thorn is way overrated as a GM. Got lucky a few times, MJ, Kidd,VC, Lopez, but when forced to make a choice in, draft, free agency he has often been wrong

by Tom F on Nov 12, 2009 10:22 PM EST reply actions  

bottom line is that Frank is the worst coach in the NBA bar none. He makes no in game adjustments, pairs players terribly, runs about 5 offensive plays, has no respect from the players as far as i can tell. Please can someone tell me what his accomplishments are other then having the Nets dumb enough to give him a long term deal? He has zero chance of getting another job other then assistant if he gets fired. I keep thinking of the game I think against Toronto last year when they were getting blown out and then stormed home to win with Hill coaching. In the papers the next day the press praised Frank for lighting a fire under them but to me it was obvious, Hill is a way better coach them him. Please Nets management if your reading this fire this guy ASAP.

by muletrain on Nov 12, 2009 10:23 PM EST reply actions  

How anyone believes any other coach could get any wins with this team is beyond me.

This is a bad team to begin with, and with all the injuries, we should be getting blown out by 30 every game…not just 3 games.

by pegs on Nov 12, 2009 10:40 PM EST reply actions  

Since whoever is being planned to replace him is no different than he is, it’s better to just keep him instead.

by Tal Barzilai on Nov 12, 2009 10:40 PM EST reply actions  

AGAIN, you cannot have it both ways!!!
When the players are fighting hard to keep themseleves in the game, you claim that this is a testament to how good Frank is. When the players are playing stupid and unmotivated, you say the coach is fine but the players are not listening?
You bright minds tell me what are the conditions when Frank would be responsible then? You Frank supporters are basically not allowing any possibility that this guy might not be that good of a coach. When the team played bad, it’s the players; when the team played good, it’s the coach. Are you listening to this?

by biggie on Nov 12, 2009 10:41 PM EST reply actions  

i say keep frank as an assistant coach n let scott run the show again. he’s a great coach.

by tu vieja on Nov 12, 2009 10:44 PM EST reply actions  

Are you people blind??? Even when we had some talent over the last 2 years we were terrible. We totally collapsed down the stretch those 2 years. I know we have no talent now but Frank is terrible. It used to be Franks end of the game play was to let Carter take whatever wild shot he wanted, now its just have the players not know the play and through the ball away. Still an any Frank supporters tell me what he has accomplished and why he deserved to be a head coach in the first place? Frank is the Eric Mangini of the NBA

by muletrain on Nov 12, 2009 10:51 PM EST reply actions  

Hey why not Donnie Walsh?

He did very well in Phoenix. Oh wait, his team is worse than the Nets. Never mind.

None of this matters: I can’t see Ratner (or Viola) approving the firing of Frank in the last WEEKS of their ownership. If Prokhorov/Brooklyn works out, the Nets will have new ownership in six weeks or so. SIX WEEKS.

Once Prokhorov takes over, it’s possible that he will hire someone new NEXT YEAR to run the team.

If it doesn’t work out, Frank’s status will be the least of the fans’ problems.

by Net Income on Nov 12, 2009 10:53 PM EST reply actions  

What talent? Clifford Robinson as our top bench player? Scott Padget? Oh, can’t forget about Jacque Vaughn and Travis Best. Those guys were just amazing.

by pegs on Nov 12, 2009 10:53 PM EST reply actions  

frank isnt being fired anytime soon if at all

the nets are bleeding money lets not forget

they arent going to let frank sit at home while they pay him 4 million this season…they cannot economically justify that

Until Prohkorov is approved nothing will happen, and nothing says he makes a change either…

by SmartNetsFan on Nov 12, 2009 11:00 PM EST reply actions  

You guy say like Lawrencen Frank never have players like Jason Kidd, Vince Carter, and Richard Jefferson.

by jarkid on Nov 12, 2009 11:25 PM EST reply actions  

Honestly, I don’t hear too many good replacements unless you guys are reffering to yourselves.

by Tal Barzilai on Nov 12, 2009 11:30 PM EST reply actions  

Someone on here said Frank coached KMart, Kidd and RJ so he is some kind of underachiever. Um, he was 33-18 with that group and took them to within one game of the EC finals with an injured Kidd. Great point that guy made.

Someone else said the Nets had “decent talent” the last few years. That’s absolute nonsense. Ridiculous.

Face it, people who don’t like Frank don’t like the way he looks. That’s it. Here you have people who know what they are talking about telling you the guy knows what he’s doing.

He’s spent years making this chicken crap look like chicken salad. Get over the way he looks, open your eyes, do a little research, watch a game or two and actually learn something about basketball so you know what you are watching.

by itsaduck on Nov 12, 2009 11:30 PM EST reply actions  

and every one forget the game1, we have CDR, Lee, Harris, Yi and we had 19-point lead, and guess what? the second worst T-Wolves in the league beat the Nets in the final second.

by jarkid on Nov 12, 2009 11:37 PM EST reply actions  

Frank would only get a job with teams like Memphis, OKC, or Toronto. Memphis and OKC dont know what winning is like anyway so he could do no harm and Toronto fans like him cuz Sam Mitchell was worse. Frank is not a great coach at all, he’s great at figuring out other teams plays, but he doesnt know how to get his team to execute to counter them anyway. He also doesnt know how to make adjustments during games or when to substitute and where to maximize his players. Those things have been true since he’s been here, not just THIS year. THIS year no one could win with this team, but he’s only had them show effort for like 2 or 3 games so that’s not exactly great either. He doesnt even know how to hold players accountable esp. stars. Yeah, Frank has never had any teams with talent, it must suck having guys like Kidd, Carter, Jefferson, and Krstic on your roster.

by TheMann on Nov 12, 2009 11:37 PM EST reply actions  

someone please tell me
How did Frank convince his friend Thorn to give him such a huge contract?

by KJV on Nov 12, 2009 11:39 PM EST reply actions  

If my competent is so bad, I would also praise him, too. Because he is not a threat. I don’t know it is that important if Eddie Jordan or Doc Rivers praised Frank. Because it’s none of their business, they just can get 4 wins from the Nets every season.

If you are Rivers, would you criticize Frank ??? It would only makes you a bad person, and you will have to cope with a better coach.

by jarkid on Nov 12, 2009 11:46 PM EST reply actions  

Every one tells like we are only criticizing Lawrence Frank when most of the starters are down.

God, please knock on your head, we have criticized Frank since he had BIG 3, had healthy players (like game one). He blew up SO MANY GAMES!!!

Frank already proved he could lose games with good players, not only he is losing now with a D-League team, he just can’t win any game with ANY PLAYERs.

by jarkid on Nov 12, 2009 11:52 PM EST reply actions  

The Nets losses would have been bigger without Frank.
That is because the players are motivated to help their coach win some games.

After each loss, clearly LFrank is the most upset inside.

Even BLopez’ scowl disappears shortly after defeat.

Everyone knows that although Frank won’t be fired at this time, he is in his last year.

by jerry25 on Nov 12, 2009 11:52 PM EST reply actions  

Re: jarkid
Great conspiracy theory!
Would be so kind as to point me to an article where they are actually praising a bad coach?
Have they ever praised P.J Carlesimo, Jim OBrian or Mike Dunleavy? How about Bernie Bickerstaff? How many coaches have praised them?

You’re totally right though, if they didn’t say anything, Thorn would immediately fire him and hire a clone of Phil Jackson, who would resign as a coach of this team after 25 games.

by Ast on Nov 12, 2009 11:54 PM EST reply actions  

The “Big 3” was a highway billboard scam. There was little ‘big’ about it. Unless you mean 3 big egos that had little compatibility.

by Jron on Nov 13, 2009 12:02 AM EST reply actions  

I know the Nets don’t have enough talents, but if this team in the past can CREATE SO MANY LEADS, They can blow it out EVERY GAME… just amazing.

Yeah, you guy are saying the NETS didn’t have enough talents with Clifford Robinson or Scott Padget as our bench. BUT THAT TEAM was still LOSING against those few of the worst team in the league. Lost to Knicks, clippers, kings, bucks, and wizards …those team were TERRIBLE by then….

YEAH….

by jarkid on Nov 13, 2009 12:03 AM EST reply actions  

then please tell me how this team keep losing against bad teams in the league?

how they keep giving up the lead every game?

how when frank plays small ball, they are gonna giving up the leads?

by jarkid on Nov 13, 2009 12:05 AM EST reply actions  

The only thing keeping Frank is because he has a good contract. If he did not have a contract I am pretty sure he has been kicked out 2 or three years ago.
  The money he is getting is unbelievable in millions. HIs service to the team is like for a win of let’s say average of 30 games/yr is a $130,000. Wow anyone here in the blog can make this NETS win games for less than that. You still think he deserve to get paid 130000 just to have a win.
   And now it looks like NETS will win only 15 games that makes his winning more costly at 260000. Wow unbelievable.

by JuliusIrving on Nov 13, 2009 12:11 AM EST reply actions  

This is an 82 game season. Every world champion every season lost to a terrbile team.

One of the main reasons those teams lost is because they ran out of gas, since they were basically 3 good players and a bunch of scrubs.

Also, please visit the forum. Pegs researched the so called “3rd quarter collapse” that New Jersey is infamous for amongst fans. His findings proved that this is a myth.

by Ast on Nov 13, 2009 12:13 AM EST reply actions  

What talented roster are you guys talking about?
Go look at the rosters each year since he’s been our coach an you’ll be amazed at how many aren’t even in the league anymore. It amazes me how some of you choose to turn a blind eye to te actuall reasons franks team have been incosistent. I’m not saying he is perfect but not even Phil Jackson would Not have done better with the players and bs cheap ownership frank had to deal with.

by Claud on Nov 13, 2009 12:15 AM EST reply actions  

What are you talking about? Dollars per win?

by itsaduck on Nov 13, 2009 12:43 AM EST reply actions  

Ha ha. I love it. This must be getting under the skin of all the Frank haters with an agenda. Yes, he’s still a good coach trying to make his best out of this putrid joke of a roster. Yes, he’s still the all-time Nets wins leader. No small feat with this pretty sad franchise over the years. And, yes, he will get another job, probably a better one, real soon once his time here is done. Now you can go back to talking about how we would have won some games if he played Sean Williams.

by A.M. on Nov 13, 2009 12:48 AM EST reply actions  

Byron Scott will be Lakers’ new coach once Phil retires… book it.

Frank will be lucky if some losers in Memphis are stupid enough to hire him. The only reason why he has a job right now is because of that albatross contract Thorn signed him to, and because Ratner didnt want to eat all that money, PERIOD.

by Andrés on Nov 13, 2009 3:28 AM EST reply actions  

Indeed, I love how the Frank’s keep repeating the same double-bind statement without addressing some substantial arguments against Frank.

1) Motivating players is not something that Frank has done consistently in his career. If you want to give him credits now for this past few games, then you have to suck up the criticism on his inability to do the same thing throughout his career. No double bind here!

2) NBA is a 48 min game. What good does it do to keep your team competitive for 42 mins when it is your in-game decisions and (non)adjustments that handicap their chance to ACTUALLY pull it off—you know, something like, getting a defensive rebound in crunch times. I can vividly recall so so so so so so many of key offensive rebounds that we gave away in tight games in the last min or two over the years, due to things like the small lineup and stuff.
Fans in the stadium booed Frank (not the refs) last year when that control freak stole away a gamewinner by Vince. Those fans include kids, women, elders, and minority; Frank’s flaws are NO MYTHS!!!

This reminds me of how many people insisted that Marcus Williams was going to be great if we ever traded him. The evidence was written all over the place, and people just kept finding reason to ignore it. You will see in five years or so how calling Frank a GREAT COACH would sound in the sports world.

by biggie on Nov 13, 2009 3:58 AM EST reply actions  

This also reminds me how people insisted C. Lee would be a star averaging 15ppg and “DOMINATE”. I predicted that if the PPG was to reach 15, his FG% would take a big hit. Guess what? DEAD ON! People keep insisting that Lee is gonna be the great one behind Harris and Lopez, when in fact all the evidence is pointing to the fact that CDR might be a lot more “SPARKLY” as far as the star discussion goes.

by biggie on Nov 13, 2009 4:03 AM EST reply actions  

This also reminds me how people insisted C. Lee would be a star averaging 15ppg and “DOMINATE”. I predicted that if the PPG was to reach 15, his FG% would take a big hit. Guess what? DEAD ON! People keep insisting that Lee is gonna be the great one behind Harris and Lopez, when in fact all the evidence is pointing to the fact that CDR might be a lot more “SPARKLY” as far as the star discussion goes.

by biggie on Nov 13, 2009 4:03 AM EST reply actions  

@Ast

This team doesn’t lost to bad teams seldom, they lose to bad teams constantly.

Yeah, just keep saying this team is not talented but they lost to the teams that are much more not talented.

by jarkid on Nov 13, 2009 4:35 AM EST reply actions  

@Ast

Sasha Vujacic, Jordan Farmar, and Mbenga looks good, because they are playing under Phil Jackson, not because they are really that good.

Jacque Vaughn sucks? Yeah, but he was a solid PG after Tony Parker, and they win the championship.

OK, keep giving a lot of excuses, we can have 10000 excuses for a bad guy, but the truth is, he can’t let a bad team become better than what they are.

by jarkid on Nov 13, 2009 4:43 AM EST reply actions  

frank is asst coach material. after prohky replaces him next year, frank will not get a head coaching job on a winning team. he’ll likely get asst coach (where he belongs) or head coach of washington, memphis, etc..

by JohnY on Nov 13, 2009 5:11 AM EST reply actions  

One of the NBA’s "Most Creative Strategists"

by A.M. on Nov 13, 2009 6:30 AM EST reply actions  

Wow, love when everyone’s prejudices stop them from seeing what is really there. Yeah, you all are prejudiced against short red heads. There, I said it. It’s out in the open. Even your girl friends and wives only watch the Nets for LFrank – he’s so cute! – and that’s why you want him fired.

by joe on Nov 13, 2009 6:50 AM EST reply actions  

I don’t want him fired, Joe. And hey, at least I still have more hair.

by A.M. on Nov 13, 2009 7:07 AM EST reply actions  

FIRE FRANK! AND HIRE BYRON SCOTT!

by netsfan on Nov 13, 2009 7:41 AM EST reply actions  

@Andres
You are on point!
Byron Scott will be Lakers coach next year

by DJ HeavyDuty on Nov 13, 2009 8:09 AM EST reply actions  

if frank is fired, he’ll be hired as an assistant somewhere else very quickly. i don’t see that happening with scott.

by PA Net on Nov 13, 2009 8:14 AM EST reply actions  

i don’t think scott would come back but i wish he would. the problem with frank isn’t his knowledge of Xs & Os, it’s the fact that he’s not a leader and shows no confidence. The SI reporter calls it versatile, i call it wishy-washy. even with the team healthy frank will change game plans night to night making it impossible for players to have defined roles

by drmagoo on Nov 13, 2009 8:25 AM EST reply actions  

“FRANK HAPPENS”

by NetFan48 on Nov 13, 2009 8:31 AM EST reply actions  

Let’s do a visa commercial for our coach. We’ll assume he gets paid per win.
Money earned after 2 games, zero dollars.
Money earned after 4 games, zero dollars.
Money earned after 6 games, zero dollars.
Money earned after 8 games, zero dollars.
Reading the lame excuses supporting him, Priceless!

by Mr. Big on Nov 13, 2009 8:40 AM EST reply actions  

yes yes yes…we know Frank is a bad coach…no arguments the results speak for themselves.

But why do the same people who yammer on and on about how bad the coach is never criticize the talent level on the roster? Is it because they wear the colorful jerseys and have tatoos and the boy/man-love sets in? Please. When the team sucks the team sucks an dteh payers shpud not be let off the. Bash everybody.

by 2 real 4 u on Nov 13, 2009 9:29 AM EST reply actions  

These pro Frank excuses are pretty lame

When the Nets win, it’s because of Frank’s genius

When the Nets get beaten within an inch of their lives, it’s because the roster sucks

You can’t have it both ways

Frank is a mediocre to average coach who lacks the ability to make suitable in game adjustments and he often makes horrible rotation decisions with his small ball nonsense.

by Mr. Dollar Bills on Nov 13, 2009 9:47 AM EST reply actions  

Frank is a good coach? He maybe the most demonstrative NBA coach there is running up and down trying to manipulate the game but good? How about mediocare or overachiever. Is he taking a cue from above starting Lee because they got him for Carter? If he is a good talent evaluator and a good coach he must have appreciated already the talent of CDR even from last year. He should have been the starter and allowed to develop. Now he is putting TWill ahead of this guy. Personality conflict? Blindness to talent? Who knows.

by Edd on Nov 13, 2009 9:52 AM EST reply actions  

L.Frank should be demoted to assistant coach and practice coach to a new head coach now. Cannot get rid of him based on that $4.5 million salary. Ouch! Wow! There are coaches out there doing great jobs making less. He is not a good gameday coach just a practice coach and it has shown since he took the job over. Suggestion Christian Laettner would make a great coach because he knows how to win. He understands game day platooning of players based on having solid coaching and learning from you guess it Coach K. Coach K would be great choice only if he wanted to leave Duke. I think he is not interested in NBA for the most part.

by Dziedzic on Nov 13, 2009 10:40 AM EST reply actions  

Hey, maybe Frank will become a late bloomer, but to call him a good/great coach, at this time, is ridiculous. Since we have no other options at this point, Frank is our leader. I wouldn’t be surprised to see him get another contract for next year. I always thought that Thorn kept Frank around because he didn’t want to deal with a “strong” head coach. It’s called job security.

by Mike on Nov 13, 2009 10:56 AM EST reply actions  

Frank is going to finish out this season and then we should look in a new direction. He’s an OK coach who will certainly get another head coaching gig in the league, but it’s time for new leadership. Scott, Van Gundy, Fratello, and most of the other usual suspects would be worse than Frank. The guy we should be considering is Tom Thibodeau, and then hire Ettore Messina as an assistant.

by jabez on Nov 13, 2009 11:11 AM EST reply actions  

I dont know what you guys are talking about 0-9 is a good coach? Any other team would fire him he is horrible. He belongs in High School basketball. He is the worst excuse of a “coach” ive ever seen in my life. If you guys want a losing team then by all means pray he gets an extension.

by Randy Oreens on Nov 13, 2009 11:20 AM EST reply actions  

Edd:
First, Terence started one game total – when CDR was injured. I have no idea where you’re getting “putting Twill ahead of this guy” concept from.
Second, Lee has a vastly more impressive resume than CDR does. CDR got bench minutes on a 34 win team, while Lee started on an NBA finalist. Even Isiah would start Lee without thinking about it.

And lastly, are you seriously implying that CDR has vastly more talent than Terence?

by Ast on Nov 13, 2009 11:21 AM EST reply actions  

Frank is not going ANYWHERE y’all complaining ain’t gonna send him packing. So you just better get use to him now or oh well cause frank is not going anywhere! The staff loves him if Kiki and thorn is still here which y’all want them to stay here then Frank is gonna stay here he is loved by management what don’t y’all understand!

by mikee21 on Nov 13, 2009 11:33 AM EST reply actions  

Frank is an excellent coach. Read the article folks. He is a creative strategist. His out of timeout calls are awesome. His schemes to limit teams are effective. His ability to build an offense around his players (think Harris) is second to none. Yes, he will be hired in a heart beat if we are stupid enough to let him go. Look across the river. D’Antoni is thought of as this great coach. I don’t see half as much of what I see from Frank. If Frank had those horses, Harrington, Lee, Nate, etc. he’d have 4 wins right now.

by geo on Nov 13, 2009 11:42 AM EST reply actions  

“You say yes, I say no
 You say stop and I say go, go, go
 Oh, no
 You say goodbye and I say hello”

by Mike on Nov 13, 2009 11:50 AM EST reply actions  

I havent read the article, but as the saying goes: “Don’t believe everything you read”. Frank will stay for the rest of the season because of money issues. (I think even Thorn was ready to fire him after last season. but held back because of his contract. Of course Thorn signed him to that rediculous contract in the first place but Thorn is another subject) Frank talks the coach talk very well, seems like a nice sincere guy, but does not have a clue about what it takes to succeed in the NBA. His only concept is to to play small in every situation. Not once in his Nets coaching career has he ever tried to counter an opponent by getting bigger, longer, hence rebounding better or shot blocking.
Whether he has talent or not, he only ever ever tries to play one way, as small as possible in any situation. I cant take it any more. Maybe he is right and this is great strategy, but did anybody ever look at any or the top NBA teams. No small ball there. BTW did you see what the Lakers size did to the Suns last night, without Gasol.
Frank has always played his players out of position to the extent that Nets should declare a total moratorium on evaluating any players until he is gone.
I can’t take it any more. Let SmallFrank finish out the year and lets get on with it in 2010 with 2 no 1’s and a new coach.
And sorry Nets Income, but no way he gets another head coaching job in the NBA after this year.

by netsnuts on Nov 13, 2009 11:56 AM EST reply actions  

and as @ Pawley astutely pointed out: Can’t get by the huge tie knot either. I cant take it any more.

by netsnuts on Nov 13, 2009 12:04 PM EST reply actions  

Frank coaches the team ok but there is no excuse for the large size of his tie knots. Maybe on a taller guy it would be less glaring, but i think that knot means LF walks the plank.

On another note (how cute he is) remember when he took over from Byron and an interviewer asked RJ if LF is too small to coach in the nba? He said “No, it’s great! He is just so darn cute!” Who else is versatile enough to be coach AND mascot?

by Pigdaddy on Nov 13, 2009 12:13 PM EST reply actions  

Just another reason why he’s OPIE.

by Mr. Big on Nov 13, 2009 12:20 PM EST reply actions  

Maybe it’s a suicide prevention tie.

by Mike on Nov 13, 2009 12:20 PM EST reply actions  

Point is, Frank’s contract is done after this year. No way a Wade, Bosh, or Lebron is playing for Lawrence Frank.

by eLone on Nov 13, 2009 12:24 PM EST reply actions  

The only thing I have to say is:

why is when players get hurt the guys the have been riding the bench and hardly gets playing time suddenly play better?

Is it because they step up? Or is it they have always been contributors but Frank just doesnt know how to use them?

WoW!!! How many people have been screaming forever for Boone and Lopez on the court together? WoW!!!!!! I guess Frank is a genius for FINALLY pulling that off.

by SIC on Nov 13, 2009 12:58 PM EST reply actions  

In any sport the bottom line is winning. It doesn’t mattter if the coach is a nice guy or a jackass. It doesn’t matter whether anyone “thinks” someone is a good coach.

I certainly didn’t think BScott was a good coach but he won. For all the people that say BScott had much better players you are saying that in hindsight. Absolutely nobody, thought the Nets were contenders prior to them getting to the Finals. The winning happened under BScott watch.

L.Frank as head coach has steadily led this team to the point we are now. Regardless of what anyone thinks of LFrank he doesn’t win and that’s what it is all about.

by Eugene on Nov 13, 2009 1:26 PM EST reply actions  

It just keeps getting worse. When he had a team he couldn’t win the big games. So the management started making moves and he still can’t win, only now he can’t win anything.

Is it entirely his fault – no. Is he a great coach – no. Does he have basketball knowledge – yes. Can he motivate a team – no. Does the team fear him more than losing – no.

Its not about Xs and Os – its about results. How many of us out here have lost our jobs through no fault of our own.

If he keeps losing – he’s gone.

by halwas on Nov 13, 2009 1:29 PM EST reply actions  

@ Mike Maybe it’s a suicide prevention tie.

best line of the week…

by Pigdaddy on Nov 13, 2009 1:36 PM EST reply actions  

Here is my opinion on the thing, and maybe it has been said already, but Lawrence Frank’s basketball knowledge is unquestioned. At least by me, when you hear him talk in the pregame, postgame, or at practice you hear that he knows what he is talking about. He just doesn’t have the “feel” in-game. Like who to put in and take out, when to switch to zone and when to stay in man. Remember when he took Yi out in Minnesota for the last play of the game, replacing him with T-Will when you need a rebound? Of course the ball sailed over T-Will’s head and the buzzer beater happened because of it.

by Sebastian Pruiti on Nov 13, 2009 1:43 PM EST reply actions  

Well, in basketball, winning is 90% players, 10% coaches.

Frank puts the team in a position to succeed. Sometimes they do something with that, sometimes they don’t.

This guy isn’t a miracle worker. He’s just a good basketball coach.

by pegs on Nov 13, 2009 2:37 PM EST reply actions  

@sebastian
   We do not disagree with you that Frank has the Knowledge in his head, but as the laymen say, it’s the difference between talking it and walking it. You know, the scientists who study human movements in the lab are not actually the best people in moving their bodies??? Frank is a great talker, I’ll give you that. Is that what defines a GREAT COACH?

by biggie on Nov 13, 2009 2:41 PM EST reply actions  

Have you ever noticed that Opie never gets thrown out of any games. He’s afraid if the team wins without him he won’t be called back to coach any more.

by Mike on Nov 13, 2009 2:42 PM EST reply actions  

Those who can’t do, teach.
Opie would make a great college coach. But on the pro level teaching is like preaching, nobody listens.

by Mike on Nov 13, 2009 2:44 PM EST reply actions  

@biggie – I totally agree with you, I am not a Lawrence Frank fan at all, I guess I was just trying to explain why the scouts would call him a great strategist though he is obviously a poor coach. Like you said, it is one thing knowing what to do in situations, it is another thing to implement it correctly.

by Sebastian Pruiti on Nov 13, 2009 2:55 PM EST reply actions  

pegs Says:

November 13th, 2009 at 2:37 pm

“Frank puts the team in a position to succeed”

Was having the 6’6 Simmons on the 6’10 Speights with the game on the line one of those positions. LOL. He couldn’t put this team in a position to win if he had 5 Hall of Famers.

by Mr. Big on Nov 13, 2009 3:20 PM EST reply actions  

Too bad that’s trivial and didn’t cost us the game

At the end of the game, it was Rafer, Williams, Hassell, Boone, and Brook against Ivey/Green, Iggy, Young, Speights, and Dalembert.

Then, Dalembert was replaced by Kapono and Boone was replaced by Simmons. Boone and Simmons were subbed in and out depending on who was in the game and depending on whether they were playing defense or on offense.

For one minute, Simmons was in the game against Speights, and Speights didn’t even score.

All inthe play-by-play. http://www.nba.com/games/20091111/PHINJN/playbyplay.html LOL. You’re reaching.

by pegs on Nov 13, 2009 3:33 PM EST reply actions  

I see Frank make the same mistakes that all coaches make. He has over-thought a few situations and lost us some games here or there. It has been said before- the guy clearly knows his stuff- somehow it is not being implemented.
It is my opinion there is a lack of respect for Frank by some of the players, not just this season but in the past as well. He talks a lot and they tune him out. This is one of the reasons I have had so much venom for Harris, Alston, and a few others, though. They don’t listen. They are supposed to be an extension of the coach on the floor and they are not. They don’t trust their teammates and they think they can be the savior. Frank might have to be fired because these players don’t respect or listen.
Do you keep the coach that no one listens to or trade the terribad players that don’t listen- quite the conundrum.
I vote we sit back and watch the train wreck.

by molskin on Nov 13, 2009 3:37 PM EST reply actions  

@Molskin; They sound like they all deserve each other. Till death do they part?

by Mike on Nov 13, 2009 4:02 PM EST reply actions  

Bottom line Frank is a poor closer. This was his history even when Carter was here. They lead most of the game but comes the last 2-3 minutes of the game, the other team beats them.

by Edd on Nov 13, 2009 5:05 PM EST reply actions  

Is ANYONE who thinks BYRON SCOTT should be our coach a fan from back when we were in the Finals? Did anyone sit in stunned disbelief as we let a certain game 6 victory slip away without any timeout or adjustment from Mr. Scott? Does anyone remember that night?

by Paul B. on Nov 13, 2009 6:08 PM EST reply actions  

Good call @ Mike. I am going to the big knot in my tie when I watch the Nets. Should be helpful when I want to choke myself when Frank goes small sub in the last minute and the other team gets the big O rebound…

by netsnuts on Nov 13, 2009 6:16 PM EST reply actions  

Good call @ Mike. I am going to the big knot in my tie when I watch the Nets. Should be helpful when I want to choke myself when Frank goes small sub in the last minute and the other team gets the big O rebound…

by netsnuts on Nov 13, 2009 6:16 PM EST reply actions  

No one will come to the team with Frank as coach
imagine Thorn signs him to an extension?

Thorn with 8 players played only 7 like seriously no rest for the players? Great way to get them hurt too!
Frank nice guys finish dead last you arent a coach you dont know how to be a coach you never monivate or have a voice. I bet the team just boss’s you around and doesnt let you talk. Frank you are an embarassment to BASKETBALL!

by Randy Oreens on Nov 13, 2009 6:21 PM EST reply actions  

@ Pegs

“For one minute, Simmons was in the game against Speights, and Speights didn’t even score.

All inthe play-by-play. http://www.nba.com/games/20091111/PHINJN/playbyplay.html LOL. You’re reaching."

At 1:10 Spieghts scored and was fouled by Simmons. After Speights hit the foul shot for the win, Boone came in. Check your source. Figured an Opie supporter.

by Mr. Big on Nov 14, 2009 1:24 AM EST reply actions  

Not a huge fan of Frank or the coaching staff in general. 4 Seasons of RJ VC and Kidd and horrible offensive performance not to mention being out coached in the playoffs consistently. (I’m mainly referring to the Miami 2nd round loss). I realize that is the year they won the championship but we had a very good team that could have won more than one game. Being a season ticket holder and watching Frank on the side with his ridiculous time outs, third quarter Droughts, and his behavior alone brings to question his professionalism. The guy runs onto the court almost any chance he gets sometime you think he is a 6th player or is going to double team someone. All seriousness I don’t think right now there are many options for coaches last year we should have made our move and gotten a new coach. Byron Scott is not the answer he pisses players off along with Avery Johnson you can only deal with that so long. But to both coaches credits they did make some trips to the finals and win coach of the year.

Once we change our Coaching staff we should see a turn around in our team, I haven’t seen one spectacular play from this team in years especially late in the game that made me say wow I’m glad we have that strategy put in place. Look at all the late game collapses and horrible offensive trips, yes you can say it was poor execution (which it was) but poor execution starts with poor planning.

I’m n

by RORO on Nov 14, 2009 8:56 AM EST reply actions  

@ jabez – I’m not sure there is really any good way to replace Frank UNLESS we get Bosh NEXT summer. I don’t think that Thibodeau would work well with this team.

by diehardNFFLbarnone on Nov 16, 2009 10:39 PM EST reply actions  

@ TheMann – In their previous incarnation O.K.C. had plenty of experience with winning, so your argument is false.

by diehardNFFLbarnone on Nov 16, 2009 10:49 PM EST reply actions  

@ itsaduck – he actually went 32-19. If they had won game 7 of the Pistons series, then they would have gone something like 33-22.

by diehardNFFLbarnone on Nov 16, 2009 10:57 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

NetsDaily brings together up-to-the-minute news, analysis and opinion regarding the New Jersey Nets in a comprehensive manner. Join the community and take part in the discussion.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
A Tribute to Brook Lopez

Recent FanPosts

Swordmoonwhite_small
Should I keep going to Nets games?
380169_2234278540133_1343010117_31953200_2031794825_n_small
ABA Throwback throws a punch at NJ fans (2nd NETS Article for RU-N The Observer)
Small
Do You Think Dwight Knows?
Small
Who would you rather trade brooks or Morrow?
Small
Is Dwight Howard Overrated?
Small
Gutting our roster
Small
Our potential
Small
Surrounding cast
Small
What amazes me...

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Jay-nets_100_small NetsDaily